1/
Woke @ 3:00 am to do a virtual townhall in Uganda.

What I learned was the true extent of the danger of the mantra "wait for the vax"

In Uganda, schools are still closed. Kids <12 are barred from churches. Vaccine mandates are being implemented, but 0.8% of pop is fully-vaxed
2/
I always thought in poorer countries, they weren't really implementing these policies, which could only ever function in a terribly rich country (with robots).

I was wrong.

Every bad idea is being done there, but 10x worse than it was here. They STILL have lockdowns.
3/
Uganda is implementing a vax mandate w/<1% fully vaxed, and ~6% w/any shot.

The vax mandates (as everywhere) function solely as a method for surgically excluding people from society. In Uganda, that apparently is LITERALLY everyone but the top 1%.
4/
Running for office, you're generally discouraged from doing events outside of your district. This was just a little out of my district :)

But I am so glad I decided to attend. Because what I saw was the bottom of the slippery slope. This NEVER ends.

5/
@_SimonSsenyonga noted that for churches to re-open in Uganda, in addition to all the other pandemic theater, church leaders had to get a "scientific certification."

Even if you aren't religious, understand that this ultimately will be applied to business and everywhere.
6/
And of course, it is revocable. This is what happens with vax mandates. Ultimately all access to society becomes revocable based on whatever new thing the government deems necessary, which will often be predicated on whichever element of it deems needs suppressing.
7/
@WinnieKiiza noted that the country has implemented a vax mandate, but must beg for vaccines. While comments flowing in noted issues of literal starvation.

She warned of a pandemic of illiteracy, following more than a year-and-a-half of kids without any access to school.
8/
Repeatedly, it was brought up that during their endless lockdowns, certain bars are able to open, depending upon who their owners were. That while the populace is told to stay home, their leaders continue to live as they did before.
9/
The global state of affairs can no longer be called "myopic." That is too benign a characterization. This is malign. Our leaders have broken the world, and now they are grinding it into dust beneath their heels.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emily Burns😊 DMs welcome #TeamReality

Emily Burns😊 DMs welcome #TeamReality Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Emily_Burns_V

22 Oct
1/
Thoughts:
- still probably better for at-risk
- kids’ super-power is their immune systems (esp for CoV2). If vax may lessen this, w/no clinical benefit…?
- shows yet another problem w/mandates: create strong incentive to sweep all issues under the rug

boriquagato.substack.com/p/original-ant…
2/
We have seen this happen before, so this is not a wild proposition.

3/
This is why choice is so important. If people make their own choices, grappling w/the risks of incomplete information is on them. When coerced, the burden is on those who make the choice for them. If those people may be wrong, they tend not to be overly inclined to admit it.
Read 7 tweets
14 Oct
1/
What we are currently suffering, is a pandemic of the unelected.

There is no off-ramp for any of these restrictions—and they all know it.

Because the problem is political, the solution must also be. So I'm running for congress.


👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
2/
This is my call to Team Reality. Politicians, the media, the only thing they pay attention to is $$. If they see $$ flooding an anti-mandate, pro-liberty candidate in Rochelle Walensky’s back yard, they WILL pay attention. emilyburns.vote
3/
No one believes this has cross-party appeal, that you can use it to capture the middle. They think it's a Twitter phenomenon. Like it or not, the ONLY way to show them it’s real, is with money. I’ve contributed $250K of my money to this. emilyburns.vote
Read 18 tweets
7 Oct
1/
Just looked @ CDC's AZ school-mask study. What a load of garbage. Here’s why:

-No info on actual # of cases, or # of kids in school
-No info on testing levels
-52% of schools WITH mask reqs were small (<850) vs. 13% in No-Mask Schools
-Case rates 2.4x in no-Mask Areas
2/
When numbers are missing, it tells you something. The key number here SHOULD be, number of cases/child. That they chose outbreaks instead is...fishy. That 52% of masked schools were small, vs. 13% of un-masked, is important. Fewer kids in schools = Outbreak less likely.
3/
It's kind of amazing they needed to do this. The CDC basically set its "close contact" rules for schools to "prove" masks work.

In situations where both kids are masked, a masked contact DOESN'T count as a contact, AND THUS DOESN'T NEED TO BE TESTED.
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
Read 6 tweets
20 Sep
1/
In Florida 99.9% of 65+ are vaxed w/1 dose

Yet, 65+ makes up 63% of deaths (6536) from 7/22-9/9/21.

FL has ~4.4 M 65+. 0.1% unvaxed ~ 4400

If this were a pandemic of the unvaxed, that would mean 150% of them are now dead. Pre-7/22, ~30K FL Cv19 65+ deaths (of 4.4M) or 0.6% Image
2/
It's important to remember the CDC counts anyone as un-vaxed if they are <14days post second vax.

Definitions matter, and the CDC is using this one to paint a false picture of what's happening.

h/t @MisterCommodity @AllenCo66273228
mayoclinic.org/coronavirus-co…
3/
This applies to hospitalizations, too. And one must also remember than in May, the CDC told hospitals to stop testing fully-vaxed people, unless there explicitly FOR COVID.
Read 4 tweets
12 Sep
1/
If the cdc lifted school mask guidance would they be freer to honestly evaluate vax risk for kids?

The cdc routinely ⬇️ Estimates vax risk for kids

New report shows vax Myocarditis for 12-15 boys @ 1:6000 vs CDC 1:15000

4-5x ⬆️ their Covid hosp risk

medrxiv.org/content/10.110… Image
2/
Note, this vax myocarditis is very different from the Covid myocarditis we heard about initially.

86% of these kids were hospitalized for their myocarditis.

The post-covid myocarditis, which shows up in 0.6% of young people had to be found by MRI.

jamanetwork.com/journals/jamac… Image
3/
I do think that the mask mandates are being kept in place to ⬆️ child vax uptake. B/c cdc knows parents want kids unmasked, is this supposedly benign intervention to encourage a better future outcome causing them to be willfully blind to potential harms?
Read 6 tweets
1 Sep
1/
The overall effects of this study are miniscule—0.07% absolute reduction in seroprevalence. But the topline finding is “We decreased seroprevalence by 10%!”

Technically true...

But even this finding is questionable. Let's explore.

poverty-action.org/sites/default/… Image
2/2/
What the study ACTUALLY measures is the impact of mask promotion on symptom reporting. Only if a person reports symptoms, are they asked to participate in a serology study—and only 40% of those with symptoms chose to have their blood taken. Image
3/ Is it possible that that highly moralistic framing and monetary incentives given to village elders for compliance might dissuade a person from reporting symptoms representing individual and collective moral failure—one that could cost the village money? Maybe? Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(