I’m not gonna be alive to see it, but is this going to be one of those things like slavery — where Americans of a future age try to excuse our generations’ permanent moral stain by saying “well, you see, they didn’t know better by the standards of the time?”
“Sure, they roasted the planet, but you have to judge them by the standards of the time.” Except that will be bullsh*t — because we knew we were roasting the planet, and millions upon millions upon millions of us have been calling upon humanity to _not do that_.
Very much this energy, in other words:
[future STUDENT:]
“Why did America burn fossil fuels when Americans knew doing it could render much of the Indian subcontinent, home to nearly 2 billion people, uninhabitable?”
[future CONSERVATIVE:]
“Look, life is complicated.”
One can make all sorts of innocuous explanations here — but given that the Court had the freedom to do this in a multitude of ways that looked less political, I have a hard time crediting such excuses.
The ‘critical race theory’ panic is essentially the upscale companion brand of ‘Great Replacement’ talk. It gives those trying to mobilize people who see themselves as part of the gentry, rather than the rabble, a way to dress racialized fear in safe, khaki-and-fleece garb.
That reality explains why we see the likes of Sully fanning the flames of ‘critical race theory’ panic—and why Fox constantly switches between serving up lite, easier-going CRT messaging on its dayside & Tucker’s uncut white-nationalist rhetoric at night. mediamatters.org/white-national…
Both lines of racialized nonsense share the same root fear: that some radical other is imposing a foreign culture or mode of thought on our children, and ‘we’ need to stop it. See what Sully wrote again:
Love to see a billionaire address coastal California’s housing issues by funding a beachside clinical-depression pen filled with windowless rooms for young people. independent.com/2021/10/28/arc…
“So the campus fronts the Pacific Ocean …”
“… okay?”
“… but we’re short of housing …"
“… right, so …”
“We need a way to help students stuck living in trailers or cars.”
“Got it. I have a brilliant idea. Jeeves, get the blueprints!”
“Hey Siri, show me the problem with a wealth-hoarding gerontocracy?”
This column by @ddayen — which berates the tendency by Congress (or Dems in Congress, more properly) “to resolve longstanding policy issues by erecting complicated systems that an untutored public must navigate” — is spot on. nytimes.com/2021/10/26/opi…
A thought that’s stayed on my mind through the protracted negotiations over BBB is the imperative of driving home to key Dem decision makers that we—despite our educations, our experience, our standardized-test verified wisdom—are not so smart.
What I mean by this: with our big brains, Dem wonks have the brainpower to work up the most byzantine policy designs. But whatever brilliance gets put to paper by Congress — the proposal to run paid leave through private insurance companies, for instance — has to get executed.
John Roberts might be the wrongest man alive in the United States today — yet he heads a branch of the federal government.
What the GOP proposes in Alabama is ridiculous. Its map splits Jefferson Co. (the state’s most populous) in half, bundles the wealthy Shelby Co. suburbs with lower-income Blount Co. — and stretches the traditional Birmingham district through the Black Belt almost to Mobile.
I’d have thought at any point in my life before recent times that such deaths would fill the headlines. Instead, they make a mere backdrop for, tonight alone, four stories that depict a country set morally adrift:
We are cursed, it appears, to live in interesting times.