FBI busts Igor at @Brookings under Durham investigation. As we suspected, the Russian collusion narrative was a baseless, debunked conspiracy theory all along. nytimes.com/2021/11/04/us/…
“The inspector general report also said that a decade earlier, when Mr. Danchenko worked for the Brookings Institution, a prominent Washington think-tank, he had been the subject of a counterintelligence investigation into whether he was a Russian agent.”
Igor is formerly at @Brookings, but everyone knows that once you enter the Brookings club, you’re “always” a Brookings person.
Let’s see, suspected as a Russian spy while at @Brookings a decade ago. That’s when Strobe Talbott ran the place. Strobe was Bill Clinton’s former roommate at Oxford who got his big break in journalism in Moscow from KGB officer Victor Lui. Lui’s job was to recruit journalists.
Trash journalism from NPR's @davidfolkenflik & @TomDreisbach. They falsely claim, without naming me but naming my employer in a hyperlink, that I "concluded Antifa led the charge [on the US Capitol] in disguise." That is a lie. I concluded no such thing. npr.org/2021/11/03/105…
I did say that I saw "a few young men" whom I "presumed to be Antifa or other leftist agitators," and who I presumed "were Antifa or something similar." I also stated that "that entire afternoon I saw none of them act aggressively or cause any problems." thefederalist.com/2021/01/14/i-s…
NPR's @davidfolkenflik and @TomDreisbach said my assessment was "based on rioters' body language." This is true, except that I didn't see them riot. More NPR sloppiness. So NPR obviously read my eyewitness account in @FDRLST, but chose to distort it 180 degrees.
Daily Mail: "One of the experts quoted in the [@TuckerCarlson] documentary, J Michael Waller...'During the Cold War, I infiltrated Soviet international front organizations for the purpose of causing provocations that would discredit the Soviets,' he said." dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Afterthought: As a US senator, Joe Biden was echoing some of those Kremlin active measures themes. One of the Americans helping the Soviets at the 1986 KGB event was a congressional staffer, Barbara Lee, who is now a Member of Congress. @RepBarbaraLee
"Having been trained by professional agitators in the past, I saw [J6] as a coordinated effort [by] different cadres of agents provocateurs and other troublemakers who had a sort of military-like precision in what was to become a storming of the Capitol." dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Poll results from June and October show the American public never bought the J6 'insurrection' narrative. amgreatness.com/2021/10/31/ame…
Take a look at the results from June and October. Of the Democrats polled, not even 1/3 described J6 as an 'insurrection.'
Here's the breakdown for the two public opinion polls about describing J6. The figures exceed 100% because respondents were allowed to give 3 answers. Fewer people chose words describing grave crimes against the country, opting for less serious offenses as proper descriptions.
On Tucker tonight, @ElijahSchaffer shows that J6 provocateur Ray Epps is wearing the same gear that I reported on January 13 @securefreedom, and January 14 in @FDRLST. Same for the young man in the backward MAGA hat.
It was just a cameo appearance on Tucker. Stream the whole episode for free at TuckerCarlson.com.
"I’m thinking, the whole world is promoting diversity."
Refugee from Tibet who became NYC cop then became enemy spy for ChiComs, and suggested using "diversity" fad to recruit more people to betray. theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/…
Powerful article in the Guardian: "How China controls thought and speech beyond its borders."
"Every arm of the PRC government has been called upon to join in the work of influencing opinions, stifling speech and controlling dissent within and beyond its borders."
Sounds like Miles Guo Wengui, doesn't it?
"More numerous than these blatant attacks are the incidences of harassment and intimidation. Exiles and activists all over the world have reported threatening phone calls and cyber-attacks..."
'No strategy for victory. At least, not for the Good Guys.' My take on why the Pentagon has no definition of 'strategy' or 'victory.' jewishpolicycenter.org/2021/10/13/no-…
2) Excerpt: 'Victory,' as the Pentagon defines it in its Dictionary of Military & Associated Terms, is – well, it’s not there.
It doesn’t exist.
The Pentagon has no official definition of victory.
The very word itself doesn’t appear once in the more than 350-page dictionary.
3) "the Pentagon dictionary has no definition for 'enemy.'
"The hole is right there on page 74, like a missing tooth, between 'enduring location' and 'engage.'