Air Passenger Duty changes will INCREASE FLYING….
OBR forecasts ~400k more flights per year.
But NOT UK EMISSIONS. Here’s why (reason is not obvious):
1/N
(from @StuartAdam_IFS
@TheIFS
presentation)
Domestic flights are within UK Emissions Trading Scheme. This puts a cap on emissions from things covered. BROADLY, more emissions from domestic aviation -> more demand for permits -> higher ETS prices -> lower emissions elsewhere. Overall emissions within ETS unchanged. 2/n
At same time, higher APD on long haul will cut emissions.
(worth remembering that, thanks to VAT, business flights still subsidised. We showed that here: ifs.org.uk/publications/1…)
3/n
Punchline: Another example of why it’s important to look at all policies together and not just on the direct effects of one.
End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Helen Miller

Helen Miller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HelenMiller_IFS

28 Oct
Short thread on where I think we are with Business rates.
Govt launched ‘fundamental review’. Budget bought some welcome changes – more frequent revaluation, exemptions for some investments - but not fundamental reform. Problems with BR predate pandemic and will remain.
1/4
We’ve said many times- business rates are NOT killing the high street; a land value tax would keep the best bits of the system and remove the problematic bits.
Explanations here:
📜 ifs.org.uk/publications/1…
🗣️ ifs.org.uk/podcast/are-bu…
2/4
Govt consultation response said:“arguments in favour of LVT are outweighed by a lack of evidence of the benefits, the significant practical challenges of introducing an LVT, and the probable adverse impacts in relatively high-value areas such as city centres”. I disagree but: 3/4
Read 4 tweets
26 Mar 20
In advance of package for the self-employed, here's what replacement rates (out of work income as a share of in work income) currently look like - massive increases for employees & barely any chnage for self-employed 1/n
86% of employees now have at least 80% of their net income replaced when out of work. Was 10% before recent covid measures. Self-employed have seen some increase in the social safety net via increases in generosity of universal credit, but small in comparison 2/n
Self-employed are more exposed to falls in work - 22% of the self-employed (comapred to 17% of employees) work in sectors that are mostly shut as a result of social distancing measures. A further 9% may need to disrupt their work to provide childcare.3/n
Read 6 tweets
9 Jul 19
We’ve been using tax records to learn about the self-employed - an interesting group because they've been fastest growing part of workforce since early 2000s. Here’s what we now know 1/n (tons more here: ifs.org.uk/publications/1…)
More people try self-employment than aggregate numbers suggest – annual growth in sole traders results from huge entry & exit. Between 2011-2015, ~2.4 million sole traders operated each year but ~6m people tried self-employed at some point. Self employed are not a fixed group 2/n
Huge ‘churn’ in the self-employed population reflects fact that most sole trader businesses close quickly: 20% within a year; 60% by year 5. 25% of self-employed combine business & employment activity but this share has not changed over time 3/n
Read 11 tweets
23 Oct 18
There's been some discussion of this paper recently (because @TaxJusticeNet are, understandably, using estimates suggesting foreign MNEs avoid >50% of UK tax). I've read recently so here's a thread on my take of main issues. 1/
Paper uses UK corporate tax records matched to company accounts to ask how much tax MNEs avoid. Great question, cool data. (Can see what's on UK corp tax form here assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…) 2/
Paper matches UK subsidiaries of foreign MNEs (with positive trading turnover & no further subsidiaries) to comparable domestic UK standalones (i.e. 2 groups look the same except former are part of MNE group). Method will miss largest MNEs (no comparable domestics) 3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(