I know I once called out at Arteta to 'throw the bag' at him but upon further study, I am reviewing my opinion of Aleksander Isak.
For the rumored price it would
take to take to get him out of Real Sociedad, it is not worth it.
He needs to go up about two levels for it to be worth it.
He could do it with us but that would not be the best use of time and resources.
He'd be an upgrade on Lacazette but only very marginally so.
The likes of Tammy Abraham and Victor Osimhen have so much over Isak.
Take for instance the fact that Isak is not a killer striker—his ballstriking, box play, positioning, desire to score goals, etc do not inspire fear. You could let him lose around 18-yard boxes and the opposition have a feeling of safety—something you'd never get with a top CF.
Almost every single option on the market for us will score more goals for us than Isak. Vlahovic may not seem to have much else about him but he's mastered box CF play, which means he will simply always score goals by a significant default amount.
With someone like Tammy, you
are getting the next killer CF. Tammy Abraham has completely mastered how to play as a striker in the box. No wonder we retained strong interest in him during the window.
In any case, Isak's linkup, while being really good is not special enough. All that Isak stands for at 22 is
potential. Can he put it all together? Maybe. Has he shown enough just yet to justify spending Ben White money?
BIG NO.
No reason why we should when far more accomplished CFs in Osimhen and Abraham exist for around the same price range.
If we can't get either, then prioritize
one of Martinelli, TJJ or Folarin as our next striker. Martinelli has almost mastered box CF play at 20 already, just needs more experience there.
Spend that striker money elsewhere, then. I don't want us spending more than 35 million euros on Isak if nothing changes about him.
Basically, Isak is good enough for Arsenal outside of the box but not inside it. Not a good thing. Someone like Osimhen or Tammy bring similar things outside of the box and a huge amount of quality inside it (Tammy is better than Osimhen here, too).
And for all of Isak's height,
mobility and technique, the on pitch value he has over Dusan Vlahovic is marginal at best, perhaps even equal.
If he comes to Arsenal right now, he will be a slightly better version of Alexandre Lacazette. 15-17 goals a season. For that price?
At some point, with CFs, technical
advantages enter a diminishing return spectrum.
You don't need the most outstanding technique to be good enough at CL as a striker, you just need to be reliable. And when you bring so many other qualities, it gets even less important.
22-year-old Lukaku vs 22-year-old Isak.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Too many on this platform are scared of getting too far ahead of conventional wisdom. If I say Arteta may be ahead of Tuchel, it's not batshit crazy—it's projection. People forget that Arteta is still very new on the scene...
(KRAKEN THREAD; for tacticos only)
...with only 1.5 seasons of management at the highest level and with so much ahead of him.
Take Tuchel himself for an instance, when he appeared on the scene his in-game principles were better than Klopp's. He was already a better coach (not manager) but nobody dared say it out.
Tuchel is not faultless. He is not as politically or as emotionally astute as Klopp is. He hasn't handled a rebuild under intense pressure and poor conditions such as Klopp has (2x). He can't identify, recruit and manage talent as well as Klopp can. In fact, overall, the
If a 20-year-old CB won't fight for his place because one player is ahead of him at Arsenal, then I don't want him at my club. He can go be the Mbappe of CBs somewhere else.
Tacticos overfetishize talent. Yes, Saliba has potential but he's not the only great CB prospect around.
5 years ago and I would be afraid of losing him. Nowadays, CBs with a class passing range and ball-carrying who are built like a tank and run like bullets are dime a dozen. Saliba is super talented but you don't need the most talented CB prospect in the world to build a defense.
The thing with this United team is that... they badly lack fundamentals.
Ingrained fundamentals are what makes any team competitive, what keeps you alive in games and what determines your level over a long period.
United are lacking in too many fundamentals.
(KRAKEN THREAD)
These things are that makes a team and what it can do.
Fundamentals or the lack thereof cannot be easily defined but you can generally grade via eye test or via data if you want. You would want to score 'Decent' in everything and 'elite' at a few things.
The best teams in Europe are usually elite at
1. Buildup. 2. Pressing. 3. Sustained pressure. 3. Ball retention in all phases. 4. Compactness in all phases. 5. Counterattacking. 6. Defensive workrate.
These are fundamentals that make these teams not just difficult to beat but
Yesterday, Tavares passed to Tomiyasu from left to right on his weaker foot, then Tomiyasu did the same right back. Ben White was carrying the ball from defense to the final third. Aaron Ramsdale was slicing Villa open with his passes. We were winning every duel on the halfway
line. Tomiyasu was outpacing his man for a long pass. Aubameyang was flicking the ball out wide after receiving from the leftback.
These were things that Arteta wanted from Day 1. This is the vision. He didn't have half of these things a few months ago...
His vision is not even complete yet. There is so much else he wants to add. But Arsenal fans were screaming murder when he didn't have the tools but still retained the vision.
For me, Arteta's rebuild only begun when we had Smith-Rowe come back in. In fact, I could go one more
Understand this: we are facing the last hurdle on our path to glory—the wholesale revamp of the team identity and mentality. Culture is intangible and powerful. This new team is not yet confident in itself but that is a natural issue that will disappear with time.
(a thread)
The key ingredients for a new age has been set, thanks to Arteta's ruthless rebuild. We have poured out the old wine. Now is the time for a new wineskin, for a new atmosphere. For confidence.
Now is the time for this team to realize that they can do more than they have done.
Have you noticed that throughout this season, we have always begun our games pretty well? Even against European finalists in Chelsea and City?
We always start very well and then the team slowly starts to lose its own confidence and authority. The passes get longer and higher.
Liverpool versus Brentford was a game that clearly needed Liverpool to be very technically secure and not give Brentford any ball to scrap on. Klopp knew this. Every half decent coach knows this but Liverpool still failed to let the ball stick well enough. Nothing tactical there.
This almost never happens to City. I'm not sure exactly why but they simply never have a game where they can't retain the ball fine enough.
Guess the amount of turnover in players between Liverpool and City.
Guess our own turnover. Over 20 players have left in like 3 years.