QUESTION TO LABOUR: when we are engaged in a full trade war with the EU, the WA has been partly suspended,the Brexit deal has been terminated by the EU (as we hear will happen) where does this leave the Brexit strategy of @Keir_Starmer ? 🧵1/9
Sitting on the fence is virtually impossible.This killed Labour at the last GE. Improving a trade agreement which is terminated is a non-proposition. So what will be the strategy? Labour will be 100% trapped in another Brexit election in a hellish loop.
Support the government stance & lose your pro-EU voters to @LibDems & @TheGreenParty. Support reinstating the NIP & the TCA: what effect in those Red Wall seats Labour needs which will be fired up on fake patriotism?
It does open an opportunity for a pre-election Alliance between Greens, Libdems, PC (& SNP?) being far more significant & damaging for Labour if they put a clear waterline between them & Labour with a proposal for a new relationship with the EU (SM &CU), firing up pro-EU voters.
"Tory Brexit has failed/isn't working" "A new Brexit is possible" etc. & campaign energetically up & down the country.The pressure on @Keir_Starmer will be enormous. The middle ground is a very unattractive option: he will make everyone unhappy.
The best option for Labour is likely to be to take the lead:
- start immediate discussions with LD & Greens
- define & embrace a new EU relationship
- justify a pact on seats by the gravity of no deal, National Unity Government etc
- rubbish the Tories as incompetent warmongers
- set out a good domestic programme. Point out the Tories EU wars are an unwelcome distraction Labour didn't chose. Brexit needs to get "done" once & for all in a way which doesn't damage the country, so that the government of the day
can concentrate on domestic priorities rather than endless EU fights.

This is an existential moment for Labour: if it choses the wrong strategy, it will get eviscerated. Chosing the path above involves huge risks but there is no safe option. Have a go at it, all guns blazing!
Put the seat belts on: it will be a very bumpy road. At the end of it, the whole political landscape of the UK may be recomposed for good or worse. END/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mafevema #CommonGround

Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mafevema

7 Nov
Withering editorial in @TheEconomist widely read internationally. Johnson is trashing the reputation of the UK & not just with the Paterson's affair.
"Having strode victorious into Downing Street as one of the architects of Brexit, the PM behaves as if laws are for other people."
"The prime minister is seeking to undermine Britain’s precarious system of checks and balances. When officials responsible for holding ministers to account have tried to do their job, they are made to suffer. "
"The government is neutering independent bodies supposed to hold it to account. It wants to put the Electoral Commission, a watchdog, under the thumb of a Conservative-dominated committee of mps, and to strip it of the power to initiate criminal prosecutions."
Read 7 tweets
2 Nov
👇On the misleading use of Labour rulebook as an alibi against collaboration with other parties.
In summary…

"There is no constitutional or procedural reason why the Labour Party cannot form a Progressive Alliance with the other Centre-Left parties."
getprdone.org.uk/the-progressiv…
"The reason why Labour has only ever cooperated fleetingly, in a given seat for a single election, and never cooperated strategically, has not been for any constitutional or organisational reason but simply because the Labour Party did not wish to do so."
"Thankfully, the sobering reality of four successive election defeats and the near-certainty of a fifth defeat to follow in 2024 (or earlier) has started to move more and more Labour supporters to favour cross-party cooperation."
Read 6 tweets
16 Oct
1. At best the polls in the next GE will show the possibility of a hung Parliament
2. Without a plan & a common structured strategy, the Opposition parties will be destroyed by accusations of "coalition of chaos" & the Tories will win. For the public "hung Parliament"= chaos.
3.Unless the parties agree something like 👇 ( or a "lite" form of this) which would also provide an optimistic narrative of renewal and which must of course include PR, we are doomed.
An Alliance can take many forms. What I outlined in the tweet you commented on is a "lite Alliance" version. I should have added:
5. Coordinate attacks on Tories
Read 12 tweets
15 Oct
Labour is not fit for purpose. It is anti-democratic & obsessed only with remaining the first Opposition party.
Why? Well in part because of ££££
FPTP helps Labour to get rich.

Every seat lost costs Labour £18,407
Every 200 votes lost cost £36.76
PR would be disastrous.
A 🧵
Labour, like other opposition parties receive what is called the Short money, i.e. public money :
1. General funding for Opposition Parties: the amount payable is £18,407.21 for every seat won at the last GE (£3.6M) + £36.76 for every 200 votes won.
The last GE cost Labour £1.2M
In contrast the @LibDems receive £220,000 for their 12 seats @the Greens, with one seat only must secure at least 150,000 votes & receive a pitiful amount. Both parties increased their vote share but not their seats - in fact the LD lost one (now back at 12 due to Chesham)
Read 11 tweets
15 Oct
Excellent from @Neal_Compass.
Trying to decipher why Labour rejects PR & #ProgressiveAlliance& whether it can change (answer: very unlikely)
prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/labou…
The scale of the electoral mountain Labour must climb is eye-watering. It would need the same sort of historic swing that achieved a landslide in 1945 or 1997 simply to eke out a bare majority of one (which would today require a gain of 124 seats).
With no sign of the SNP hold on Scotland weakening and the possibility of punishing boundary changes kicking in, outright victory would surely take an intellectual and organisational effort of a sort of which there is no sign around the Leadership.
Read 12 tweets
15 Oct
It may turn out that the "long bad dream" of our non-EU membership could be about to start.
The bad dream David Frost did not dare mentioning in his speech of 4th October on.ft.com/3DCq9Mo via @FT
France, Germany, the Netherlands - traditionally a close ally of the UK- supported by Spain & Italy pressing the Commission to prepare a plan for retaliatory sanctions.
Such as "curbing UK access to the bloc’s energy supplies, imposing tariffs on British exports, or in extreme circumstances terminating the trade agreement between the two sides."
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(