Thread by @MrGoldstein7

Konrad Adenauer's mother was a Scharfenberg and her mother was a... Fuhs. Except that should be Fuchs. The Fuchs were prominent bankers, and they later became the Foxes of England. Sort of like the Reichs became the Riches and Riccis and Ritchies. geni.com/people/Dr-Konr…

Think of Henry VIII's hammer against the monasteries, Richard Rich, who was imported from Germany.

Geni even admits these people in Adenauer's nearest lines were bankers, except it lists them as “bank assistants” or something, instead of bank owners. The usual. They come from Bad Sachsa and places like that, think GoldmanSachs.

The Saxes were Jewish bankers that became nobles way back in time. Adenauer was Jewish on his father's side as well, being a Palm and a Viltz. This links him to Olaf Palme of Sweden, of the same families. Viltz is also admitted to be a Jewish name.

The first thing that comes up when I search on "Adenauer Jewish" is a link to the American Jewish Committee website, where we find the AJC-Adenauer exchange program.
ajc.org/exchangeprogra…

So, as with a previous search on the Rockefellers, we see Adenauer having an inordinate interest in Jewish programs and committees. Funny how these people who couldn't possibly be Jewish just happen to spend 90% of their time on Jewish projects.

Also see the Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung, which is concerned with “energy security in the Middle East and North Africa”. Hmmm. Energy security centering where? Israel, of course.

See this 1960 news item from the JTA archives, with Adenauer slobbering over David Ben-Gurion, pledging cooperation and complete protection, etc. jta.org/archive/ben-gu…

Also remember that one of the first things Adenauer did when he became Chancellor of Germany is send four billion Mark to Israel as “reparations”. Ah, but that's not suspicious, is it? There is no cui bono there.

Adenauer's first wife “Emma” was a Weyer, Jewish again. Her grandmother was Marie Antoinette Weyer, so you begin to get the picture.

Marie Antoinette, wife of King Louis, was from the Brunswicks and Viscontis, among others. The Viscontis were Dorias from Genoa, with the Phoenix as their escutcheon:

So we know who they are.

Emma's father was Emanuel Alois Weyer, which also helps us peg them. Emanuel is a Jewish name, and we have seen in the research on Hitler that Alois is another.

Adenauer's second wife was Auguste Zinsser. Nuff said. She was also a Hores and Balser. The Zinssers were also big bankers in the US, see August Zinsser, President of the Central Savings Bank of New York in the 1800s. Same family as Adenauer's wife.

Like his ancestors, Adenauer came out of Cologne. It is claimed he disliked Prussia, but he was in the Prussian House of Lords by 1917, meaning he was a noble. Curiously, we aren't given his title.

We do know he skipped military duty, though he should have been called up in 1896 or earlier. We are told this was due to chronic respiratory problems, but he lived to be 91. In 1919, as mayor of Cologne and a Prussian noble, he called for the dissolution of Prussia.

Despite allegedly being a devout Catholic, Adenauer was also the prime advocate of the Zentrum, or Central Catholic Party, “leaving the tower”, or breaking from Rome. As such, he became the great enemy of Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber.

Faulhaber was another Jew, noble (ritter), spook, and ghoul, but his battle with Adenauer is instructive. He “was a leading member and co-founder of the Amici Israel, a priestly association founded in Rome in 1926 with the goal of advocating Jewish-Christian reconciliation”.

So although they disagreed about the Zentrum, or pretended to, they agreed about Israel. They also agreed about the Nazis, whom both criticized very tepidly in public but supported the rest of the time.

Strange, isn't it, that these two alleged enemies supported at the same time the Jews and the Nazis. Sort of proves what I have been telling you, doesn't it?

At the rise of the Nazis in 1933, both Adenauer and Faulhaber ordered their people to stand down. Neither the church nor any of the states protested. Why? The Nazis were Jewish nobles themselves.

