I guess with the google search boom in stagflation and useless fin media stagflation print pieces it was inevitable that someone would opine "Not sure we get runaway inflation but worse stagflation and tax increases are still really bad"
They are indeed. But a big part of what I'm saying is that this scenario happened 50 y ago after the global economy had finally deleveraged from 1932 and debt to gdp had troughed - that's an accommodating climate for your stagflation fears but less so today...
Today, policy mistakes tend to be pro cyclical and accentuate the disdain for commercial risk and reinforce the desire to accept zero or negative prospective returns in order to enjoy the security and benefits-in-kind that flow from risk less T bills
Let's work the Jesse James line, why do you rob banks ? Why hold securities that are deemed commercially risk less ? Cause that's where the money is...Policy has been caught in a hopeless deflationary analogue ever since the GFC, I don't see that changing anytime soon.
And by all means re-invent the future in your head but choose scenarios that meld with the here-and-now and not some historical stuff that is only relevant because it happened a long time in a galaxy far, far away. I prefer the falling forest trees that no one ever sees...
And to think today's blitz began from reading a rock & roll memoir on Primal Scream. Lone wolves go hungry and feed from the unwanted scraps that society discards. But from such garbage they fathom the most powerful art that imagines the future in vistas never before imagined.
Someone asked me about fiscal conservatism being a boon for GBP? Makes me think of the DJ refrain, You gave me a cassette ?? We don't play cassettes no more baby...let me explain. But first we got to behold the v long term chart of Sterling v the $
Little good comes from applying pro cyclical policies in a silent depression. Imo GBP and fiscal conservatism -real or fancied - just downright boring - the GBP level is tantalising - it took a real beating - but currencies don't have value, just levels...
Not like this. Not erratic, one-off pyts that create a chaotic surge in orders that can't be fulfilled because the whole world had been put on a leave of absence; I mean who really thought this was gonna work out well over and above the morality deficit levelling justifications ?
So with the whole world laid off you give the US consumer cash and implore them to spend. BOOM! How are you supposed to measure reality or recurring demand in a science fiction movie? Don't answer that...
Are you Danny De Vito or Robert Wadlow Ie. Short... Or Long equities someone asked me today. Remarkable how hard that question has become. Perhaps it’s too many nootropics today but…
Modern risk taking - the binary bear / bull implied by the question is complicated. Long equities ? Only a tiny few. But first, no procrastination - I’m v long risk. But just what does that mean?
In a silent depression the most profitable risk is long the perception of risk less duration. Leveraged portfolios of USTs have been hot to trot
Today’s FT had me head banging. So few money managers understand money and when the fin press weigh in with their ignorance…well its more than i can handle...especially as I'm taking a sabbatical from the good life
The bond market, think of it as a very busy restaurant, no empty seats or tables, everyone smart, hungry & attentive. Food’s usually good in busy restos. Bond market sets the shape of the curve to reflect incoming policy mistakes or to urge actions be taken.
Rust Bucket..?
Me? You?
A penny for your creative thoughts?
Melancholic moi?
Who you doing?
Remember, I LOVE YOU...
Perhaps, or moving on, I promise I've not been drinking, I've been reading Virginia Woolf's Mrs Dalloway. My new bestie, Angus Fletcher, the wisest men are not on Twitter... inspired me to hallucinate via literature. "Just how far would you go to enhance your returns?", he asked?
Woolf suffered from mental illness and used reading to comfort herself. I’m doing it to hone my ability to imagine tomorrow...
Patience will be rewarded when investing in China. I did warn you that the big guns would come out with reassurance in our financial pages. They need you ! They need naivety. They need your commitment to buy and keep them wealthy. But, hey, remember, no gloating...
Nice stat Aug 2001 (when series begins) to 2021, the MSCI China Index annualised total return 12.3 %, SPX 9.3 %. And the winner is..? Not so sure...is it appropriate to compare 2 countries at very different points in their development?
SPX achieved the same returns 1910 ish to end 1929 - a period marked by a world war but when all the ducks aligned for the US v RoW. 15% if you exclude the WWI and just take the roaring 1920s. So hmm...alright but there's no WoW factor. This ain't proof of anything.