The primary target of Lily Cade's manifesto is trans women by far, but I do think it's worth discussing that even I had no idea about the portion related to trans men until I read the full manifesto. Discussing both does not minimize the greater attack against trans women.
I actually think discussing both, and how they interplay with each other, is much more illuminating than discussing either in isolation. The rhetoric Cade uses is not new - it's recycled from the same double-sided misogyny that is always weaponized into transphobia.
Because besides the overt racism, the transphobia, there is one overarching theme - misogyny and a commitment to traditional gender roles, to be enforced with sexual and sexualized violence.
The full blog post can be found here. Please use extreme caution when approaching it, for transphobia, transmisogyny, rape, violence, death, pedophilia, racism, sexual assault and more.
And you may ask yourself, why does this matter? Why are we still talking about this? 1) The BBC used this person as an expert source on trans issues. 2) These views (and their underlying philosophy) are not at all uncommon among the "gender critical". 3) Silence is compliance.
TW homophobia, misogyny, transphobia, transmisogyny, pedophilia, rape, bestiality, racism
Cade repeatedly calls for men to step in and "protect" women. This is done with rampant homophobia and an insistence that "real" men follow traditional gender roles.
She specifically calls for cis men to attack trans women, who she claims are coercing AFAB children into transitioning. This is both the transmisogyny of painting trans women as dangerous and the misogyny of painting AFAB trans people as "children", incapable and impressionable.
Transphobia in general relies on the interplay of these two narratives; that trans women are dangerous, and that trans men are naïve. These reflect the traditional gender roles transphobes ascribe to; they believe that men are inherently dangerous and women inherently weak.
The calls to attack trans women are seen as the appropriate response to the perceived inherent danger and aggression of men. The calls to ignore and belittle trans men are seen as an appropriate response to the perceived weakness and naivety of women.
It is important to draw these links between "gender criticism" and misogyny, as "gender critics", including Cade, claim that their rhetoric is in the name of feminism and "protecting" women.
TW misogyny, transphobia, transmisogyny, pedophilia, rape
But this "protection" only extends to women who fulfill traditional gender roles as well. As Cade rages against any man she perceives as "not manly enough", so she rages against "women" she perceives as "traitors".
She rages against trans men and AFAB nonbinary people, labelling us as traitors, specifically for not being sexually available or servile. Her insults are based almost entirely in sexuality and slut-shaming.
Is this your feminism?
TW rape, misogyny, transphobia
She also prescribes corrective rape to fix trans men and AFAB nonbinary people. This has a history both deeply rooted in misogyny and transphobia, explained further in this excellent thread.
As with all transphobia, Cade describes the deviation from gender roles as being the greatest evil. Trans women, trans men and nonbinary people are both not man enough and not woman enough to fit in the prescribed roles those like Cade demand.
This is one particularly illustrative example of how transmasculine and nonbinary erasure, transmisogyny, transphobia, misogyny and rape culture are all inseparable and deeply intertwined. There is no feminism that excludes trans people, and does not fight for trans women.
This matters. It matters because Cade is far from the only one. It matters because this rhetoric is currently being used to attempt to recruit people you know to the "gender critical" movement. Fight back with us.
I really hate the term "folx" because it is the embodiment of missing the point entirely as to what trans people actually need in terms of language adaption.
What I mean by this is that it's performative. Changing "folks" to "folx" doesn't make it more inclusive, because "folks" is already gender neutral. Using "folx" is an empty signifier.
Those who use "folx" to include trans people tell on themselves that they don't include trans people in "folks", meaning that they see us as an other, separate from the general population, not included in human variation unless specifically noted.
Quick reminder that for the month of October, absolutely EVERYTHING in my shop is 50% off!
This will also be a mini-thread of some of my spookiest patterns. 🦇👻 Get them before they're sold out! etsy.com/shop/MascMasks
There's discourse so I'll say this; transmisogyny and transmasculine erasure are the same biases that play out against different groups. They are intrinsically connected.
This means that transmasculine people should care about transmisogyny. This also means that transfeminine people should care about transmasculine erasure.
I've written on this issue before - all too often, transmasculine erasure is practiced in trans spaces. This is especially devastating as it comes from those who we hope would be our allies.
For those of you who are not aware, a piece of extremely transphobic legislation passed the Texas house yesterday, #HB25. Over on @StepUp4Trans I'm going to discuss the exact nature of what happened and its implications, but here I want to get a bit more personal. 🧵
I want to talk about why this happened. Because I listened to 6+ hours of legislative proceedings yesterday of people who hate trans kids, especially trans girls, and I am appalled.
This happened because it was allowed to happen. This happened because there won't be consequences.
The thing that struck me most about the proceedings was that even though there were impassioned speeches by trans kids and their allies, even though there were statistically backed, logical arguments against the bill, it didn't matter. The bill passed.
Happy (early) Halloween! To continue with my series on bats, today we'll be talking about the sociology and biology of the spookiest bat of all - the vampire bat.
Part of the reason bats are so associated with Halloween is because the Victorian English public became aware of many varieties of bat with nose and ear fringes at the same time as Halloween was gaining popularity.
While we now know that these features are primarily used to channel sound for echolocation, Victorian European naturalists were frightened by these features and believed they indicated bloodsucking tendencies.
Today is #NationalComingOutDay, and I've been waiting all year to discuss some thoughts. I hate National Coming Out Day. 🧵
There are a few reasons why but the biggest is this: coming out day places all the responsibility on the queer person to come out, and none of the responsibility on cishet people to do better.
So if you're queer - I see you and I value you, whether you're out or not. You don't owe anyone information on your gender or sexuality. It's not "lying". Please don't feel pressure to come out until you're ready, really ready. I promise it's okay to wait if you're afraid.