The C19 response is destined to be remembered as a colossal failure for public health. But as crazy train moves down the tracks, C19 appears to ever morphed, into a "Pandemic of the Overeducated". A strange phenomenon indeed. Let's consider. 1/
The working class, in my corner of world, long abandoned the idea that C19 was a pandemic. A concern.....yes, but mainly an annoyance to be avoided. They never engrained the feeling of personal threat and life moves forward, as best it can. 2/
So what made large portions of the working class immune to the C19 craziness? Did they pour over case/death charts, read the latest research paper or consider the opinion of scholarly experts. Perhaps, but it seems other factors were at play. 3/
The working class in Canada consume less legacy media, and they are distrustful of gov't and experts. They tend to be better grounded in community and their experience more so than sterile theory, shapes opinions and decisions. 4/
Perhaps these qualities "Pandemic proofed" the working class. The professional class, however, remains under the C19 spell, convinced that certain death has only been adverted by the two meter rule and a non medical facemask unable to block viral transmission. 5/
The cognitive dissonance is remarkable, many examples abound including the law profession. Witness the parade of alarmist articles justifying the loss of civil liberties because C19 is an existential threat. It's so serious, the mere examination of data appears too dangerous. 6/
One can point to the greater consumption of legacy media, and a stronger belief in "expertise" as barriers to critical analysis. This belief held strong despite a continuous record of falsehood and a lack of pandemic experts in Canada. Something else maybe at play. 7/
The C19 response has revealed that the professional mind can be readily captured by utopian belief. Witness the acceptance of Covid Zero in the academic ranks or vaccines being a magic elixir of life. This quirk has rendered critical thinking moot. 8/
So how do we release the professional class from mass hypnosis, it's gravitation to the utopian? Turn off the TV or will one new data graph do the trick? Not likely at this point, so more direct action maybe key. 9/
We might have to do something completely uncanadian. We might have to tell the professional class that "their experts and their plans" have failed. That failure by extension reflects upon them. An unpleasant thought but perhaps one necessary to move this country forward. End.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's celebrate this clear eyed tweet. A simple statement of facts highlighting the non existent rationale for vaccinating children. But why is this message so important?
It's because Dr. Lewis, is an articulate, high ranking MP with clear political aspirations. She is willing to take a principled stand and take the heat. She won't be the only one as there are many on the left which also recognize the folly of the C19 debacle. 2/
These public expressions were impossible a year ago as irrational fear, spurred by the relentless fear mongering of public health ran amok. It would have been political suicide. But....through the efforts of Team Realty, we carved out a public space for rational discussion.
3/
It's hard to repress ones cynicism and say "What plan". But, I will try to be constructive. Mr. Premier @fordnation, next week is too late and I tell you why.
The exasperation that front line health care workers have for public health and your gov't is accelerating rapidly. They see units closed, staff fired, patients denied service and/or shunted. Just today, multiple colleagues decided to retire. They see breakdown in real time.
2/
Running a health system is hard and requires sound policy implementation. It isn't a virtue signaling exercise. People in this province are practical and they expect competent service for the taxes they pay. This isn't happening.
3/
Alex Berenson is at the top of his game. His command of the literature is excellent and there are few politicians, public health officials or reporters that can match his chops. He has a remarkable talent and please take the time to listen.
He lays out in simple detail how public health's "fly by the seat of their pants approach" has morphed into failure. And that is what you are seeing. A failure which in Canada is held together by a mountain of cash from Ottawa.
2/
His discussion illuminates the period between March-June 2021 when vaccines morphed,at least to those paying attention, from great promise closer to failure. This was in essence the "last hope" of public health to redeem itself.
3/
The "bad cat" is back discussing the clever work of Dr. Norman Fenton. This work cuts through the noise and focuses on a clear unambiguous point. Does vaccine uptake change all cause mortality, an indice impervious to revisionism? 1/
This is serious work done by a clever data analyst and the answer BTW is No. At this point in time, there is no observable benefit to vaccine uptake. Digging into the analysis, there are some interesting caveats that do require careful consideration. 2/
Long story short, it basically comes down to this. Vaccination results in an initial rise in death that offsets the long term benefits. Those long term benefits are in turn time limited as vaccine efficacy fades after 5-6 months. 3/
So who won the C19 Olympics? Its seems Denmark, Sweden and Norway have captured gold, silver and bronze. Meanwhile Canada is looking for a participation medal if it can figure a way across the finish line. How did it go all so wrong in this seemingly advanced nation? 1/
Simply speaking, it all comes down to approach, experience and the guiding principles. The Scandinavian countries adopted a voluntary "mitigation" strategy (tried and true) whereas Canada employed a centrally planned "general suppression" model (new and radical). 2/
Scandinavia's mitigation strategy highlighted transparency, honesty and the gentle art of persuasion. They valued an informed public, openly admitted mistakes and acknowledged that public health measures were limited in efficacy. It valued the concept that "less is better". 3/
Anders Tegnell, Sweden's chief public health officer, has been an anchor point of common sense and decency during C19. He was ridiculed early for classifying C19 as a "hard flu" and for following the standard pandemic playbook. Boring and practical was the new "radical". 1/
What stuck in my mind was his constant refrain, "lets talk in a year or so and see where we are". He knew the test of time reveals all about the choices a society makes and whether they are wise. 2/
Here we are 18 months later and Sweden won in a blow out. Practicality and honesty won the day in every imaginable category. From age adjusted death, to maintaining an intact functional society. They are finished with C19. 3/