1/15
Why are statins administered at night?

In this tweetorial I'll discuss the mechanistic and historical reasons for the frequently used QHS dosing schedule. And why it's often unnecessary.

But before we get there, I'm curious: when do you prescribe/order/take statins?
2/
Early studies suggested that evening administration of statins led to a greater reduction in cholesterol when compared with morning dosing.

Two notes on the linked study:
➤It is small
➤The differences in LDL reduction weren't as clear

PDF: t.ly/6wfc Image
3/
As a result of this early data, the package insert for lovastatin, the first FDA-approved statin, suggested evening dosing.

And the landmark 4S trial did the same, administered simvastatin in the evening.

Insert: t.ly/GsOy
4S: t.ly/9mqS ImageImage
4/
Any many hospitals, including my own, still default to evening dosing for statins.

Here are screenshots for simvastatin and atorvastatin. Image
5/
To understand why evening dosing is often recommended, we must recall the mechanism of action of statins.

These medications work by inhibiting HMG CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway.

PDF: t.ly/US6B Image
6/
Early data using mevalonate (a surrogate for cholesterol synthesis) suggested that...

🔑HMG CoA reductase activity has a diurnal rhythm with peak activity between midnight and 6am.

PDF: t.ly/arrV Image
7/
More recent data using direct measures of cholesterol have found a similar spike after midnight.

This is likely due to a combination of both the circadian rhythms of enzyme activity and increased activity when fasting.

PDF: t.ly/WzGT Image
8/
🔑But the finding that evening administration leads to greater reductions in cholesterol doesn't seem to be a class effect.

For example, one study of atorvastatin dosing found a 47% reduction in LDL with BOTH morning and evening dosing.

PDF: t.ly/VxlL Image
9/
So: simvastatin seems to work better when dosed in the evening while the timing of atorvastatin administration doesn't seem to matter.

What's different about atorvastatin, when compared with simvastatin, that explains this finding?
10/
The most relevant difference is likely half-life. Notice the difference:

Simvastatin: 2-3 hours
Lovastatin: 2.9 hours
Atorvastatin: 15-20 hours

PDF: t.ly/1V01 Image
11/
In meta-analyses, the difference between evening and morning dosing is significantly greater for statins with short half-lives.

For long-acting statins:
➤Total cholesterol is not affected by timing
➤LDL is minimally better with evening dosing

PDF: t.ly/VCg5 Image
12/
Going back to the original data, here's the reason evening dosing is superior for lovastatin and simvastatin:

🔑These statins have short half-lives. By giving them at night, you ensure they work on their target enzyme (HMG CoA reductase) when its activity is highest.
13/
Does it matter that many still default to evening dosing of ALL statins, despite little to no difference for long-acting versions?

Given that some data shows that adherence is higher for morning medications, it just might.

PDF: t.ly/g9mo Image
14/
Before closing, I'm again curious: what will you do now?

Will do prescribe/order/take only in the morning (to increase adherence), evening (maybe it's better), modify based on the statin half-life, or ask the patient what you'd prefer?
15/15
☞ HMG CoA reductase activity is highest overnight
☞ Based on this, statins with short half-lives may be more effective when taken at night
☞ For statins with longer half-lives, timing likely does not matter

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tony Breu

Tony Breu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tony_breu

14 Aug
As I noted in a recent tweetorial, Raymond Pearl reported a lower frequency of cancer in those with evidence of tuberculosis.

This finding led Pearl and others to treat patients with tuberculin.

Unfortunately, Pearl's original study methods suffered from bias.
More specifically, Pearl's study sample contained an overrepresentation of exposed controls (i.e., control subjects who had died from tuberculosis).

This led to an incorrect conclusion that tuberculosis is associated with decreased rates of cancer.
Pearl published a "retraction" in Science.

While arguing that "any serious student of the matter" would agree that TB and cancer are rarely found together in the same person, he admits that concluding a mechanistic connection "may have been erroneous".

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17777405/
Read 5 tweets
14 Aug
1/16
Why do we use a vaccine (BCG) to treat an unrelated malignancy (bladder cancer)?

Can infections really prevent/treat cancer?

Let's find out.
2/
This story begins in 1813 when Arsène-Hippolyte Vautier reported that patients suffering from gas gangrene experienced a decrease in the size of their malignant tumors.

An explanation (or even the causative bacterium!) wasn't immediately apparent.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28202530/
Read 19 tweets
26 Jul
1/15
Why does clostridium difficile infection (CDI) cause marked leukocytosis?

Many of you have likely seen a new WBC >20k and wondered "could this patient have CDI?"

Are you right to wonder? If so, why?
2/
To start, is there a connection?

One of the earliest studies examined patients with WBC >30k. They reported the following rates of CDI:

🔹20% of all cases (excluding those with heme malignancy)
🔹34% of patients with an infectious etiology

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12032893/
3/
In another study included 60 patients with unexplained leukocytosis (WBC >15k) and found:

⚡️58% had CDI⚡️

And: leukocytosis preceded recorded symptoms of colitis in half of the patients.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14599633/
Read 15 tweets
11 May
Great list Avi!

I'll add some relevant links for a few of these.
💻K/Mg repletion often unnecessary

Here is a tweetorial on potassium repletion/replacement.

💻Wilson disease evaluation in acute liver failure often not needed

@ebtapper and @ShaniHerzig wrote a great article in the @JHospMedicine Things We Do For No Reason Series on nondirected testing for inpatients with severe liver injury.

journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
Read 6 tweets
17 Apr
1/6
Does doxycycline protect against clostridium difficile infection (CDI)?

If so, why?

These questions came up on rounds yesterday. Here are some potential answers.
2/
One study found an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.73 for CDI with the use of doxycycline.

A separate meta-analysis supported this finding with an odds ratio of 0.62 with all tetracyclines. The forest plot is attached.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22563022/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29401273/
3/
One potential explanation is that tetracyclines have in vitro activity against C. difficile.

This was demonstrated in a study reporting that 84% of C. difficile isolates had an MIC of ≤0.25 mg/L to tetracycline.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19732094/
Read 6 tweets
2 Apr
1/13
Why doesn't hemolysis cause acute kidney injury as easily as rhabdomyolysis?

I see a lot of hemolysis and can't think of a case of AKI that resulted.

Rhabdo? I immediately worry about AKI.

If heme is the toxic molecule, shouldn't both conditions be equally nephrotoxic?
2/
🔑Heme is contained in both hemoglobin and myoglobin and is the toxic molecule in BOTH hemolysis and rhabdomyolysis.

The mechanism of heme toxicity won't be covered in this thread. Instead, we'll stick with why rhabdo causes more AKI.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31018590/
3/
Before moving on, it is important to note that hemolysis CAN cause AKI.

Historically, massive hemolysis from ABO mismatch was a major cause. Now the causes are more varied.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31668630/
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(