Thread by @RepublicNewYork

1)
INCOME TAX

As noted, the passage of the Federal Reserve Act was the primary goal of the Bankers. A major tool to assist their Private Banking System was the 16th Amendment which implemented Income Tax. The Amendment was "put in place" by the rump Congress July 2nd, 1909,...

2)
...and has been professed to have been ratified on February 3rd, 1913. The amendment reads as follows:
"The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever sourc derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard...

3)
...to any census or enumeration."

Birth of Income Tax

In 1862 during The War Between The States, Presidnet Lincoln and Congress created the office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue and enacted an income tax to pay war expenses. (Footnote: The Revenue Act of 1862...

4)
...(July 1st, 1862, Ch. 119, 12 Stat. 432), was passed by the United States Congress). The position of Commissioner exists today and he is the head of the Internal Revenue Service.

5)
Implementation of Income Tax is found in the Communist Manifesto referenced as Plank 2. This was just one step in the covert takeover of the American republics. There are people in the "movement" that argue the 16th Amendment was not ratified. (Footnote: Bill Bensen...

6)
...who worked for the Revenue Department of Illinois, and Joe Banister, who was an agent (CID) for the Internal Revenue Service, both did their own research on the legally of the Federal Income Tax. Mr. Bensen had done extensive research and has determinded that...

7)
...the 16th Amendment of the Constitution was NOT properly ratified. Mr. Banister has verified that and much more. He presented an extensive report to his [ex]superiors (IRS), 'ex' as he was FIRED forthwith, based on his resarch verifying everything that Patriots(so-called)...

8)
...or illegal tax protesters (so-called) have brought forth misguided information. That is income Tax is voluntary and that the 16th Amendment was not ratifed. Sorry, wrong answer: It's the 14th Amendment citizenship!) While this historical fact is nice to know,...

9)
...with the doctrine of positive law under the Law of Nations, the point is really trivial Income Tax gurus faile to realize the depth of legalities behind income taxation.

10)
The Supreme Court even set forth the 16th Amendment did not grant Congress more taxing power; (Footnote: Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920). Macomber is a key case in income tax law. Its rather narrow but important application is often misapplied or misunderstood...

11)
...by tax protesters. Anti-tax activists often use this case to argue that wages from labor cannot be taxed as income. The decision in Macomber, however, was not about wages, and the exception for stock dividends was narrow. This is a typical accurate, but misleading...

12)
...quote from the case : "in order, therefore, that the clauses cited from Article I of the Constitution may have proper force and effect save only as modified by the Amendment, and that the latter also may have proper effect, it is essential to distinguish between...

13)
...what is and what is not 'income' as the term is there used; and to apply the distinction as cases arise according to truth and substance without regard to form. Congress by any definition it may adopt cannot conclude the matter, since it cannot by legislation after...

14)
...the Constitution, from which it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised' [emphasis added].

The Supreme Court did discuss what constituted income in Eisner v. Macomber, and quoted from Towne vs. Eisner:...

15)
..."Just as we deem the legislative intent manifest to tax the stockholder with respect to such accumulations only if and when, and to the extent that, his interest in them comes to fruition as income, that is, in dividends declared, so we can perceive no...

16)
...constitutional obstacle that stands in the way of carrying out this intent when dividends are declared out of a pre-existing surplus....Congress was at liberty under the amendment to tax as income, without apportionment, everything that became income, in the ordinary...

17)
...sense of the word, after the adoption of the amendment, including dividends received in the ordinary course by a stockholder from a corporation, even though they were extraordinary in amount and might appear upon analysis to be a mere realization in possession of an...

18)
....inchoate and contingent interest that the stockholder had in a surplus of corporate assets previously existing." [emphasis added]

An important principle taken from Eisner v. Macomber is that the word "income" in the 16th Amendment is generally given its...

19)
...ordinary plain English meaning, and wealth and property that is not income may not be taxed as income by the Federal Government. The Court was clear, however, that taxes on property and wealth could be levied freely by the states, and could be levied by the...

20)
...Federal Government if each state were required to pay a proportion of the tax relative to it's Population - Wikipedia) further the mechanics of the Income Tax Scheme is done through operations of the 14th Amendment.

21)
Who Pays Income Tax

Pursuant to all these matters of law, now some information from the federal tax code will be evidenced. If you study the internal Revenue Code (Title 26 USC) you will find a quagmire of legal terminology. A layman or an attorney cannot figure...

22)
...Code out, it takes several years of study and a full understanding of the law to begin to comprehend what has been executed.

However, once the CODE and the law that encompasses it are understood, you will understand that income Tax is voluntary! In concurrence, it was...

23)
...stated by the Supreme Court that wages are not within the definitional meaning of "Income". While this is somewhat true, the courts do not tell you the complete story, which is: under the color of law and public policy, wages are in fact deemed income for citizens...

24)
...of the United States. This is part and parcel of the punishment of being a complacent, voluntary socialist member of the Communist nation.

25)
Footnote: [T]he America once extolled as the voice of Liberty heard around the world no longer is cast in the image which Jefferson and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image." Chief Justice Douglas, Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. at 28, 29(1972).

26)
"The citizen CANNOT COMPLAIN, because he has VOLUNTARILY SUBMITTED himself to such a form of government....he owes allegiance to the two departments, so the speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties." U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875) )

27)
To establish whom the income tax applies, the legal authority that you may reference is Title 26 CFR, section 1.1.-1 (IRC - Code of Federal Regulations), which is Income Tax on individuals:

• 26 CFR § 1.1-1(a) General rule. (1) Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax...

28)
...on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States. (Footnote: After the correction of your nationality to be a freeman/inhabitant you are "without the United States". Moreover, you are not a "resident" as long as you are in the republic...

29)
..., not in this state. Further, you are an alien to the "United States", however you are not a non-resident alien as found in the tax code; you are not a resident, but an alien to the United States)
• 26 CFR § 1.1-1(c) Who is a citizen, Every person born or naturalized...

30)
...in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction is a citizen.

Yes, correct. That was 14th Amendment language. Of course "citizen" is in reference to a 14th Amendment citizen....and "resident" is in reference to an alien admitted permanent residence. i.e., a...

31)
....foreign person in America by privilege (which is defined by the Tax Code). (Footnote: See tax treaties in regard, also see the Internal Revenue Code - Title 26 USC § 7701 (b)(6). Definitions)

To be continued...