Charles Gaba ✡️ Profile picture
Nov 3, 2021 25 tweets 17 min read Read on X
📣🎉 AND WE'RE OFF!

My official 2022 #ACA Open Enrollment Guide: Here's the most important stuff to remember when you go to #GetCovered!
acasignups.net/21/11/03/and-w…
1. MOST WILL HAVE MORE TIME BUT YOU STILL SHOULDN'T DELAY!

The final deadline has been extended by a full month in most states, but in order to have your COVERAGE START IN JANUARY you should still *ENROLL* BY DECEMBER 15th!
Here's the official enrollment deadlines for every state + DC. (Note: A few of these may change):
2. AVOID JUNK PLANS & SCAMS; MAKE SURE YOU ENROLL IN AN OFFICIAL ACA POLICY.

There's lots of questionable website selling questionable policies these days. Stick to *official* ACA exchanges or *authorized* enrollment partners only!
Here's the #ACA exchange sites for every state:
CA: CoveredCA.com
CO: C4HCO.com
CT: AccessHealthCT.com
DC: DCHealthLink.com
ID: YourHealthIdaho.org
KY: Kynect.KY.gov 🆕
ME: CoverME.gov 🆕
MD: MarylandHealthConnection.gov
For ALL OTHER STATES, use HealthCare.Gov!

(Alternately, you could also use HealthSherpa.com or W3LL.com, which are authorized #ACA enrollment partner sites)

⚠️ You're ONLY eligible for financial help if you use an official/authorized ACA site!
3. OFF-EXCHANGE ENROLLEES: THIS IS THE YEAR TO SWITCH TO ON-EXCHANGE COVERAGE!

Thanks to the #AmRescuePlan, millions who are paying full price for off-exchange plans are now eligible for enhanced #ACA subsidies...but they have to enroll ON-EXCHANGE to take advantage of this!
Between ~2.3 - 3.0 million Americans are enrolled in #ACA plans *OFF-exchange*, which means paying full price...

...but for 2022, MANY of them would be eligible to save THOUSANDS of dollars by moving ON-EXCHANGE (including 260K in California alone)!
acasignups.net/21/11/02/time-…
📣 4. MILLIONS MORE NOW QUALIFY FOR FINANCIAL HELP...AND THOSE WHO ALREADY DID QUALIFY FOR MORE!

Middle class folks used to have to pay full price, & help for many lower-income folks still wasn't generous enough. Thanks to the #ARP, #ACA plans are now affordable for *everyone*!
This table shows the % of household income your premiums were capped at under the original #ACA subsidy formula vs. the more generous #ARP formula.

Middle class households are now capped at no more than 8.5% of income, & lower-income enrollees pay far less (or even nothing)!
5. TEN STATES OFFER *ADDITIONAL* SAVINGS *ON TOP OF* EXPANDED #ARP SUBSIDIES!

In addition to the expanded/enhanced savings thanks to the #AmRescuePlan, 10 states have their own programs offering additional financial help for lower- (& sometimes middle-income) enrollees!
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Minnesota, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Vermont & Washington are all either offering additional supplemental financial help or have their own special high-quality healthcare coverage plans for low-income enrollees (or both)!
6. FOR LOWER-INCOME ENROLLEES, SILVER IS THE NEW PLATINUM!

If you earn < 200% FPL (~$26K if single; ~$52K for a family of 4), make sure to enroll in a SILVER plan to get SUBSTANTIALLY lower out of pocket costs!

"CSR Silver 94" or "CSR Silver 87" are effectively PLATINUM plans!
There's two types of federal #ACA financial help: Premium tax credits and "Cost Sharing Reductions" or CSR, which cuts down deductibles/co-pays...in most cases making these SILVER plans effectively PLATINUM!
acasignups.net/21/03/30/its-t…
7. FOR *MIDDLE CLASS* ENROLLEES, *GOLD* PLANS MAY COST LESS THAN SILVER!

It's a long, dumb story, but the bottom line is if you earn *over* 200% FPL, some Gold plans are a better value than Silver and may actually cost less in premiums...or even not have any premium cost at all!
.@bjdickmayhew has found 820 counties where at least one Gold plan costs less than the benchmark Silver plan *even at full price*...and thanks to a pricing strategy called #SilverLoading, this means many people earning > 200% FPL can get a FREE Gold plan!
acasignups.net/21/05/15/my-si…
8. FIVE STATES* STILL HAVE THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL MANDATE!

The FEDERAL penalty may be gone, but CA, DC, MA, NJ & RI all still charge a financial penalty for residents who don't have #ACA-compliant healthcare coverage (unless they have an exemption).

*Yes, I know DC isn't a state.
Here's how much you'll have to pay in those states if you go the full year without having #ACA-compliant healthcare coverage next year (and don't receive an exemption):
9. MANY STATES/COUNTIES HAVE MORE CHOICES THAN EVER.

