The deeply ironic thing here is that the Supreme Court decision which asserted the people have a Constitutional right to privacy with specific regards to the choice to make personal medical decisions free of state interference would be... Roe v. Wade
https://twitter.com/BordelloFiasco/status/1457086698559610883
"States restricting your private right to make a personal medical choice? Oh you better *believe* that's unconstitutional. *The* state *stripping* your private right to make a personal medical choice? Oh you better BELIEVE that's constitutional!"
Like I get all the hypocrisy arguments, this is just about raw power etc, but this is just too funny. These people are a joke, they have no moral authority, any time they point to the Constitution and its law is only made in the attempt to undermine it
It's also useful in this case to look at the mechanism
The vaccine mandates aren't being applied to every individual, which the Supreme Court would be far more likely to protect, but are being laundered through enforcement of *companies*, who then exert the state's will
The vaccine mandates aren't being applied to every individual, which the Supreme Court would be far more likely to protect, but are being laundered through enforcement of *companies*, who then exert the state's will
The outcome is all but exactly the same. Individuals are stripped of choice and rights one way or the other
And, ironically, the only ones *immune* from their rights being stripped away by mandates are those who already possess higher degrees of freedom: the self-employed
And, ironically, the only ones *immune* from their rights being stripped away by mandates are those who already possess higher degrees of freedom: the self-employed
So those who are already most "freedom-vulnerable," to use the parlance of the times, continue to be thrust deeper into a "freedom poverty-desert" by this mandate
Any court interested in individual freedom—the very purpose of the Constitution—should be obsessed with this matter
Any court interested in individual freedom—the very purpose of the Constitution—should be obsessed with this matter
Not to mention the companies' own property rights, which should allow them to mandate vaccines or not in accordance with their own beliefs
Which should *then* be countermanded by the employees' individual freedom to make personal, private medical choices
Which should *then* be countermanded by the employees' individual freedom to make personal, private medical choices
Whatever angle you look at it, from a Constitutional standpoint—again, especially the Sacred Roe, which positively affirmed specific private medical freedoms—a vaccine mandate is not only unconstitutional, it's like double unconstitutional lol
One extremely farcical thing going on here is the left trying to skinsuit the old institutions of patriotism as evidence that it is the new patriotism: the military, the FBI, etc, "We're the REAL America"
As they work to dissolve all national differences and America itself
As they work to dissolve all national differences and America itself
No one buys it. It's a joke on its face, like utterly laughable
If that is true, then, you can also work backwards to see how they have also skinsuited the patriotic Constitution itself: if the new rules are being used to subvert the obvious original intention...
If that is true, then, you can also work backwards to see how they have also skinsuited the patriotic Constitution itself: if the new rules are being used to subvert the obvious original intention...
Then in what sense is this "Second Constitution" American?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
