Thread:

We really need to talk about how big an intelligence failure Jan 6 was.

This excellent WaPo piece is a good place to start.

How did this all go *so* wrong? 1/16

washingtonpost.com/politics/inter…
“While the public may have been surprised by what happened on Jan. 6, the makings of the insurrection had been spotted at every level, from one side of the country to the other. The red flags were everywhere.” 2/16
On Jan 2, Donell Harvin, head of intelligence at DC’s Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency (HSEMA), was freaking out enough that he called Mike Sena, his counterpart in San Francisco, who confirmed his office was also awash in warning chatter. 3/16
Sena organized a call for all of the nation’s fusion centers to figure out what they were seeing.

“For the first time, from coast to coast, the centers were blinking red. The hour, date and location of concern was the same: 1 p.m., the U.S. Capitol, Jan. 6.” 4/16
2 days before the scheduled protest, Harvin reached out to *everyone* — FBI, DHS, even local hospitals, warning them to prepare for a possible mass casualty event.

“Empty your emergency rooms, he said, and stock up on your blood banks” 5/16
As early as December 20, a tipster called the FBI with a warning: Trump supporters—believing they had orders from the President—wanted to sneak weapons into DC, overrun the police and arrest members of Congress. 6/16
The FBI passed that tip on to local law enforcement, and decided that it didn’t warrant further FBI investigation.

This brings me to an important reminder:

The CIA has recognized one of the biggest intelligence community failures during 9/11 was a failure of imagination. 7/16
“Angry, what is a ‘failure of imagination?’”

Put simply, it’s the failure to look outside of presupposed comfort zones and think about what *could* happen.

Is it likely for a US President to incite a mob to storm the Capitol? Well, no. Is it possible? Well, obviously. 8/16
This alone is a glaring failure from the. The signs that Trump would stoke violence in an attempt to stay in power were there before he was elected.

*I’ve* talked about that possibility on Twitter for over four years — political violence was a Bannon strategy from early on. 9/16
“The FBI… received numerous alerts of people vowing to violently confront Congress, but largely regarded social media posts — even those discussing bringing firearms, arresting lawmakers and shooting police — as protected First Amendment Speech.”

WHAT? 10/16
Apparently, senior leaders at the bureau worried that any public statements by Wray would be “asking for a desperate president to come after him”

Cowardice. Abdication of duty. Incomprehensible. 11/16
Milley suggested locking the city down and revoking protestors’ permits.

Acting SecDef Miller worried about a “Boston Massacre” type event that could be used by extremists.

Miller described briefings with security officials and Cabinet members as a shitshow.

Ya think? 12/16
DHS flew in Border Patrol agents to protect their DC offices, but didn’t bother to issue a security bulletin or declare a National Special Security Event (NSSE).

During NSSEs (think Super Bowl, Inauguration etc.) the Secret Service takes the lead on security. 13/16
NSSEs both expand resources and streamline coordination. A NSSE mandates the full cooperation of federal and local agencies.

Think about the security you’ve seen for inaugurations, state funerals, State of the Union addresses, etc — that’s how locked down NSSEs are. 14/16
Obviously, 1/6 could have benefited enormously from a NSSE designation, and that’s something that’s being considered going forward. 15/16
This isn’t nearly a comprehensive list all the failures that led to Jan 6, but that’s enough for one thread.

I’m going to do at least one more thread to expand further on this, but I’ll leave you with this for now:

These failures should cost a *lot* of people their jobs. 16/16

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angry Staffer

Angry Staffer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Angry_Staffer

6 Oct
Thread:

Let’s talk 2022, shall we?

Stop me if you’ve heard this before, but 2022 is the most important midterm election you will *ever* vote in.

It’s not hyperbole to say the fate of the Republic hangs in the balance in 2022. 1/8
If we don’t expand our majority in — or at least keep — both chambers of Congress, the country is in serious trouble.

If we lose the Senate, Mitch McConnell gets to block another Supreme Court Justice, and we could ultimately end up with a 7-2 GOP SCOTUS. 2/8
Do you realize how long it would take the country to recover from a 7-2 SCOTUS?

If you’re not thinking at least half a century, you’re not even in the ballpark. 3/8
Read 8 tweets
17 Aug
Good question, let’s talk threat spectrum!

I find it best to think of the threat spectrum as sort of a sliding scale.

All the way on the left side of the spectrum would be “no threat” and all the way right would be “terrorists have weapons of mass destruction”
If you were plotting it from left to right, it would look something like this:

No Threat > Lone Wolves > Coordinated single attacks w/ 100s of casualties > Multi-pronged, simultaneous attack that can kill thousands (think 9/11) > Terrorists have nukes and/or biological weapons
Right now, the Taliban is somewhere between ‘Lone wolf’ and “Coordinated single attack” on the mock spectrum above.

One of the absolute fundamentals of counterterrorism is that you keep pressure on the terrorists to stop them from planning new attacks.
Read 6 tweets
2 Aug
Few random thoughts:

It’s time we acknowledge Covid is almost certainly here to stay and boosters are going to be a way of life.

Delta is too contagious, and too many YouTube Virologists, Facebook Pharmacists, and Parler Physicians in the US are refusing to get vaccinated. 1/X
It’s also not just about the United States — a worldwide goal of zero Covid just flat-out isn’t feasible at this point.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t try.

Unfortunately, the math isn’t in our favor. Also, the longer we delay, the more variants we’ll get. 2/X
If we take Delta’s mean estimated r0 (6.5), that means every person infected with Delta, on average, infects 6.5 others.

Most experts put the required herd immunity threshold to combat something that contagious at roughly 85% vaccinated. 3/X
Read 5 tweets
30 Jul
Let’s talk Delta for a second, shall we?

Most of you probably know by now, but the basic reproduction number, or R0, is how epidemiologist gauge the infectiousness of a particular virus.

It’s also looked at as the average number of people an infected person will infect. 1/X
You may remember early on in the pandemic, Covid-19 was estimated somewhere around an R3, meaning that every covid positive person was likely to infect around 3 more.

Not great, obviously. 2/X
You may also remember talking about how we had to “drive the R down” via methods like masks, social distancing, capacity limits, etc.

The goal is to get R under 1, meaning that every infected person would infect less than one additional person. That’s how you slow the spread 3/X
Read 7 tweets
24 Jul
Let’s talk “unmasking” and the latest Fox News bullshit tornado, shall we?

It’s no secret that the US intelligence community routinely—and lawfully—collects the communications of foreign persons of interest.

So what happens when a US person is caught up in that collection? 1/X
There are strict minimization requirements in place to protect the identity of any United States citizen or permanent resident that is incidentally collected while monitoring a foreign national.

This shows up as “US Person 1,” etc. on intercepts. 2/X
If a senior official feels that the identity of one or more of the minimized US persons is necessary to understand the context of the communications, they can request that the originating (read: collecting) agency reveal (‘unmask’) their identity. 3/X
Read 5 tweets
15 Jul
This is a hell of a read.

According to the Guardian, they have a directive with Putin’s signature on it, confirming kompromat on a “mentally unstable” Donald Trump, and ordering Russia’s intelligence agencies to do everything possible to get him elected.

Let’s discuss. 1/X
The document refers to Trump as an ‘impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex,’ and someone they judge could help promulgate ‘social turmoil’ in the United States.

All true. 2/X
With that being said, it’s important to understand how Russia operates, and, as always, I would urge everyone to not immediately give in to confirmation bias. 3/X
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(