(🔒) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: Evidence Mounts of Team Trump Plot to Occupy the Capitol on January 6

This is without a doubt both the longest and most important report PROOF has ever issued. I hope you'll subscribe, read, and share. A thread follows hereafter. sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaki…
1/ I think I have to start by saying that the article atop this thread likely will take over an hour to read and process. There is no possibility I can do justice to it here, and I hope me threading on it now will not give the misimpression that its revelations can be summarized.
2/ Having said that, I deliberately gave the article an unambiguous title. All the evidence we have—every scrap, all taken from public records and major-media reporting—indicates the plan on January 6 was to force a postponement of the joint session via occupation of the Capitol.
3/ And every scrap of evidence indicates that this plan was jointly established by Trump's legal team and Stop the Steal, and that Trump was aware of the plan and took concrete actions constituting a criminal conspiracy in support of that plan. The plan required paramilitary aid.
4/ To say that the plan required paramilitary aid is *not* to say that those who devised the plan knew in advance whether or not violence would be required. As to that, the view appeared to be that the less said the better. It was simply known that the Capitol had to be occupied.
5/ The article above gathers a mountain of evidence—testimonial, documentary, curatorial—establishing that both Trump's legal team and the Stop the Steal leadership, who together hosted Trump's January 2 pre-insurrection conference call, have confessed to planning an occupation.
6/ The article also goes through Donald Trump's actions before and during the attack, establishing that his actions were explicitly, repeatedly, and unambiguously focused on one thing and one thing only: ensuring that the occupation of the Capitol went on for as long as possible.
7/ Prior to this reporting, it was presumed that Trump's actions were merely spiteful—he wanted Congress (and perhaps the country) to suffer his wrath, through the instrument of his supporters, for as long as possible.

Trump may indeed have been wrathful, but he also had a plan.
8/ As a Trump biographer, I've always said Trump isn't particularly bright, he just has great instincts for self-preservation and self-advancement—the way that I say of my rescue hound Scout, who doesn't even seem to know her name, that her IQ jumps 50 points if food is involved.
9/ So when I say that the evidence confirms "Trump had a plan," I'm not saying Trump devised the plan—he did not—or even fully appreciated all its *implications* (which he may or may not have been able to do, but it's a moot point, as he really didn't care about all the details).
10/ Indeed, the dry run for the occupation plan was masterminded by Ali Alexander—head of Stop the Steal—in Georgia in November. While Alex Jones of InfoWars and Stop the Steal was part of that dry run, as were the Proud Boys, and while Roger Stone would then be brought aboard...
11/ ...for the second dry run in Washington in December—not with more Proud Boys and Oath Keepers—it is not clear that Trump even became *aware* of what was possible until he was alerted to it via Alexander's contacts with the White House in late November and throughout December.
12/ It was during those contacts—and Trump's contacts with his legal team and political advisers in the Oval Office in mid-December—that the bones of a plot involving January 6 emerged. The plot was simple—have GOP-led state legislatures decertify Biden's win by legislative fiat.
13/ PROOF subscribers who've visited the "Podcast" section of the publication and listened to the "November Nightmare" episode of my 2020 limited-run podcast—PROOF: A PRE-ELECTION PODCAST SPECIAL—will know this plot is broadly the one I predicted before the election...in October.
14/ What Trump *hadn't* counted on was that it would be as difficult as it was to get state legislatures to convene "special sessions" to investigate and/or immediately decertify Biden's win in the battleground states, particularly these three: Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Arizona.
15/ The Trumpworld expert on interfering with or forcing special sessions—technically, by January 6 Trump needed both—was Ali Alexander of Stop the Steal. Alexander had spoken to Trump enough times pre-election and immediately post-election that he'd gotten a nickname from Trump.
16/ (That nickname—perhaps for obvious reasons—was "Sammy." Alexander announced it at the January 5 Freedom Plaza rally he helped Matt Couch to MC. If you see pictures of Alexander you'll understand that Trump wasn't being at all creative here, and in fact was being a bit cruel.)
17/ It'll blow your mind—it did mine—when you hear the strategy Alexander had developed, by mid-November, regarding how to *force* a special session *or* disrupt the proper governmental functions of a legislative body. Here's the strategy he'd devised, and shared with Team Trump:
18/
1⃣ Attract a giant mob to the Capitol where the legislators work.
2⃣ Surround the building.
3⃣ Breach the building.
4⃣ Occupy the building.
5⃣ Disrupt all functions occurring within the building until you are (in Alexander's words) "appeased" in all of your political demands.
19/ If that sounds familiar, it should. It's what happened in DC on Insurrection Day.

It'd already happened in Georgia seven weeks earlier, though it wasn't successful—which is why Alexander honed his methods in December and why Trump had to try to coerce Raffensperger by phone.
20/ By January 2 Trump had taken his Raffensperger plot to galactic dimensions, addressing a group of 290 state legislators in a private conference call about which (and I just can't emphasize this enough) his political and legal teams thereafter lied as to *every single detail*.
21/ Trump believed the January 2 call could be enough to force special sessions in sufficient states to decertify Biden's win—he was legally/politically/logistically wrong about every part of that, but he didn't know it or wouldn't see it—so he needed the joint session postponed.
22/ So his team—indeed, he *specifically*—turned to Alexander, who knew how to get that done. But he also turned to his Willard Hotel "war room," and OAN, and his allies at the Pentagon, in ways that make how all this played out between January 2 and January 6 incredibly complex.
23/ There's no need to take my word for it—everything here, as in all PROOF articles, is fully sourced; you can review the sources yourself.

