Critical Race Theory is racism, specifically anti-white racism. Toxic for any kid who is subjected to it, no matter what their background.
It’s just absurd to call any concern about CRT some kind of dog whistle — critical theory is the philosophical underpinning of the Democratic Party. Just ask the smug politicos who chortle anytime someone mentions this stuff: which part of CRT do you disagree with exactly?
When someone tells you they want our children to look at our society and analyze it through the lens of race or gender, that is critical theory. This is often masked as vague calls for more "conversations"
But anyone who has gone through a mandatory HR/diversity training knows exactly what the content of those "conversations" is -- and it's not openmindedness or tolerance. It's a very specific racial narrative that's engineered to make certain people feel worse about themselves
It is a racial narrative that primes unsuspecting people to support wealth transfers (Surprise surprise when many people who go through these mandatory “conversations” come out defending reparations)
It is a racial narrative that says you just have to sit there and take it as a complete stranger hectors you and lectures you ad nauseum because “who are you” to say anything, check your privilege!
CNN and MSNBC can't stop saying this -- they’re saying Youngkin ran on "racism" because people have "anxiety" that public school teachers are teaching their children *that all people of their race or sex are evil*
That half right. Actually, Youngkin ran *against* racism.

But you SHOULD have anxiety that schools are teaching kids that some races or genders are morally superior to others. Because we know this is happening, and it needs to stop.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Blake Masters

Blake Masters Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bgmasters

2 Oct
My poor staffer, I made him follow me up the mountain to where the wall ends. Don’t join my campaign if you don’t want to be fit!
Made it. It’s always just so stark and crazy to see where the wall ends.
This hilltop, about 100m into Mexico, is a cartel observation post. A scout peaked his head out to scope us out, but ducked away before I could get a photo.

From here, he can observe about 50 miles of border. He tells his drug and human smuggler buddies when to cross.
Read 5 tweets
2 Oct
Went to see the border in Cochise County, Arizona. Thank you to Sheriff Dannels and SGT Williams. Quick thread
Look at all the steel just sitting there on the right. On Jan 20, Biden ordered border wall construction stopped.

A little border patrol dark humor — these corridors are known as “kill zones” because when they stretch for miles, it exposes their vehicles to potential ambush
This is federal land, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronado_… in the Huachuca mountains. The federal park rangers, under Biden admin instruction, don’t enforce immigration law. Cartels have more or less free reign to move people and drugs through.
Read 5 tweets
23 Sep
The Arizona audit report comes out tomorrow. I’m very interested to read it.

But whatever the audit finds, we have to remember: even before Maricopa County started counting ballots, the cards were stacked against us.
First: COVID gave the left an excuse to change voting procedures. State election laws were ignored or altered, they flooded the zone with mail-in ballots (my colleague received 4 ballots, in multiple states), lowered sig verification standards, key deadlines, etc.
In August & Sept, you started to see news headlines warning us — you might say priming us — oh don’t expect results on election night! This election will take *weeks* to adjudicate. (Nevermind that in a first-world country, we ought to know results within 24 hours) ImageImage
Read 17 tweets
14 Sep
Well what a surprise. All it takes to see how a mail-in voter voted in the CA recall is to shine a weak cellphone flashlight through the back of the envelope.
Suppose you wanted to use this tiny flaw in an otherwise *perfect* election system to throw out the ballots of people who voted the wrong way. What would you do?
You would probably push hard to encourage voting by mail. You’d push to extend the voting period for weeks in advance of the election. And you’d push to allow ballots to come in for days afterwards (it’s 7 days in California!)
Read 6 tweets
21 Aug
A federal judge in Nevada just struck down the law that makes it a crime for deported illegal aliens to illegally reenter the country.

This is an obvious law that any self-respecting country should have, but the judge found it… you guessed it… racist!

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
This is a case study in the intellectual sickness of America's ruling elite.

It goes without saying that the ruling is horrible. (It even calls itself "unprecedented"!) Read it: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2104…
The legal theory here is so bonkers even far-left Judge William Simon rejected it (Simon previously enjoined President Trump's immigration policies and gave the ACLU special riot passes in Portland). Worth a read, if you can look past the virtue-signaling. webshare.law.ucla.edu/CILP/Machic_de…
Read 13 tweets
2 Jul
Republicans are always celebrating small, often narrow legal wins as "MASSIVE VICTORIES."

Too much defense, not enough offense. This mentality ensures that, over time, the left wins.
Take yesterday's SCOTUS decision upholding AZ's ban on ballot harvesting. 100% the right result. It's good the AZ law was defended.

But it's purely defensive. If we lose a few state leg seats and get a Dem governor, boom: ballot harvesting is legal again in AZ.
This happens a lot with religious liberty cases.

Take the Bladensburg cross case, in 2019. Does a 40-foot WWI memorial cross on state land violate the 1st Amendment? No, SCOTUS said, 7-2, because... the cross is old and has a secular meaning. What? With victories like these...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(