I'm on my way to DC to watch the #SlipperySix fossil-fuel disinformation hearings with some fierce allies, and I plan to live-tweet the day.

Tonight I want to post some "pre-bunking" of a couple of talking points we're sure to see tomorrow.

THREAD
As exposed by @RBrulle @MichaelEMann @GeoffreySupran @BenFranta @NaomiOreskes and others, the cornerstone of the current fossil-fuel disinformation strategy is the rebranding of oil and gas companies as trustworthy partners in the clean-energy transition.

2/n
This rebranding has been achieved largely through false advertising & corporate sponsorship of academic programs, as well integration into scientific events & the COPs.

Hence the need for @cleancreatives and the @adsnotfit2print campaign.

adsnotfittoprint.com

3/n
This rebranding enables a coordinated slight-of-hand, whereby the oil and gas companies represent themselves as committed to fighting #climatechange, while their trade groups lobby Congress and run social-media ads against climate policy.

4/n
For example, a @nytclimate investigation by @HirokoTabuchi showed that this summer @APIenergy spent $500,000 in six weeks on Facebook ads attacking Biden's climate bill.

The ads targeted individual members of Congress & were viewed at least 21 m times.

nytimes.com/2021/09/30/cli…
The fossil-fuel execs testifying before the @OversightDems will claim that they've committed to net zero emissions, and they will imply that they lead the research program into clean energy technologies.

None of these messages are true.

6/n
The @IEA reports that 2020 clean energy investment by oil & gas cos accounted for only around 1% of the industry's total capital expenditure.

This means that they spend less on clean energy than they do on extracting new pockets of oil and gas.

7/n

iea.org/reports/world-…
According to the IEA, upstream oil and gas investment actually rose 6% in 2019 and is expected to rise by about 10% this year. (2020 was weird.)

In other words, instead of finding ways to replace fossil fuels, oil & gas companies are finding ways to extract more of them.

8/n
Yet the science shows, and the @IEA agrees, that in order to halt heating at 1.5°, fossil fuel companies cannot extract any new pockets of oil or gas.

Yet that is exactly what they are doing.

iea.org/reports/net-ze…

9/n
For more details, see these panels from the 2021 Report of @TheLancet, "Countdown on Health and Climate Change: Code Red for a Healthy Future."

11/n
So, to recap: these numbers demonstrate that oil and gas company pledges to reach net zero emissions are disinformation.

These pledges are false advertising: statements that misrepresent their business and their contribution to the accelerating climate crisis.

12/n
And the amount of 💸 that the oil & gas trade groups spend on lobbying & advertising *against* climate policy demonstrate that the industry does not support the goals of the #ParisAgreement, but fully operates to take us to 3°C of warming by 2100 and more beyond.

13/n
And, to be clear: the last time Earth was 3°C warmer—3 m years ago, before humans even existed—camels & alligators lived in the Arctic. The coastline of what would become the eastern US ended about 100 miles into what is now NC. And much of the planet was bare savannah.

14/n
If we allow our planet to heat up 3°C by 2100, its current configuration will break down and be rearranged into something much closer to that Pliocene system.

15/n
But this breakdown & reconstitution won't happen in an orderly transformation over tens of thousands of years; it will happen in a geological instant, destabilizing the conditions of our current civilizations and potentially killing billions.

16/n

Pace the @IPCC_CH: if the world heats up 3°C by 2100, changes in the hydrological cycle will make agriculture "unviable" in the equatorial region, most of Africa, parts of Eastern Europe, most of South Asia, the entire Mediterranean, as well as in the Great Planes & California.
That is a lot of territory suddenly struggling to grow food.

18/n
All of which is to say that the oil and gas executives who are testifying tomorrow are lying to sustain a business that will lead unimaginable and irreversible death and destruction.

19/n
Let's do everything we can to make these Hearings a real step towards removing them from the pinnacle of global power.

