1/For any discussion of homelessness - please remember: the key driver of *total number of people homeless* in any area of the US is the number of units that are affordable to poor renters
2/Efforts to blame homeless numbers in West Coast cities to "fentanyl" are not based in evidence. Here's an opioid overdose per capita map. States with horrific overdose crises often have lower homeless counts per capita than ones like California, where the OD rate is lower
3/Still not convinced? San Francisco's homelessness is high per capita. It's fair market rent for a 2-bedroom apartment is $3500!!! That translates downhill to poorer folks not being able to afford an extra bedroom or accommodate family members with problems of any kind
4/Occasionally I see efforts to use the OD rate in any given West Coast city as the obvious indicator that "opioids" caused ⬆️ homelessness. This is NUTS
You know what county has the highest overdose rate in California? **Lake County***
Count of homeless persons is 241.
5/There are always, everywhere 2 questions
--Why are there more people who are homeless at this time or in this place
--Who is most likely to become homeless, conditional on the fact that there are people homeless?
6/Why are more people homeless in one place or another? It's R-E-N-T & social policies related to that.
The market for entry level starter homes has been terrible for decades. The rental affordability issues are worst in Western states. Hello Los Angeles. jchs.harvard.edu/state-nations-…
7/The right responses are to facilitate building affordable rental units. That means addressing NIMBY zoning, investment partnerships like the National (and state-level) housing trust funds, and assurance to the landlord that RENT will be PAID, so they are not taking a big risk!
8/To facilitate building, at this moment, the best available options (which are not perfect but a good step) are in the negotiated Build Back Better plan as noted by @dianeyentel
9/If you are asking the OTHER question ("why is THIS person homeless and not THAT one?") yes it's perfectly understandable to infer that poor income, low social support, disability, and indeed mental illness/addiction are strong indicators of who "falls out" of the housing market
10/The best summation of the evidence we have right now comes from Mary Beth Shinn and Jill Khadduri "Homelessness in the Midst of Plenty and What to Do About It" - evidenceonhomelessness.com/recent_highlig…
11/Many studies tabulate correlates of homelessness- our research shows that among Veterans who have experienced homelessness, being unsheltered is tied to the NUMBER of personal vulnerabilities, and further impacted by community weather, rents & shelters
12/If you are a frustrated person living in a city with lots of unsheltered persons, I hear you. It's not easy to see sometimes.
But please understand: the condition of the person you see in a tent is not the REASON your community has a lot of people in tents.
13/If you think I don't understand how addiction can contribute to a person becoming homeless, think again. I'm an addiction clinician who works with people experiencing homelessness.
But that addiction is not the REASON your community has more people in tents than another.
14/The number of people with roofs over heads has everything to do with how many roofs are affordable for how many heads that don't have high income. / fin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Prescription opioid counts have fallen to levels last seen in 1992,reports @US_FDA Corinne Woods, PharmD for workshop at Duke Margolis today
2/Prescription #opioid milligrams are at levels of early 2000s. That number is higher (relative to prescription count) according to @US_FDA Corinne Woods, PharmD at Duke-Margolis today - I think this difference reflects the patients with long term receipt.
3/Total milligrams and total count of oral tablets in an “initial prescription” have declined, reports @US_FDA Corinne Woods, PharmD to today’s session for Duke-Margolis and FDA (2 images here)
1/An excellent new article reviews this summer’s controversial pushback against efforts to remediate the antisemitic mistreatment of Mountain Brook Jewish youth, by other youth. I will share some comments as a regional resident too atlantajewishtimes.com/adl-embroiled-…
2/First, antisemitic comments or mistreatment of Jewish students in suburbs south of Birmingham is the “modal experience”, ie most Jewish students hear comments denigrating their religion, from peers. This doesn’t mean most non-Jewish students say such things or harbor such views
3/I base my statement that it is the “modal” experience from talking with Jewish youth who grew up here and with their parents and confirming with multiple Rabbis. And *none of this is unique to Mountain Brook* - it typifies *all the bourgeois suburbs south of Birmingham*
1/Preventing evictions saved lives during this pandemic writes Matt Desmond (aka @just_shelter) in this new piece - one key problem is we haven't acted to deal with the prepandemic situation. Normally, we have 7 eviction filings per minute nytimes.com/2021/09/30/opi…
2/The national eviction moratorium lasted 331 days, averting 1.6m evictions, reducing pandemic deaths by 11%. Southeastern states, where evictions are⬆️& vaccinations⬇️have not robustly acted to limit evictions, he writes
3/Small landlords have lost real money. However foreclosures on their properties are ⬇️78% vs prepandemic era, due to a moratorium on foreclosures. The $47bn Congress allocated to protect tenants & landlords has been very slow in distribution...
2/For my peers, let’s acknowledge: (a) there are patients for whom taper is helpful, (b)retrospective database studies showing harm (or lack of harm) don’t permit strong, uniform conclusions
(c) in medicine, we normally don’t force change on stable patients absent consent ☑️
3/But in practical reality, the policies and metrics that tend to incentivize or mandate forcible taper of stable patients lack credible evidence in their favor, and at this time they run contrary to 3 separate federal declarations from: FDA, CDC, HHS, all in 2019.
@conor64@cultofphil@rhett_orackle@KennyGIsCool@benshapiro 2/Most crashes don't involve loss of life. Among about 6m car crashes a year, only 36,000 people died in 2019, ie 6 deaths per 1000 crashes. So if you drive drunk 625000 times, crudely, there are 6 deaths (lower bound, due to assumptions)
@conor64@cultofphil@rhett_orackle@KennyGIsCool@benshapiro 3/It's reasonable to guesstimate that "drunk crashes are more lethal crashes"(someone has studied this; not me).. So let's assume a person who drives drunk 100000 times causes 10 deaths. But we know that's not the real math because no single person drives drunk 100k times a year
1/New study in @DrugAlcoholDep finds that a national Stay-at-Home order for COVID-19 had "variable" impacts on opioid OD-
And it demonstrates that Emergency Dept overdose diagnoses deliver only a very cloudy view on overdose rates, - KY, OH, MA, NY sciencedirect.com/science/articl…!
2/ 3 of 4 states (MA,NY,OH,*not KY*) had a 10 week ⬇️ in ED visits for opioid OD after pandemic hit.
Then, ED visits ⬆️ for MA,OH,KY
**But ED visits don't relate tightly to death**
OD deaths for 2020, relative to 2019:
MA:⬆️2%
NY:⬆️34%
KY:⬆️54%
OH:⬆️22% commonwealthfund.org/blog/2021/drug…
3/Authors conclude what I agree with, but I'll comment.
They say:
"results support our hypothesis of a significant impact of the national stay-at-home order on ED encounters for suspected OOD in the 4 HCS states, but indicate that the dynamics of this impact differed"