After some discussion with him, I think the enjoyment of Dune is directly proportional to whether you think Fellowship was the best or the least of the LOTR trilogy
I go Fellowship. Nemets goes Return of the King. There's a clear aesthetic judgment at play here
ROTK is about the Actions of the Decisive Moment, aka the ultimate climax, what this says about its actors and their values and how they acquit themselves, along with the resulting catharsis that is the consequence of all the things that has led up to this moment
When Theoden shows up to the deciding battle of ROTK, and gives his final speech, this is the most powerful singular moment of the trilogy. You can imagine yourself being goaded into battle by his words. That's incredible cinema and storytelling, total buy-in
A moment that deep is hard, perhaps impossible, to achieve in Fellowship, when the highest-stakes battle is Boromir overcoming his weakness to protect the hobbits he's always had some contempt for, as he's just become lordly enough to recognize their quality
A powerful moment in its own right. Essentially the moral climax of many other very good movies, like A Quiet Place
But only the beginning of the climactic developments of LOTR. Another great argument for ROTK, after its figures have *all* grown into the heights of their powers
Still, I have always loved Fellowship most. Specifically *because* that is where we see the heroes before they're real heroes, and as they're only just starting to take on the mantle
And I think the major reason I love Fellowship most is because that's when the Dream begins
Not just for the characters, but for the vivid, complete, and engrossing presentation of the setting. Fellowship and Dune open up worlds that feel fully realized, that don't feel like ours, that you can get lost in. I very rarely feel this from a movie
You can only experience that original Sense of Wonder, of being initiated into a new world, a single time. To me, any movie (or book etc) that can do that isn't "boring," it's the opposite, a work of magic
The later works can fulfill the initial promise given to you, but it feels to me more like a foregone conclusion *of* that promise (unless the author loses the plot, his original promise, like Game of Thrones for instance)
But that initial hit is unrivaled
The Matrix made me believe (oops lol). Fellowship made me believe (and fully rewarded its promise). Dune made me believe. I can only hope the second half pays off what it has promised
But it is, just simply, the rare work that makes me *believe*. That's my favorite thing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The deeply ironic thing here is that the Supreme Court decision which asserted the people have a Constitutional right to privacy with specific regards to the choice to make personal medical decisions free of state interference would be... Roe v. Wade
"States restricting your private right to make a personal medical choice? Oh you better *believe* that's unconstitutional. *The* state *stripping* your private right to make a personal medical choice? Oh you better BELIEVE that's constitutional!"
Like I get all the hypocrisy arguments, this is just about raw power etc, but this is just too funny. These people are a joke, they have no moral authority, any time they point to the Constitution and its law is only made in the attempt to undermine it
Dang I liked Dune. I had the feeling Villeneuve was the guy to pull off how big and foreign the universe is but he created one of the most vivid film-worlds I've ever seen
I liked Bladerunner 2049 a fair bit but didn't *love* it. But something about how he presented that world made me think that if anyone could handle Dune it was him
I read several reviews today to take in the consensus and even the most snark- and irony-poisoned critics who wanted to dislike it could only take a few light swings at it
Because the mood somehow *is* just as cyclopean as its visuals. Far outside what they're used to
Frankly, hiring a few NEETs to maintain a Real History of Current Year would be a better use of money than nearly any other project right now
Both to preserve the true counter-narrative, + simply to maintain the memory of all these events that are so easy to forget in the deluge
Based
Remember that one of the cores of this thing is to exist as a counter-propaganda movement. The 1/6 "insurrection" was fake news from the start, on a level unrivaled outside of the Russian Collusion Hoax
Trust can't be restored within the framework of the regime. It can't allow itself to be reformed, because pulling up any plank of the system undermines nearly every other part of it as well. Reform, for it, is collapse
So its survival requires enforcing complete submission to it
Complete submission is by no means guaranteed, they actually have very little will to use force (so far), and use of force tends to be a failure-mode within democracy, hence "nudges," "policies," and anarcho-tyranny, all forms of hand-washing away responsibility
But as for restoring trust, that simply can't happen within this framework. Coercion is their only remaining option. Engineering and enforcing the fake appearance of trust, to match the rest of the fake and gay regime
lmao. This is why @Tinkzorg is one of my most favorite recent follows
It's no coincidence that Jurassic Park as explained here "got it," because Michael Crichton "got it," that's how Crichton coined the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect, the original "fake news"
One of the simplest ways of understanding American politics, and by extension all Western politics, is that you have a once-stable political system (post-WW2 order) increasingly pushed toward a chaotic instability
Hence Brexit, Trump, Italy, Hungary, even Bolsonaro, etc
The ruling order—described in this piece as the guy automating the electric fences to keep the dinosaurs out—is increasingly unable to sustain those once-electric fences
It won't allow a "Trump" etc to repair them, either. That's why I think we're inevitably headed towards chaos
This is the Big Fat Skeleton Key to understanding nearly everything around us. This culture's basic ideological framework is that everything that exists is a result of nurture and environment (including "socio-economic status")
This is shocking and upsetting in many ways, because a culture that promises everything is the result of nurture means that you can always wildly improve your lot in life—and especially your children's—by adhering to the scientifically-approved nurture, environment, and policies
But the fact is we're all limited, in many ways, and to an immense variance between us all, from the moment we are conceived
Yet I find this immensely liberating, in the *real* sense of the word. For it relieves everyone of being in constant competition with everyone, for life