Reasons to be Cheerful PART II 1. Scottish police back off unlawful prosecution 2. Demonstration against @Womans_Place_UK pitiful, both in numbers and chanting 3. BBC defend rights of its journalists to report
8. the Nolan Report into Stonewall being bloody brilliant and widely heard 9. The dinosaurs! 10. @JoPhoenix1 taking legal action against the OU 11. Widespread revulsion against treatment of Professor Stock 12. Boris Johnson contgratulating @ALLIANCELGB 13. @EBSWA webinars!
Not a bad Baker's dozen. And it's only going to get better. Highlights for next year include 1. @MForstater case in the Employment Tribunal 2. @BluskyeAllison case against Stonewall 3. The comedy challenge of Mermaids to the Charity Commission 4. #FairCopAppeal judgment ?!?!?
And hopefully last but not least MY judicial review will be allowed to proceed against the offensive insanity of a police recording policy that sees my dog on a police data base for 6 years as evidence of my 'hate'.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hello Sue. I am a co-author of this report. Please could you expand a little more on what is ‘utterly abhorrent’ about this foreword? In either it’s content or the fact it’s attached to the report?
O dear. I appear to be blocked. Were I not blocked I would like to have a conversation about what exactly in the substance of this report which I co- authored did Ms Pascoe find so ‘abhorrent’.
Then go on to discuss the utility and purpose of describing arguments who don’t agree with as ‘utterly abhorrent’ rather than either engaging with their substance or respecting that person’s right to make the argument.
My reply to the Vice Chancellor of Portsmouth University. I won’t publish his email to me as I don’t have permission to do so. But I think you will get the flavour from my response.
Here is what I now understand about what happened on Saturday at #FiLiA2021. There was a protest organised by @PlaceSteph which was supported by @amnesty. There was a separate protest organised by Cllr Claire Udy. A separate protest organised by staff/students at Portsmouth Uni.
I am told the police confirmed the arrival of another group at some time in the afternoon. And these were responsible for the offensive/threatening signs and chalking. @PlaceSteph assures me that her group did not know and did not encourage this final group.
I am willing to take her word for this. I have made formal inquiry of Portsmouth University to ascertain the extent to which members of their staff were involved. I have made formal complaint to Cllr Claire Udy having seen Facebook posts where she apparently celebrates the images
But don’t we first have to define ‘violence’? If you mean no women were knocked to the ground by angry men, then yes, happily we were spared this. But then we come to the issue of the signs and the chalked drawings.
That many women who were survivors of male sexual violence, would have found deeply distressing and intimidating and as bad as a punch in the face. I hope you can find out who was responsible and that they are not welcome at any future protests.
Because any movement which relies on threats and intimidation to another group, going about their lawful business, is not on the ‘right side of history’. Particularly THESE threats to THIS group.
Interesting. My attempt to email Ms Uddy from a gmail account was blocked. But seems to have gone through on another account.
I do not accept that it is appropriate for someone using a ‘gov.uk’ email address to be apparently celebrating male sexual violence against women and if I get no reassurance I will take this further.