The rise of Hitler was about scamming the Gentiles one more time, in truly spectacular fashion. The German middle classes were Gentiles being ruled by the German upper class/nobility, which was Jewish/Phoenician. Just like now. Just like always.

So these middle classes were the usual target of government theater. They were the marks, the ones to be soaked.

But the Jews have known for centuries that the Gentiles don't require being put into concentration camps for this soaking: all that is required is fear, and the Gentiles will hand you their entire bank accounts for security. Don't believe me? Look around!

And the best part is, the Gentiles don't even require real events to scare them. The required fear can be created by the newspapers and radio, or now by TV and Hollywood and the internet.

In 1923, Adenauer proposed treason: that the Rhineland should give up on Prussia and join France. This from a Prussian noble, remember.

For some reason (it was all theater) Chancellor Streseman did not prosecute Adenauer, and less than three years later Adenauer was offered the Chancellorship himself. He is said to have declined because Streseman would be staying on as Foreign Minister. Right.

Instead Adenauer became President of the Prussian State Council. That makes sense, right? The President of the Prussian State Council is a guy who allegedly hates Prussia and wants the Rhineland to join France?

Although Adenauer was allegedly not a Nazi and had been a proponent of France, the Nazis mysteriously left him alone. So that story also makes no sense and looks to have been rewritten by the Jewish historians.

We can be sure Adenauer was a Nazi and that the paperwork was destroyed after the War, or by 1949 when Adenauer was brought in as Chancellor. It was fed into the same shredder that swallowed Leni Riefenstahl's paperwork.

Once he was Chancellor, Adenauer argued the strange thesis that Prussianism was the root cause of National Socialism and the rise of the Nazis. Again, this is coming from a Prussian Jewish noble, House of Lords.

Although Adenauer was allegedly never a Nazi, he shared the same main plank as the Nazis: anti-Communism. He had to, because Communism was being sold as the primary bugbear of the world.

Russia had been chosen as the fake enemy of the West after the war, so Adenauer had no choice but to continue that line. The Russians were allegedly Communist, so we had to be anti-Communist. The script said so.

It doesn't matter that Russia was never really Communist. Like Germany and the US, it was fascist and plutocratic, ruled by cloaked merchants. But that truth didn't fit the script, so it was verboten.

No one was supposed to know that the same billionaires crouched behind the funding of Adenauer and Truman that crouched behind Lenin and Stalin and the Nazis.

It is now admitted. You can find the information online without much trouble, but of course they don't teach it in school or run TV shows about it. Since those who do their own research are minimal, they figure few will catch on.

Just as Adenauer had been a silent lapdog of the Nazis, he was a vocal lapdog of the Allied overseers after the War, who wrote his script. He won the Chancellorship of West Germany because he was for joining NATO and keeping all the foreign military bases—especially American.

After Adenauer won, Schumacher called him the “Chancellor of the Allies”. The only thing we wasn't for was Nazi-hunting. He was in favor of letting bygones be bygones, and passed a general amnesty. Move on. About 800,000 Nazis dodged prosecution due to Adenauer.

That is also telling, don't you think? In fact, Adenauer is the one who looked away as previous Nazi generals waltzed in and filled all the top spots in the new German military. He looked away as they formed the Schnez-Truppe, which should have been called the Schnoz-Troop.

These noble Jewish/Nazi generals formed secret organizations and Adenauer wasn't interested. They had their script and he had his.

It wasn't only the military that was composed of ex-Nazis. Adenauer's Secretary of State Hans Globke was a prominent Nazi, writing the Nuremberg Race Laws of 1935 that had allegedly outlawed marriages and sex between Jews and Gentiles.

Even after that made the news in Germany in 1950, Adenauer kept Globke on and nothing was done about it. Move on.

Adenauer also gave Germany's coal and steel production to the Allies in the Treaty of Paris—especially to France and the US. So his dream in the 1920s of presenting Prussia to France on a silver tray ending up coming true after the War.

