1. The world of innovation is spiky and appears to be getting spikier, according the later NBER working paper by Bill Kerr and Brad Chattergoon at Harvard Business School: nber.org/papers/w29456?…
2. The study tracks patents for all patents, and for software and non-software patents from January 1976-December 2020. Here are some of the key findings ...
3. "U.S. patenting has become much more spatially concentrated around tech clusters like SanFrancisco and Boston compared to the 1970s, making these places more productive for researchers ... important for business organization, and central to high-tech startups."
4.The period saw 6 tech hubs - San Francisco,
Boston, Seattle, San Diego, Denver, and Austin -consolidate and massively increase their share of patents.
5. "The rise of the six tech centers is very stark ... The six tech centers account for 11.3% of patents from 1975-1979, but surge to 34.2% for 2015- 2019. San Francisco’s growth is from 4.6% to 18.4%" Yowza ...
6." The five largest population centers show the
largest drop, from 32.2% to 18.6%. By contrast, the aggregate decline for the other 270 cities,
from 45.5% to 41.0%, is much less. Non-urban areas also decline from 11.0% to 6.1%."
7. "This reallocation is remarkable and has not been documented in prior work. Indeed, because the
reallocation is among big cities, this movement of well more than 10% of patents is almost completely orthogonal to the standard elasticity measured across the full city size."
8. The 6 "tech centers account for 45.4% of software patents after 2015, more than double their starting
share of 20.2%. San Francisco again features prominently with 25.8% of software patents filed
after 2015. This reallocation pulled from all regions."
9."tech clusters are also important for non-software patents, growing from 11.0% to 23.1% across the period. San Francisco is 11.1%. However, the share for the 270 MSAs grows slightly from 45.5% to 48.1%. ..."
10. "The shift is instead from the five largest cities in 1980, which fall from 32.3% to 20.0%."
11. They conclude that: "The four MSAs that attracted the biggest absolute change in patent counts from
1975 to 2020 are four of our tech clusters (in order): San Francisco, Seattle, Boston, and San Diego ..."
12. "The next three cities in terms of the biggest absolute change in patent counts over the period are Los Angeles, New York City, and Detroit, three of our five large 1980 population centers."
13."the major Rust Belt cities (such as Buffalo, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh) also lose a substantial share of patenting since the 1970s."
14. I could go on but you get the picture. Patents are very, very spiky. It is doubtful any post-COVID shifts can fully reverse these trends.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Florida

Richard Florida Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Richard_Florida

27 Oct
1. Some quick comments to contextualize this piece on the evolution of urban downtowns or central business districts.
2. This is yet another example of COVID-19 as accelerator (not disruptor).
3. The CBD was evolving in this direction before the pandemic.
Read 11 tweets
17 Sep
1. Since you inquired. Some key passages. Bodes better for post-pandemic cities ...
2. "Traditional theories of cities emphasize production decisions and the costs of workers commuting between their workplace and residence."
3. "However, much of the travel that occurs within urban areas is related not to commuting but rather to the consumption of nontraded services, such as trips to restaurants, coffee shops and bars, shopping centers,
cultural venues, and other services."
Read 10 tweets
12 Sep
1. A quick thread on the new book Survival of the City by Ed Glaeser & David Cutler. Just finished it this afternoon. It's terrific. A must, must read. There is a lot to the book, so I'll focus on what it has to say for cities and urbanization.
2. First off, it's an extremely well-crafted book - a GREAT READ.
3. For me the highlight of the book are the chapters which trace the history of pandemics & plagues & their impacts on cities and urbanization. It's clear Glaeser loves this material and that he has a penchant for economic history and it shines as a high point of the book.
Read 16 tweets
4 Aug
1. Interested in the future of downtowns & central business districts. Let's take a little time machine back to 1958 and see what Jane Jacobs had to say on the subject in her seminal essay, "Downtown Is for People."
innovationecosystem.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/6…
2. "We are accustomed to thinking of downtowns as divided into functional districts – financial, shopping, theatre – and so they are, but only to a degree."
3. "As soon as an area gets too exclusively devoted to one
type of activity and its direct convenience services,
it gets into trouble; it loses its appeal to the users
of downtown and it is in danger of becoming a
has-been."
Read 10 tweets
2 Aug
1. Quick thread of the main ideas in my @USATODAY oped with @ArthurCaplan on how to treat the unvaccinated in light of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.
usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
2. Our basic position: "People are free to make all the bad choices they want when it comes to themselves, but not when they put others in danger and incur costs that we all must pay. "
3. Especially with the uber-contagious Delta variant, the unvaccinated pose direct risks to the health and well-being of the immunocompromised, the frail and the elderly, and especially young kids.
Read 12 tweets
26 Jul
1. A quick summary of the key findings of my just released paper with @CharlottadcM on the Geography of COVID-19 in Sweden: link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s…
2. Our paper examines the role of 2 kinds of factors in the geography of COVID-19 in Sweden.
3. Place-based factors like density, socio-economic disparity, age levels, versus diffusion factors like proximity to harder hit areas which would be associated with the spread of COVID.
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(