#SeditionHunters - a must-read, deeply researched WaPo piece on the lead-up to the Jan 6 Capitol attack. Confirms its origins well before the election. Confirms that EVERYONE KNEW the danger: DHS even alerted hospitals to prep for mass casualties Jan 6. 1/ washingtonpost.com/politics/inter…
"While the public may have been surprised by what happened on Jan. 6, the makings of the insurrection had been spotted at every level, from one side of the country to the other. The red flags were everywhere." 2/
The article is hyper-cautious on one point: does not raise even a hint that lack of preparation could mean complicity. But this is the journalism we have been waiting for, for months. Wide-ranging, meticulous, and with the horsepower to grasp the scale of events: 16 reporters! 3/
Bombshell reporting that Congressional Democrats were alert to possible attempts to overturn the election ... already in AUGUST. 4/
The article confirms what we see in video: that militia groups, extremists, white supremacists, radical political activists began coming together in Fall 2020, that the Nov 14th rally in DC was a meet-up across this radical spectrum, a part of wider coordination. 5/
Much of what's here is known by #SeditionHunters, but finally it's being said out loud, in a big national newspaper. And there are new shocks, like this one: Gen Milley worrried that deploying the National Guard would give Trump the opportunity to misuse the armed forces. 6/
The article does throw the FBI under the bus somewhat, letting Pentagon have the last word - will be interesting to see how that plays out as the J6 Committee gets rolling. But this piece is hopefully just the start of the reporting we need so much. 7/
At least one member of the reporting team was at the Capitol Jan 6: @HannahAllam took the definitive footage of the Proud Boys arriving at the Capitol, and followed the crowd as people moved from W to E sides to start synchronized breaches - see thread. 8/
CNN posted a new video of the Minnesota shooting but missed its bombshell. ICE agent Jonathan Ross heads to his own car, turning his back on the supposed "terrorist" (L). He then walks back, filming, into the path of her ALREADY moving vehicle, stops and fires (R). Insane. 1/
Here's the video as posted by X user @GinoTheGhost. Anderson Cooper doesn't notice that Ross was well clear of Renee Good's vehicle when it starts moving. The idiot walked into the path of a moving car while distracted by filming a video. Totally unprofessional. 2/
Cooper doesn't also note how unprofessional it was for Ross to lean into his car and turn his back to what ICE now calls a terrorist threat. Just six seconds after he straightens up, he shoots Renee Good. Nothing here is normal. Camera notes at link. 3/
What's happening in Venezuela is not war but deal-making (and back-stabbing). As VP Delcy Rodriguez assumes power, remember that she was negotiating with Trump in 2025 for this outcome: new boss, same regime. And that she's alleged to be involved in drug trafficking herself. 1/
It's not war when the only people killed are a few civilians and the president's bodyguards - and Russia barely reacts. The Miami Herald says Rodriguez' reached out in early 2025, less than a year after Maduro stole the election - with Maduro's OK. 2/ miamiherald.com/news/nation-wo…
Maduro surely imagined a cushy retirement rather than arrest and extradition. The Miami Herald says Trump nixed that. But Delcy Rodriguez and her brother Jorge succeeded - they now control the presidency and National Assembly of Venezuela, icing out the democratic opposition. 3/
The best take on today's attack on Venezuela is likely the most cynical: that it is staged and transactional. Trump wouldn't attack Russia's ally without permission - but in 2019 Putin offered Trump a swap: Russia cedes Venezuela and gets Ukraine. @davetroy as usual called it. 2/
Most of our politics today has decades-old roots involving Russia. Putin has tried to take Ukraine since 2014. That's why he needed Trump, why Russia paid the influencers who pushed January 6. Troy: today is not "some new sui generis Trump adventurism" 2/
Trump rehashes old actors and old plans - it's the same people who boosted him into office, who cut deals with Putin in 2019, who pushed Jan 6, who surround him now. Fiona Hill's testimony in Trump's first impeachment is as valid today as it was then. 3/ pbs.org/newshour/polit…
Since this ominous video about Trump and his pageants is going viral, might as well note that Erika (Frantzve) Kirk competed in at least 5 of those pageants: Miss Colorado 2009 and 2010, Miss Arizona 2011 and 2012, and then, after she finally won at state level, Miss USA 2012. 1/
The contestants for the 2012 Miss USA contest spent the 2 weeks beforehand at the Trump Tower Las Vegas, "touring, filming, rehearsing, and making new friends". 2/ nypost.com/2012/05/31/mis…
It's likely Frantzve became close with Trump during the pageants because 3 years later she reportedly called her former classmate Tyler Bowyer to offer help with Trump's first large rally, in Arizona in 2015. Bowyer was organizing; he placed her right behind Trump. 3/
Steven Pinker, buddy of Jeffrey Epstein and prominent in the latest Epstein files release, is now awfully concerned about "academics cancelling each other". (Here he's reposting an op-ed by eugenicist nobleman Baron Young, himself 'canceled' for racism, sexism and homophobia). 1/
The Harvard Crimson has been going hard after Harvard professor Pinker, highlighting his creepy appearances in the Epstein files. In this clip Pinker poses with Epstein on his plane while a plaintive little-girl's voice asks "where are you taking us?" 2/
Steven Pinker is the 2nd most prominent Harvard faculty member in the Epstein files, after Larry Summers who was pulled from his teaching role mid-semester when the files came out. Pinker's now acting like he has a reason to worry too. 3/ thecrimson.com/article/2025/1…
@MeidasTouch is wrong here. These images are two different filings in Giuffre v Maxwell, with different dates. In 2024, she re-filed material with Trump's name unredacted. Media covered it; it was a scandal! But, both versions remain up on the DOJ website. No one deleted. 1/
Giuffre's 2024 filing, with Trump's name unredacted, was newsworthy - @JayShah found that Trump had been hidden as "Doe 174" in Giuffre's suit. The documents here were reported on. 2/ businessinsider.com/donald-trump-d…
People should have remembered - you don't forget a sentence like this. But, both documents 1296-17 (from 2022) and 1332-16 (from 2024) remain up. The key point isn't that DOJ is making new redactions. It's that they're releasing little new material. This stuff is old. 3/