💥ACTION ALERT💥 To do this weekend!

The @nytimes is hosting Darren Woods, CEO of Exxon, at its DealBook Summit with @andrewrsorkin next week, a disgusting example of their shameful ignorance about the #ClimateCrisis at the Paper of Record.

THEY NEED TO HEAR FROM YOU!

*thread*
In the next tweets you'll find an email you can copy & paste (or adapt to your taste) & send to editorial@nytimes.com & andrew.sorkin@nytimes.com.

Let them know climate disinformation should have no place in the "legitimate" news media!

THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO! 💚

2/n
To the Editors:

I'm writing to express my dismay that The New York Times is hosting Darren Woods, the CEO of Exxon, at its DealBook Summit next week. It is 2021, and our planet has already heated by 1.2°C.

[...]

3/n
Mr. Woods was called before Congress last week to testify about his company's history of spreading climate disinformation. Congress has issued a subpoena to Mr. Woods in its investigation.

[...]

4/n
It is unconscionable (outrageous / disgusting / horrifying) that The New York Times is giving Mr. Woods a platform to continue to spread the lie that his company is fighting climate change.

[...]

5/n
Exxon is a member of the American Petroleum Institute, which spends billions on advertising and lobbying against climate policy,

[...]

6/n
and far from transforming itself into a clean-energy company, it is continuing to expand its oil and gas extraction business even though both the IPCC and IEA say that doing so will lead to catastrophic levels of global heating.

[...]

7/n
I ask The New York Times to join the reality-based community, which acknowledges the threat of fossil fuels to our children, and rescind its invitation to Mr. Woods.

Best,
YOUR NAME

8/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Genevieve Guenther

Dr. Genevieve Guenther Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoctorVive

28 Oct
The @OversightDems hearing into fossil-fuel disinformation, like the @nytimes @TBrandStudio ads that are exhibits in Congress' investigation, is getting underway!

Watch here👇

Let's gooo!

THREAD

oversight.house.gov/legislation/he…
Ok @RepMaloney is preaching the TRUTH in her opening remarks!

*The PR of the oil and gas companies is belied by their upstream investments and their lobbying to block climate policy.

HELL YES.

"We will not stop until we get to the truth." 💥

2/n
Rep. Comer is a fossil fuel ally who goes for the legitimacy of the hearings right out of the gate.

"Inflation"! "Gas Prices"! "Heating Bills"! "Immigrants"! "Afganistan"!

Nothing about the climate crisis here.

Too bad it's too early for a drinking game...

3/n
Read 103 tweets
27 Oct
I'm on my way to DC to watch the #SlipperySix fossil-fuel disinformation hearings with some fierce allies, and I plan to live-tweet the day.

Tonight I want to post some "pre-bunking" of a couple of talking points we're sure to see tomorrow.

THREAD
As exposed by @RBrulle @MichaelEMann @GeoffreySupran @BenFranta @NaomiOreskes and others, the cornerstone of the current fossil-fuel disinformation strategy is the rebranding of oil and gas companies as trustworthy partners in the clean-energy transition.

2/n
This rebranding has been achieved largely through false advertising & corporate sponsorship of academic programs, as well integration into scientific events & the COPs.

Hence the need for @cleancreatives and the @adsnotfit2print campaign.

adsnotfittoprint.com

3/n
Read 20 tweets
25 Oct
Taking some time to dive deeper into the CDR Primer written by a bunch of researchers and the PR firm @SpitfireSays, and I'm finding all these things that are...weird.

For instance, one chart claims that the @IPCC_CH doesn't mention CDR in SR 1.5, but in fact it does. It says👇 Image
The chart to which I referred in my previous tweet is in Chapter 1 of the CDR Primer, which is here:

cdrprimer.org/read/chapter-1
Here are some screenshots of the chart and the missing ✔️ in the IPCC column of the DAC line... ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
26 Aug
I am thrilled to announce that in partnership with @EvergreenAction @ClimatePower @350 @ClimateHawkVote @stopfundingheat @YEARSofLIVING & @fossilfreemedia, @EndClimtSilence is today launching a CAMPAIGN to tell @nytimes 💥STOP PROMOTING FOSSIL FUELS💥

✨THREAD✨
Since founding @EndClimtSilence in 2018, I have come to realize that the biggest problem facing climate journalism is the influence of fossil-fuel money on the executives running news outlets.

2/n
This influence emerges in many ways.

Broadcast network execs are, I believe, insinuating to their production and reporting teams that it's "political" or "biased" to cover the #ClimateCrisis precisely becuz they don't want to alienate their oil and gas advertisers.

3/n
Read 22 tweets
24 Aug
Hello climate and media Twitter! Curious about your take on these questions👇

1/n

Given that the #ClimateCrisis is accelerating and people are already dying (from heat, flood, disease, etc), fossil fuel ads in the news media are...
2/n

When a news outlet with an excellent climate desk not only runs but writes ads for oil and gas companies, they do what to the credibility of their journalism:
3/n

Given that the world must stop the general use of fossil fuels as soon as possible in order to halt global heating, legitimate news outlets encouraging readers to consume more fossil fuels by running ads for them is:
Read 5 tweets
9 Aug
I am deeply frustrated that the @IPCC_CH is calling for "reductions" in CO2 emissions rather than what is required: the virtual elimination of CO2 emissions in the next decades.

I mean, virtual elimination of emissions is what "reaching net-zero CO2 emissions" means!

1/2
"Reductions" is a weak word that suggests only action on the margins, like losing enough weight to tighten your belt by one hole, or something.

ACTION ON THE MARGINS IS NOT WHAT IS REQUIRED

1.5/2
What political struggle was lost to give us the mixed message that we need to both "reduce" emissions and "reach net zero emissions"?

I feel like I'm in one of those nightmares where you scream at the top of your lungs, but don't make even the smallest sound.

2/2
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(