#MadrasHighCourt hears PILs challenging Tamil Nadu govt's Gold monetization scheme which was announced in the Legislative Assembly recently, whereby unutilised #temple jewellery was proposed to be melted into gold bars.
Advocate Niranjan Rajagopalan informs that there are three Writ petitions. Argues that the administration of every Hindu religious institution should be done by trustees.
CJ: First of all ... everything that is announced in the Assembly does not become effective. It becomes effective only when notification is issued. Has any notification been issued?
CJ: You are saying this is not a lawful direction that can be issued by the Govt?
Adv Rajagopalan says yes, it can appoint trustees, fit persons, etc., but it cannot order how religious institutions are to be run, it can frame rules.
Court notes that the gold proposed to be melted is unutilised gold or items other than those required, notes that Commissioner can give instructions acc to Rules, asks what is the issue.
Court adds that a related case came up yesterday, and it was informed that advertisements have been issued for appoitnment of trustees to temples. The matter is due to appear in the first week of December.
Advocate J Sai Deepak appears for the petitioners.
Rule 13 specifically deals with sale and melting of gold. Trustees shall not melt jewel or valuable without sanction - the process is to initiate the process, Adv Deepak argues
CJ: Not at all, under Rule 12, Commissioner can do it on its own. The Commissioner may do it suo motu or a Trustee may seek permission under Rule 13 ... The Rules have not been challenged, these rules have been there for a considerable period of time.
Deepak: It is my case that I don't need to challenge these rules. Rule 13 has to be given its due where the trustee can set the ball rolling. The interpretation being set forth by your Lordship may not agree well with the structure of the rest of the legislation
CJ: Tell us something, what is the immediate urgency for any interim order? What is the prejudice that would be caused? That is a different kettle of fish.
Adv J Sai Deepak informs that the announcement in the legislative assembly has led to a note being circulated, he is not referring to the executive announcement.
Deepak: Specifically, Gold is mentioned under item 4 of the 101 announcements.
Adv Deepak: The speed with which the govt seems to be moving appears to be moving towards rendering the writ petition infructuous before the next date of hearing.
Adv Deepak adds that even if the Court grants a short date, it is likely that the HR&CE Department would take at least one extension before filing a response and "the horses would have bolted from the stables" by the time the case is heard next.
Adv Deepak: Apart from gold, they speak of using surplus funds for colleges. Four colleges have already been announced ... The speed at which they are moving, the entire writ petition may be rendered infructuous.
Senior Advocate Pradeep Sancheti argues for a petitioner raising related concerns. Says that the process is being carried out while bypassing the Trustees.
CJ to Advocate General: You make a statement that we will record that the melting of gold will not be carried out till such time that trustees are put in place. And then we will keep the matter with other matters.
AG R Shanmugasundaram: The notification dated Sept 9 says that it has appointed one SC judge and two former HC judges in whose presence inventories would be taken, not offerings - they are small, small jewels.
AG: The 1961 Rules were going on for a very long time. Maybe the jewelry offering may not be as much as now. They were converting into 24 carats and we have got Rs 11.5 crores as interest. It was used for benefit of temples.
AG: This (inventory) has not been done for 11 years, that is the information given. Now it is to be done in the presence of some responsible persons. And they have gone for taking inventory. This will definitely take two or three weeks time. We are not in a rush
CJ: We are not stopping you from carrying the inventory. All that we are saying is that this decision (to melt gold) - every individual temple has to take a decision as to how much to melt, or monetize. That decision should not take place in the absence of trustees
CJ: You may be doing things fairly. But all of this is happening unilaterally. The commissioner is part of the Executive. The fit person is the nominee of the Executive. the commission has been constituted by the Executive
CJ: In all fairness, you complete the process of installing the trustees
AG: May I say this, the inventory will be taken now and the melting will be taken up after the appointment of trustees. Let it be like that. Let the inventory process go on.
CJ: Let inventory go on. We are happy that you have members from judiciall fraternity, people with impeccable records. But decisions on melting will be taken after the trustees are appointed.
#JUSTIN: Madras High Court directs that no decision on melting or disposal of jewelry or any valuable which forms part of offerings at temples should be taken without the Trustees being first appointed to the temples.
ORDER: "It is made clear that the exercise of completing the inventory of the offerings including the jewelry and or valuables may be conducted under the aegis of the retired judges through the committees indicated by the State..."
"But no decision to melt jewelry or dispose of any valuable which forms part of offerings at relevant temples should be taken without the trustees thereat being installed pursuant to advertisements issued."
#DelhiHighCourt is hearing a case where 2 men where allegedly taken away by police officials of Shamli Police Station, UP from Delhi without intimating @DelhiPolice.
Delhi High Court had called for a detailed status report on the matter from @DelhiPolice, which informed that they had no information from the UP police. Court later directed Shamli Police Station House Officer, UP to remain present. barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
The case stems from a couple's marriage, which was apparently against the wishes of the woman's family and the two men - groom's father and brother - were reportedly picked up and taken away on the family's complaint. barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
#MadrasHighCourt hearing in petition by filmmaker @LeenaManimekali challenging move to impound passport by Passport Authority citing a pending defamation case filed against her by Susi Ganeshan after Leena Manimekalai levelled sexual harassment allegations against him.
Adv Infant Dinesh for Passport Authority tells Court that Passport Authority exercised its own jurisdiction under Section 10 (3) of Passports Act to impound the passport, not Section 104, CrPC.
Supreme Court is hearing the Jarnail Singh case wherein a constitution bench held that the issue relating to reservation in promotion has already been decided in Nagraj’s case & needs no reconsideration. #supremecourt#reservation
Adv: If the person is not efficient, the government will immediately throw him out.
Bench: Where's the question of gathering efficiency data?
Bench: How many people should be there in the committee? What are you arguing? That's all irrelevant. Don't waste the court's time.
#KeralaHighCourt is slated to hear the appeals filed by several of the accused, including Swapna Suresh and Sarith PS, in the gold smuggling case of 2020.
The matter is before Division Bench of Justices K Vinod Chandran and C Jayachandran #keralagoldsmuggling
The appellants are represented by Senior Advocates S Sreekumar and Gopakumanran Nair as well as Advocates Nireesh Mathew, Martin Jose, Manu Tom, Sooraj T Elenjickal and Ashwin Kumar MJ. #keralahighcourt#keralagoldsmuggling
The respondents are represented by Assistant Solicitor General, P Vijayakumar instructed by Advocate Arjun Ambalappatta, NIA Special Public Prosecutor
One case can be reconsidered
One has opted release, seven are medically unfit.
ASG: 25 cases have serious disciplinary issues, integrity and disobedience issues, poor remarks.
On the same account their male counterparts have been denied PC.
Senior Advocate Fali S Nariman to speak on the topic “Becoming an Advocate” at the inaugural lecture of the Indian Institute of Law Kerala Online Lecture Series.