1 of 16/ Wouldn’t it be simpler for President Biden to just tell the truth about why oil prices have risen, since its mostly not his fault? Here’s a script outline he could consider:

WARNING: Non-partisan parody follows. My apologies in advance to everyone offended.
2/ Oil has a 150 year history of being a deeply cyclical commodity. Buy Bob McNally’s great book “Crude Volatility” that eloquently and entertainingly brings this reality to life. RN, it’s mostly good ole supply/demand.
3/ Oil industry CAPEX was slashed due to traditional investor disdain following a decade of poor ROCE and stock price performance. Shale supply has suffered as a result. Why would anyone buy an oil equity when FAANG + TSLA + Crypto are the future!
4/ Yes the ESG crowd is after Big Oil. But the impact of ESG on 2021-22 oil supply is minimal. This is really about traditional investors demanding a much better ROI. In part because there is legit concern long-term demand could erode as the world considers CO2 reduction steps.
5/ OPEC+ did cut supply when oil fell to -$37 to try to mitigate the worst of the over-supply...kind of like a COVID CARES relief check for the oil industry. OPEC+ actually managed the downturn well in creating some oil price stability in 2H2020-1H2021.
6/ Now, OPEC+ doesn’t want to admit it but they are nearly back to full production. They want us to think they have more oil ready to go so we’ll keep calling them, and protecting key countries.
7/ Yes, my Administration took some high-profile steps in our early days to cancel KXL and delay federal drilling permits, but people please, this was just to appease our progressive environmental wing. It had like zero impact on 2021-22 oil supply.
8/ We do sincerely care about addressing climate change risks. But we are in a box right now because we don’t want to be seen as promoting desperately needed domestic shale supply when we want to reduce long-term CO2 emissions.
9/ So, we are hitting the easy button and blaming those in the Middle East and Russia, which most Americans are naturally wary of anyways.
10/ I was just at COP26 listening to some, ummm, riveting speakers. Unfortunately, some unaccountable UN bureaucracy decided to include domestic oil production in our nationally determined CO2 contributions.
11/ As a result, even though reducing domestic supply would simply lead to higher supply in other countries that don’t care about climate as much as we do for no net global impact on CO2, we are in a bind. Rather than level with you, we prefer to blame OPEC+.
12/ I am definitely not going to touch the 3rd rail topics of banning SUVs or taking any steps to moderate American oil demand. For this, the easy button is blaming evil Big Oil companies. That industry doesn’t even defend itself...easy pickings!
13/ Global bureaucrats have also created an accounting fiction called “Scope 3”, which means we can blame oil companies for your use of their product to live a modern lifestyle.
14/ We won’t blame auto companies for creating SUVs. We won’t mention how the Global South has suffered due to a lack of fossil-fuel enabled GDP growth. We will only blame Big Oil for the negative CO2 externality of fossil fuels.
15/ So, how do we get out of this mess? We all know a real wildcatter drills wells. They don’t do this stock buyback mumbo jumbo. High oil prices are the best cure for high oil prices. That transient stuff Fed governors talk about applies here as well!
16/ Hang in there. I know the American people are tough. We have been through worse. If you don’t like me, remember, we could still have the last guy in charge! And, there are scarier people than me in my own party. And forget it, Manchin will never be President!
PS/ This is not a rebel song or a political post. This is a Twitter opinion, undoubtedly conflicted and surely wrong, on why I think oil prices have rallied. So relax, and save the hate for a future tweet about structural ROCE improvements.
PS2/ I have never tweeted about the Fed…nor should I. I was trying to make a sarcastic comment about the transient nature of inflation, consistent with rest of post. We aren’t out of low cost oil, but there is no appetitive for growth, so oil px gain also likely not transient.
PS3/ Bulk of pushback is on ESG impacting N-T. I still disagree. Reinvestment rates are 30%-40% vs 100%-130% historically. Plenty of self-funding available. No appetite for it as all investors demand cash back. ESG/policy is a L-T risk that can lead to sustainably higher oil px.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with arjun⚡️murti

arjun⚡️murti Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ArjunNMurti

29 Oct
1 of 10/ We badly need a new a narrative around climate and energy, if the goal is to have reliable, affordable energy the world needs with less CO2. The current “Oil is Evil and the New Tobacco” playbook, IMO, is driving a worst of all worlds outcome: Higher prices, Same CO2.
2/ Believing that we will have less CO2 if we could simply force oil companies to address “Scope 3” emissions is a fairy tale. You probably can succeed in killing the western oil industry as has happened with US coal. But the CAPEX, jobs, and CO2 will only shift to other regions.
3/ Does anyone know what year global Coal production peaked before its rapid decline following the demise of the Appalachia coal industry? This is of course a trick question, as it hasn’t happened yet. The jobs and CAPEX simply shifted to China and India.
Read 10 tweets
25 Oct
1 of 8/ Energy Transition public policy and ESG pressures - the best thing going for the oil & gas sector