The days of worrying about "bare counties" are gone. Dozens of insurance carriers are expanding their coverage areas in 2022, entering new counties & states while offering more plan options.
Here's a list of carriers which are joining (or rejoining) new #ACA markets for 2022 from @LouiseNorris:
healthinsurance.org/blog/how-new-c…

Of course that many options can get confusing, which is why it's great news that...
10. THE NAVIGATOR PROGRAM IS BACK AT FULL STRENGTH, BABY!

The HHS Dept. has upped grant funding to dozens of qualified health insurance navigator programs nationally for 2022... especially for underserved communities. More help & guidance is here!
Here's the details along with a full list of 2022 #ACA navigator grantees for each state which utilizes the federal ACA exchange (state-based exchanges have their own navigator budgets & programs):
acasignups.net/21/08/27/cms-a…
⚠️ 11. ABOVE ALL ELSE: DO *NOT* LET YOURSELF BE PASSIVELY "AUTO-RENEWED!"

It's always been a good idea to *actively* shop around to see whether there's a better value available, but that's more true than ever this year! Don't leave money on the table; SHOP AROUND & save!
12. If you find this thread or my work at ACA Signups useful and want to support it, you can do so here either once or monthly, thanks!

P.S. Make sure to #GetCovered!
acasignups.net/support

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charles Gaba ✡️

Charles Gaba ✡️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @charles_gaba

May 12
Let's see here...a semi trailer (lower right) is roughly 50' long, so the venue is roughly 9 trailers x 4 trailers, or 450' x 200', or 90,000 sq. feet.

Of course the rear 1/3 is almost empty, but there's also some people lined up in the upper left, so call it ~80% full...

Image
Image
So, that's perhaps ~72,000 square feet of "tightly packed" people. According to this article, in a tightly-packed crowd the avg. person takes up ~4.5 sq. feet.

That would mean perhaps 16,000 people.

.cleveland.com/datacentral/20…
Now, the trailers I used are slightly closer to the camera than the people in the crowd, so I may have to adjust for scale a bit. If we bump it up by, say, 25% you get 20,000 people or so.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 20
🧵 People have asked me why I started an organized project to raise money *directly* for Democratic candidates up & down the ballot when there's already so many other organizations out there doing this. There's a couple of reasons. 1/
The first is that most of the existing organizations/PACs/etc seem to (in my view) *either* focus ONLY on the true swing districts *or* they raise money for races which are clearly unwinnable without being up front about how long the odds in those races are. 2/
I try to walk the line between these--for district-level races I cast my net wider than most "tossup only!" advocates, but not absurdly wide; for statewide races I *do* include deep red states but also make it absolutely clear that those races are *very* long shots. 3/
Read 26 tweets
Mar 7
📣 I'm just $6,300 away from raising $300,000 for Democrats up & down the ballot!

Help me push the total over the top by the end of this evening's #SOTU!

Pick a page & donate today!

(all donations go to the campaigns listed; none goes to me)
#Blue24

Blue24.org
📣 HELP KEEP THE SENATE BLUE (& also chip in for President Biden) HERE:

.secure.actblue.com/donate/senateb…
📣 HELP FLIP THE HOUSE BLUE (& also chip in for President Biden) HERE:

.secure.actblue.com/donate/housebl…
Read 13 tweets
Dec 16, 2023
A little fun Die Hard trivia for those who don’t know:

The first Die Hard was based on a 1979 novel called Nothing Lasts Forever by Roderick Thorp. In the novel McClain’s character was named Joe Leland. This was a sequel to a 1966 novel by Thorp called The Detective. 1/
The Detective had been made into a film starring Frank Sinatra as Joe Leland in 1968.

This means Bruce Willis plays the same character as Frank Sinatra.

In fact, the studio was contractually required to offer the role to Sinatra if he wanted it. Sinatra was 73 at the time.
As for the novel Nothing Lasts Forever (title since changed to “Die Hard”), it follows most of the same storyline and characters, but with a few VERY important differences…

1. Leland is about 15 years older

2. Holly is his daughter, not his wife
Read 5 tweets
Dec 6, 2023
Holy fucking shit.

This may be the first and likely only time that I give @RepStefanik sincere praise.

As she openly states, this was the easiest softball question she possibly could have asked, and all three of them completely flubbed it.
The question she asked: "Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate your university's code of conduct regarding bullying & harassment?"

The answer is YES, for fuck's sake.
"Are puppies cute?"
"Yes."

"Do owls exist?"
"Yes."

"Are there hats?"
"Yes."

"Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate your code of conduct?"
"Yes."

The only way this could be more disturbing would be if it DOESN'T violate their code of conduct.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 15, 2023
“Anonymously signed.”

ANONYMOUSLY. SIGNED.
Image
How does the @nytimes know that these are actual federal officials who actually signed it if they did so “anonymously?”

Does that mean the Times is redacting their names? Or does it just say “signed, 400 officials” at the bottom of the letter?
@nytimes I’m not being snarky here—I can’t read the original NY Times article without a subscription; do they clarify how they verified that these 400 people actually are federal officials and that they did in fact sign off on the letter in it?
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(