Any PROOF subscriber will tell you—having read prior PROOF reports and (soon) this too—that they know the answer to the January 6 mystery.
24/ I'm thrilled that members of the House January 6 Committee follow the PROOF project. I'm honored that the Committee cited PROOF in its action against Bannon. I hope I've given all readers some sense of what's happening with all this. And PROOF subscribers have the full story.
25/ The 150+ articles at PROOF related to the insurrection are the product of hundreds and hundreds of hours of work. The publication has a $5 subscription—the lowest Substack allows—and if you read all of it, there will be no mystery left as to January 6. sethabramson.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

4 Nov
I don't know anything about this guy. All I know is that I watched him just *one* time—he was doing some chicken-sandwich "taste test" on YouTube—and he was being so aggro and arrogant to his staffers it turned me off immediately. No clue what his deal is. businessinsider.com/barstool-sport…
😳

"In 2020, Madison sent Portnoy a direct message on Instagram complimenting his famous 'one bite' pizza reviews. 'Sick pizza reviews,' she wrote. 'Thanks fly bitch,' Portnoy responded. She was a 20-year-old college student at the time, Portnoy a 43-year-old multimillionaire."
😳

WTF?

"The conversation soon moved to Snapchat and text, where it quickly turned to the topic of sex. He sent her graphic videos of other women he'd slept with, according to Madison, and in messages reviewed by Insider, he pressed her to tell him about her sexual fantasies."
Read 13 tweets
4 Nov
(THREAD) I'm going to itemize every factual inaccuracy in this NYT article—while telling you in advance that none of them will be fixed. I wrote a NYT bestseller on the subject these men have written a story on, so I know *exactly* what needs correcting. nytimes.com/2021/11/04/us/…
ERROR #1: The NYT calls Steele's work "Democratic-funded opposition research." In fact it was first funded by anti-Trump Republicans. After Trump won the 2016 primary, it *later* came to be funded by Democrats. So it was "anti-Trump research" funded by *both* parties' faithful.
ERROR #2: The NYT writes that Steele's work "turned out to be" opposition research funded by Democrats—implying Steele hid the nature of the work from media and the FBI. Not only did he *not* do this, but he *didn't even know who had contracted him*. Fusion GPS never told him.
Read 43 tweets
3 Nov
After how major media overreacted to a couple of races yesterday, they should never again refer to independent journalists or even social media discourse as melodramatic and hyperventilating. Talk about over-journalisming—the reaction to yesterday was preposterously over-the-top.
Before yesterday, everyone in politics agreed Democrats were facing a headwind because of two moderates blocking any action in Congress, the pandemic, and supply-chain issues—all things out of their hands. Today, everyone is pretending to be shocked by mixed-bag election results.
Any journalist who wanted to go on-air today and describe things from yesterday that *genuinely surprised them* was free to do so.

Instead, we got the conventional wisdom from *two* days ago re-packaged as a shocking (shocking!) new development.

Nope—it’s about what we thought.
Read 7 tweets
3 Nov
(🔒) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: Evidence Mounts of Team Trump Plot to Occupy the Capitol on January 6

There's a reason Glenn Youngkin wouldn't let Trump set foot in Virginia. There's a reason Trump is fighting records disclosure. He aided a criminal conspiracy. sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaki…
(PS) In just the few hours since I first published this, I've received a tsunami of tips—from January 6 video of Alex Jones talking about "occupying" the Capitol to more quotes from Trump lawyers about occupation to documents that further corroborate the evidence we already have.
(PS2) Lost in the media focus on a single state-level race yesterday—to the exclusion of historic Democratic wins in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Maine, and other potential battleground states—is the fact that Youngkin won in part by *avoiding* Trump.
Read 13 tweets
3 Nov
I've been watching Periscopes by domestic terrorist Ali Alexander as part of my research for PROOF and can I just say that this man talks about demons and jezebels and curses and hexes and "you got to get woke, people!" more than I've ever heard any Democrat say "woke" or "demon"
This new far right is obsessed with "red-pilling" and being "woke" when these are terms I never ever hear from Democrats, and while we're at it can I say that we've reached the point at which Republicans talk about race *significantly* more than Democrats do? It's all topsy-turvy
I increasingly think when Republicans win it isn't about Democrats, as Republicans don't know what CRT is, aren't experiencing "lockdowns," don't know any Democrat who says "woke"... it's just GOP anxieties projected onto Democrats for lack of the courage to face one's own issues
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
The McAuliffe loss is about McAuliffe, not the Democrats. 2021 is not the year to run a white male Clinton crony who exudes creepy “DC insider” vibes and is charisma-free. Murphy will win in NJ, and Democrats performed well in other states (like NH). Some folks need to calm down.
The supply-chain issues are largely outside Democrats’ control, but are hurting the party in power, understandably. Biden has done all he can with respect to the pandemic, but the Democrats were still going to face the brunt of Americans’ exhaustion with the state of the world.
I just see a bizarre overreaction from the Democrats to yesterday’s results. When Murphy wins in New Jersey, he will be the first incumbent Democrat to win reelection in that state in about 40 years. Democrats won the reddest city in New Hampshire—a critical battleground state.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(