The unfolding energy crisis is unlike any prior. Normal investor angst about poor ROCE have been turbo-charged with a “worst of all worlds” public policy and ESG backdrop.
2/ We are not devoid of low-cost oil or nat gas resources, as we were in 2003-2010. But exactly no one wants higher CAPEX. Traditional and ESG investors, climate activists, and US/Canada/EU governments all argue for limiting oil & gas CAPEX.
3/ Incredibly, important media outlets are expressing surprise in their headlines when leading banking firms express a willingness to stick with oil & gas clients. Pressure is mounting to move beyond Coal and include Oil & Gas on the “taboo for bankers” list.
Read 8 tweets
17 Sep
1 of 11/ Energy lies, damn lies, and politicians...Part 1.

This is a non-partisan look at energy sector falsehoods, mis-truths, and outright lies told by politicians, industry participants, environmentalists, and Wall Street analysts.
2/ ENERGY LIE: Gasoline prices are high due to “price gouging” and “manipulation” by oil companies (implication: by Big Oil).
3/ TRUTH: This has been investigated many times over many decades and is simply false, nevermind the times WTI has o/p gas w/o anyone decrying low margins. Will Ds go after the c-store chains that actually set local gas px? Big Oil owns only a small % of gas stations in the USA.
Read 11 tweets
6 Jul
1 of 6/ OPEC+, Climate, and N. America Oil & Gas

The weekend noise around OPEC+ highlights the critical importance of a healthy N. America oil & gas industry, without which the world is unlikely to alleviate energy poverty while also addressing climate change. Some questions:
2/ Why block/impede North America oil pipelines/infrastructure while begging OPEC+ for more supply? Canada is our friend and a pretty great country. Can’t say the same for some other parts of the world.
3/ Why discourage development of Canada’s oil sands or US shale while encouraging Saudi, UAE, Iraq, and Russia (?!?!?) to boost its output? And Iran might get to return but Canada pipes need to be blocked? WTF?
Read 6 tweets
5 Jun
1 of 6/ Excellent essay by @JasonBordoff. In my words, killing Big Oil does not kill society’s desire to drive, fly, trade, conduct business, and aspire for middle class+ lifestyles.
2/ A few Qs: Do climate activists really want a world where OPEC+ gains market share? Why deter Canadian oil supply but not Iranian or Russian supply? Why not encourage governments to take serious steps to enforce ACTUAL mpg gains (hint: CAFE hasn’t worked)?
3/ Big Oil’s biggest issue is insufficient profitability over the past decade and it isn’t even that Big anymore at <3% of S&P. Medium Oil may be more accurate? Climate activism is currently aligned with traditional shareholders that want less CAPEX and more dividends. Thank you.
Read 6 tweets
3 Apr
1 of 8/ ROCE and the Path Back for Old Energy, Part 3

An Easter weekend continuation of my Saturday thread series on the potential for improved ROCE from Old Energy. I focus on what is possible for the well-run…not what we all already know is bad about the laggards.
2/ In the pre-super cycle decade of 1991-2000, 16 companies generated 10%+ ROCE, including 13 integrateds (BP, AN, ARC, CHV ,TX, XON, MOB, MRO, OXY, P, REP, STO, TOT), 2 E&Ps (EOG, SU), and 1 service (SLB). The Sweet 16 averaged a 17% ROCE. Legacy tickers used, in memorium.
3/ Of the pre-super cycle good ROCE-ers, 11 generated positive operating free cash flow (cash flow from ops less CAPEX). The 5 that didn’t — OXY, P, STO, EOG, and SU — were near break-even. Those 5 show that while positive FCF is helpful, it is not a prerequisite to good ROCE.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(