/fin

#SlipperySix #EndClimateSilence

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Genevieve Guenther

Dr. Genevieve Guenther Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoctorVive

28 Oct
The @OversightDems hearing into fossil-fuel disinformation, like the @nytimes @TBrandStudio ads that are exhibits in Congress' investigation, is getting underway!

Watch here👇

Let's gooo!

THREAD

oversight.house.gov/legislation/he…
Ok @RepMaloney is preaching the TRUTH in her opening remarks!

*The PR of the oil and gas companies is belied by their upstream investments and their lobbying to block climate policy.

HELL YES.

"We will not stop until we get to the truth." 💥

2/n
Rep. Comer is a fossil fuel ally who goes for the legitimacy of the hearings right out of the gate.

"Inflation"! "Gas Prices"! "Heating Bills"! "Immigrants"! "Afganistan"!

Nothing about the climate crisis here.

Too bad it's too early for a drinking game...

3/n
Read 102 tweets
25 Oct
Taking some time to dive deeper into the CDR Primer written by a bunch of researchers and the PR firm @SpitfireSays, and I'm finding all these things that are...weird.

For instance, one chart claims that the @IPCC_CH doesn't mention CDR in SR 1.5, but in fact it does. It says👇 Image
The chart to which I referred in my previous tweet is in Chapter 1 of the CDR Primer, which is here:

cdrprimer.org/read/chapter-1
Here are some screenshots of the chart and the missing ✔️ in the IPCC column of the DAC line... ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
26 Aug
I am thrilled to announce that in partnership with @EvergreenAction @ClimatePower @350 @ClimateHawkVote @stopfundingheat @YEARSofLIVING & @fossilfreemedia, @EndClimtSilence is today launching a CAMPAIGN to tell @nytimes 💥STOP PROMOTING FOSSIL FUELS💥

✨THREAD✨
Since founding @EndClimtSilence in 2018, I have come to realize that the biggest problem facing climate journalism is the influence of fossil-fuel money on the executives running news outlets.

2/n
This influence emerges in many ways.

Broadcast network execs are, I believe, insinuating to their production and reporting teams that it's "political" or "biased" to cover the #ClimateCrisis precisely becuz they don't want to alienate their oil and gas advertisers.

3/n
Read 22 tweets
24 Aug
Hello climate and media Twitter! Curious about your take on these questions👇

1/n

Given that the #ClimateCrisis is accelerating and people are already dying (from heat, flood, disease, etc), fossil fuel ads in the news media are...
2/n

When a news outlet with an excellent climate desk not only runs but writes ads for oil and gas companies, they do what to the credibility of their journalism:
3/n

Given that the world must stop the general use of fossil fuels as soon as possible in order to halt global heating, legitimate news outlets encouraging readers to consume more fossil fuels by running ads for them is:
Read 5 tweets
9 Aug
I am deeply frustrated that the @IPCC_CH is calling for "reductions" in CO2 emissions rather than what is required: the virtual elimination of CO2 emissions in the next decades.

I mean, virtual elimination of emissions is what "reaching net-zero CO2 emissions" means!

1/2
"Reductions" is a weak word that suggests only action on the margins, like losing enough weight to tighten your belt by one hole, or something.

ACTION ON THE MARGINS IS NOT WHAT IS REQUIRED

1.5/2
What political struggle was lost to give us the mixed message that we need to both "reduce" emissions and "reach net zero emissions"?

I feel like I'm in one of those nightmares where you scream at the top of your lungs, but don't make even the smallest sound.

2/2
Read 5 tweets
9 Aug
This week, and maybe next week, elected officials and the news media will be paying more attention to the #ClimateCrisis than they usually do.

Let's make this time count!

1/n
Use this tool to call your Senators and tell them you want them to pass transformative climate policy in order to win your vote. It's easy and very satisfying! And it will help.

call4climate.com/more

2/n
Here is contact information for the prime-time network news programs. Reach out to them and tell them you want more climate coverage! Make some noise!

static1.squarespace.com/static/5b71db1…

3/n
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(