Global oil majors are back in the black—but for how long?
Something is different about this #oilprice spike. Instead of rushing to drill, oil companies are cutting their capex, reducing debt and paying more to shareholders.
What’s going on here? 🧵
Former sources of value have become vehicles for destroying value. Investors—and, we suspect, even company management—understand that more drilling and expensive acquisitions are a bad bet.
High oil prices mean renewable energy, EVs and the variety of industrial moves to decarbonize are incentivized. Even volatility, the short-term problem caused by rising prices, is sufficient to drive calls for more rapid adoption of alternative fuels. ieefa.org/ieefa-u-s-pric…
Competition, geopolitical complexity & climate concerns cloud prospects for the industry, even as prices rise. Over $39T in assets have been committed to fossil fuel divestment & action from activist shareholders is rocking boardrooms. via @MatthewPhillipsnytimes.com/2021/06/09/bus…
Fossil fuel companies will be around for a long time. They face an #energytransition and that they can join—or they can lose value by keeping their fortunes tied to business practices that drive volatility and rising prices.
For the oil industry, making a comeback and coming back all the way are two very different scenarios.
Carbon capture and sequestration (or CCS) is being touted by some as a potential solution for #decarbonization in industries like cement and steelmaking. But how promising of a solution is it? A deep dive 🧵
There is only limited experience with CCS at industrial facilities beyond gas processing. Only one steel mill in the entire world (and no cement plants), capture CO2. Little info is available about how much they capture, and key info about cost and reliability is missing.
Only 3 of 26 CCS projects currently operating in the world have reported any information that would allow their “capture rates” to be determined. Without this information, it’s impossible to show that any existing CCS projects are economically, financially or technically viable.
Harvard’s decision to #divest its $40 plus billion endowment fund from fossil fuels is a precedent-setting event that warrants the attention of decisionmakers globally. Here’s why. 🧵
The complaint continued that the failure of Harvard to divest may be seen as a violation of the law. The issue needed to be vetted using the investigative resources of the @MassAGO. via @thecrimsonthecrimson.com/article/2021/5…
Around the world, we're seeing momentum towards #netzero pick up speed says @MLiebreich. Countries are turning commitments into formal contributions. #IEEFA2021
Are we in a world where countries are meeting their #netzero pledges—or a world in which promises are empty and nothing's being done? We'll look at that question says @MLiebreich. #IEEFA2021