If you wanted to simplify American history, break it down to its most elementary form, it is a long struggle over the question: “How much power should whites have in society relative to everyone else?” Viewed in that framework and context all events make much more sense.
When you earnestly believe in the ethos, the American myth, about liberty and freedom and egalitarianism and rights you find it hard to understand Trump voters. But when you understand the central question in American history it all makes sense.
Slavery, the genocide of Native Americans, the Civil War, Reconstruction, Jim Crow, the New Deal, Civil Rights, the Southern Strategy, Reagonomics, the Obama coalition, the Tea Party, Trumpism. They’re all about the central question in American history.
“How much power do whites have in society relative to everyone else?”
Forgot to add immigration…not just modern times, but historically the US has severely limited non white immigration formally and informally
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“By 1860, there were more millionaires (slaveholders all) living in the lower Mississippi Valley than anywhere else in the United States. In the same year, the nearly 4 million American slaves were worth $3.5 billion, making them the largest financial asset in the US economy”
In the modern post slavery America, Mississippi is among the very poorest states in the country. It is also the Blackest state by %, at nearly 38% Black.
The fight about critical race theory isn’t about education at all. Its about the fundamental question throughout American history—how much power should nonwhites have? Are they legitimate citizens?
The fight about CRT is the same fight as “voter fraud” claims, where the subtext is that poc voters are fundamentally illegitimate (which is why poc heavy counties are where they claim the “fraud” is). Its the same movement as the Tea Party’s reaction against Obama.
Its the same movement as the fight against integration, its the same movement against ending Jim Crow. The anti-CRT folks say that it is anti-American. And if you conflate America with white supremacy, you’re right.
The funny thing about reading conservative media now is they truly feel like their way of life is under siege. They feel like its never been harder to be a white guy. But they don’t use empathy to understand that minorities have felt this and worse for America’s entire history.
I mean for virtually all of American history until very recently minorities were largely shut out of the mainstream economy. Native Americans were removed from their land. Black people were enslaved. Japanese Americans put in camps. All in the past 200 years.
There was the Chinese Exclusion Act. The failure of Reconstruction and the institution of Jim Crow. Mass deportations of Mexican Americans-US citizens-in the 1920s. Refusal to pass a federal anti lynching act. Keeping Black Americans from receiving New Deal benefits.
I want to write a response to this narrative at some pt—the argument that Dems need to focus on economic issues and put social issues on the back burner is a bad one. It presumes marginalized groups like poc will still turnout for Dems if they reduce talk about race.
It also presumes that the Dem position on social issues is untenable while the GOP position is closer to the American mainstream. There’s a wide range of pub opinion polls which show Americans on avg are closer to the Dem position on cultural issues than GOP.
It also doesn’t reckon with the GOP’s disconnect on economic issues. We constantly hear calls for Dems to drop cultural concerns but few calls for GOP to move their economic positions closer to the median voter.
The reason I like watching sports drafts so much is they are essentially selling you hope. In the cynical and outrage fueled world of internet and social media I think hope is under supplied.
A cynic might say you’re delusional, how can anyone have hope in a cruel and self interested world where only the powerful make the rules and have agency? And I would reply that over the past 100 years, the world has made unbelievable strides in reducing poverty & mortality.
Generally when you look at social media it makes you think everything is going to collapse and fall apart. And sometimes things do. Entire governments fail, businesses die, people get hurt. But in the aggregate, are we better off than we were a century ago? Undeniably yes.
I’ve seen a lot of people say “Today’s conservatism doesn’t offer a compelling version of the future for young people.” I think this is a misunderstanding of conservatism as an ideology. Its primarily about status quo maintenance for people already in power.
Most tend to view power strictly in the economic sense. Ruling class as the wealthy. But there’s been more consideration of race/ethnicity, culture, politics as of late. There is an argument to be made that the ruling class in America has historically been white people writ large
When you think of white people, broadly construed, as the ruling class, with an “upstart” non ruling class making political and economic challenges to their power, the Trump movement makes a lot more sense and is much easier to understand.