But since France was also run by US interests, what was given to France soon passed to the Americans. Or, to be more precise, all of Europe and the world was now more firmly in the pocket of Jewish bankers, who had by then chosen the US as their primary base of operations.

In 1950, the Nazi generals drafted the Himmerod Memorandum, which stated that the price of German rearmament was the freeing of all war criminals. And that included public statements from the Allies that “the Wehrmacht committed no crimes in the War”.

But wait. The Germans already wanted to rearm, so who was paying the price here? Where was the tit for which tat? The Germans got to rearm and the Germans got a general amnesty. What did the Allies get?

Well, the Allies wanted both those things as well, or they wouldn't have happened. The Allies wanted to rearm Germany, because it would require billions being spent, enriching the arms companies and therefore the banks.

And they wanted a general amnesty since they were ready to end the theater. Their writers and actors were sick of the charade. So this whole Himmerod Memorandum was another big fake, written to fill headlines, and written with no nod to consistency.

Most people can barely read, much less spot inconsistencies. You can tell them a price is being paid, and then forget to tell them who is collecting.

Due to this fake, 95 of 102 prisoners at Landsberg were allegedly spared the death penalty. While in reality, the theater department was spared the necessity of faking 95 executions.

What Germans most wanted in those years was reunification, and most people outside of Germany forget that Stalin actually offered it to Germany in 1952.

Stalin basically said in 1952 that if the Allies would leave Germany, the Russians would as well, leaving a reunited and neutral Germany with no superpower involvement. It is the Allies that nixed this, so remember that.

Next on Adenauer's Wiki page, they hit the reparations to Israel, and manufacture the story that Ben Gurion was of two minds about taking the four billion Mark. Right. He finally “reluctantly” took it. Oivay caramba, you have to be kidding me!

Some Israelis were so upset by Germans giving them money they tried to assassinate Adenauer. Yeah, sure they did. Menachem Begin was head of Irgun (Israeli military intelligence) at the time, and he is sold as the plotter against Adenauer.

Irgun is basically the bad cop in the Israeli good cop/bad cop theater. They are the loose cannons, the Dirty Harrys, the Martin Riggs of these stories, trotted out whenever Israel needs a manufactured internal opposition like this.

It is all Hollywood all the time with these people. They can't go to the bathroom without creating an alias of some sort.

In 1953, the French voted down the Pleven Plan for German rearmament, but as usual the Allies just ignored them and went ahead with it. No one ever listens to the French.

Plus, it was the French National Assembly that voted on that, and like our Congress it was just a papermache front. France wasn't run by the Assembly anymore than the US is run by Congress.

The French bankers were fine with Germany rearming, since they knew the bases were US bases anyway, so what difference did it make? The bases in all those countries were just there to spend money from the treasuries, so who cared what plans were floated or who voted for them?

Arms had to be sold, so all countries had to be armed to the skies regardless.

In 1954 Adenauer pretended to release some of the Spandau Seven, including Reich Protector of Bohemia and Moravia Konstantin von Neurath, but there is no evidence those people were ever in prison for a minute.

Like the other top Nazis, they were all Jewish nobles from these old Phoenician lines, and those people are permanently immune from all real prosecution.

They may pretend to show up for some fake trials just for fun, as long as it doesn't keep them off the golf courses for too long, but that is about the extent of it.

For instance, von Neurath was also a von Freudenstein, linking him to the Wettin dynasty, and through them to the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas and the Windsors. He was also a von Wurttemberg, a von Baden-Durlach, and a von Holstein-Gottorp, linking us to the Sachs and to the Romanovs.

A Wurttemberg was Queen of Russia with Paul I. So von Neurath wasn't just a Freiherr, he was from a line of dukes, princes, and kings.

