My take on our politics is that demographic change is slowly breaking our society—America was never designed to accommodate non whites with large amounts of political-cultural-economic power. Happening across the west but especially here.
So you get extremely low trust in media and institutions (been falling since the Civil/Voting rights act in the 60s), rampant conspiracy theories (Birtherism, 5G-Covid, Election “fraud”) and political violence (1/6). Its all because of the same thing.
Racial hierarchy is as fundamental to the American experiment as democracy, actually probably way more so. Since it was here long before democracy was. To upset the racial hierarchical norms is, for many, to destroy what America is and represents.
So as the country continues to diversify and particularly as non whites continue to gain political/cultural/economic power, the low trust, conspiracies, and political violence will grow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every country has a ruling, decision making class. And every countru has a founding myth/event/ethos which serves to give that class legitimacy. In the US, that is the story about the founding fathers and their commitment to “freedom,” “liberty,” “equality.”
It is this founding myth from which the US ruling class derives its legitimacy, and thus maintains their power and influence. They rule today because they supposedly maintain these ideals and are the descendants, in blood and ideology, of the founders.
Which obviously means to challenge the narrative of the founders is to challenge the right to rule of the people currently in power. This is a big part of the reason why conservatives fight so hard to protect the narratives surrounding the founders and colonial settlers.
I don’t know how the “Democrats need to stop talking about race” takes still exist. The idea is that it alienates working class whites (sure). But how can they believe refusing to talk about race won’t provoke a backlash of poc/college educated? That we’ll just roll with it?
Its not an unusual or unpopular concept, you hear it from MY, from Shor, etc etc. I think the idea is totally bogus. They can perceive a white backlash to Dems talking about race, but funny how they cannot conceptualize a poc backlash for Dems dropping racial equity.
I also think they dramatically overstate the extent that the white working class can be won back in these highly polarized (because of race) times. Dems aren’t winning back Iowa and Ohio if they start saying Obama and CRT are bad.
Extremism is also relative. Extremists never consider themselves to be so. It is very uncomfortable but important to understand how Nazi Germany was inspired in part by US early racial laws and expansionism. assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/i1092…
Obviously not taught in most schools, it turns the American exceptionalism myth and ethos upside down. It makes people question and the should—how could Nazi Germany’s actions be inspired, even in part, by early American political actors?
Think about it in this way, from the Native American perspective, wasn’t America largely a violent totalitarian regime that could not be trusted? Broken treaties, land theft, genocide?
If you wanted to simplify American history, break it down to its most elementary form, it is a long struggle over the question: “How much power should whites have in society relative to everyone else?” Viewed in that framework and context all events make much more sense.
When you earnestly believe in the ethos, the American myth, about liberty and freedom and egalitarianism and rights you find it hard to understand Trump voters. But when you understand the central question in American history it all makes sense.
Slavery, the genocide of Native Americans, the Civil War, Reconstruction, Jim Crow, the New Deal, Civil Rights, the Southern Strategy, Reagonomics, the Obama coalition, the Tea Party, Trumpism. They’re all about the central question in American history.
“By 1860, there were more millionaires (slaveholders all) living in the lower Mississippi Valley than anywhere else in the United States. In the same year, the nearly 4 million American slaves were worth $3.5 billion, making them the largest financial asset in the US economy”
In the modern post slavery America, Mississippi is among the very poorest states in the country. It is also the Blackest state by %, at nearly 38% Black.
The fight about critical race theory isn’t about education at all. Its about the fundamental question throughout American history—how much power should nonwhites have? Are they legitimate citizens?
The fight about CRT is the same fight as “voter fraud” claims, where the subtext is that poc voters are fundamentally illegitimate (which is why poc heavy counties are where they claim the “fraud” is). Its the same movement as the Tea Party’s reaction against Obama.
Its the same movement as the fight against integration, its the same movement against ending Jim Crow. The anti-CRT folks say that it is anti-American. And if you conflate America with white supremacy, you’re right.