Here is how you can tell his trial was fake, just from his whitewashed Wiki page. There it says this:

The key words are “short tenure” and “nominal”. Was his tenure short? No, and they admit that on the same bloody page. Just go to the sidebar, where it says:

Do they think we can't read? They also admit he had full authority (not nominal) up to at least September 1941, which is 2.5 years, which is not a short tenure. Short tenure during war time would be something like two months.

Plus, they give us no proof or indication his tenure after that was nominal. Nominal how? If he was Protector, why was he protector in name only? Who was the real Protector?

We are told Hitler thought Neurath was too lenient and appointed Heydrich as his deputy, who had the real power. But that makes no sense. If you are “stripping someone of authority”, you fire them and give their job to someone else.

Why didn't Hitler just appoint Heydrich as Protector? Do you think Hitler didn't have the guts to do it? According to the mainstream story, that wouldn't make much sense, would it? Was Hitler known for doing things halfway in 1941? Not according to my readings.

So the writers are just spinning us here, and not doing a good job of it. If Neurath was Protector up to late 1943, he should not have found the International Military Tribunal making excuses for him.

Why would they make up this story and continue to lie about it 70 years later? I just told you why: Neurath was a Jewish Prince and couldn't be touched by the judges at Nuremberg or by anyone else. He was never in jail for a second, and neither were any of the other Spandau Seven

Don't think they could fake anything at Spandau Prison? Well, they actually faked everything.

Here is just one example, which is now admitted. As you may know, Rudolf Hess was the most famous inmate there, and he was allegedly kept in solitary most of the time. He was said to be suicidal and mad, except that they admit he lived to be 93! NINETY THREE.

Hess supposedly waited over 40 years to kill himself, hanging himself with an extension cord in 1987. Really? An extension cord. Do you think they had extension cords in Spandau? I guess he also had toaster ovens and leaf blowers while in solitary.

But that's not all. They also admit that many people believed prisoner Hess was an impostor. MANY PEOPLE, including the President of the US. That's right, Roosevelt and Churchill thought Hess was an impostor, and the Brits commissioned four investigations.

I guess that required four coverups, since NO ONE was in Spandau prison. Not Hess or anyone else. Not even the impostor was there, except occasionally for photo ops.

More proof is that within weeks of Hess allegedly killing himself, Spandau was razed to the ground. Demolished, just like Sandy Hook, just like the Twin Towers pile, just like every other fake crime scene you could name.

Not only was Spandau demolished, every stone was turned to powder and dumped into the sea. Wow, that's what I call a thorough destruction of evidence. No hope of forensics after that, eh?

Spandau should have been the ultimate war museum, except for one thing. Someone might notice an anomaly or inconsistency. As we know, these people can't keep their stories straight, so the best policy is a total destruction of all evidence. You just have to take their word for it

That's what Spandau looked like. It was built in 1876 and could take 600 prisoners. But after the war only the Spandau Seven were there, so that huge prison held only seven people. But it still had four directors and over 100 staff, so its cost was high.

For the last twenty years, the prison held only one prisoner: Hess. That's how he was “in solitary”. Even according to the mainstream story, he wasn't in some hole, he was just the only prisoner there, making that “solitary”. But since he was with a huge staff, he wasn't alone.

Now that we know none of the seven were ever there, we have to ask what WAS going on there for decades? No one really knows, since there was a high wall around it, as you see. It wasn't really a prison, it was a secret military camp, so best guess is it was used for Intel work.

But since it was in downtown Berlin, by 1987 this was prime real estate. The building was old and not heatable by modern standards: no one wanted to work there. And besides, refitting it and admitting it as German Intelligence would be too revelatory. People might ask questions.

Best take it down and replace it with a shopping center. Any agents still working there could be relocated to the cheaper countryside.

Just think about it, please. Four directors and 100 staff to watch seven guys sit in their cells? And you bought that? Those 104 people weren't prison guards, obviously. They were agents going to work everyday. Spandau was like a little German Langley in the heart of Berlin.

@threadreaderapp unroll