For those of you who are invested in Kadena ($KDA), thinking about investing into $KDA or have heard about it. Here are some key points to look into before you go invest (- WARNING - BE - CAREFUL -)
Y'all might have seen $KDA chart which was quite impressive to say the least.
2/
Kadena $KDA aims to kill both #Bitcoin and #Ethereum in one shot. It also promises infinite scalability, upgradeable smart contracts which sound too good to be true.
If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
3/
Kadena $KDA has some lesser known investors which is a concern🤔
4/
Kadena $KDA supports native oracles and decentralized bridges, unparalleled POW security, multi-chain currency and its built with Haskell like Cardano.
Sounds like it promises to kill 99.9% of all projects out there. Sounds too good to be true 🤔
5/
Kadena $KDA ranked against competing blockchains is painted nothing short of impressive. Sounds too good to be true, it probably is 🤔
6/
Kadena $KDA has red flags like missing white papers which is a HUGE RED FLAG 🚩
7/
Kadena $KDA public GitHub seems to have 3 developers which sounds shady scary at best for all the problems this project promises to solve 🤔
8/
Kadena $KDA scales like a DAG with braiding multiple chains for theoretically unlimited TPS, which sounds fancy and too good to be true. Another red flag IMHO.
9/
Kadena $KDA promises so minute transaction fees, it's almost impossible for miners to secure this network. If miners abandon this project, its pretty much dead 🤔
10/
Kadena $KDA token allocations currently are 57.4% allocated to insiders which is quite alarming 🤔
11/
Overall this project promises everything in the world. It sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
The influence of corporate money in politics is a pervasive force that often shapes government inaction on issues like genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Companies like Bayer and Monsanto, with their deep pockets and extensive lobbying networks, have the resources to sway policymakers in their favor. They contribute millions to political campaigns, ensuring that elected officials remain sympathetic to their interests. This financial leverage creates a system where legislation or regulation that might harm these corporations’ bottom lines—such as banning or heavily restricting GMOs—is quietly sidelined. The revolving door between government agencies and corporate boardrooms only deepens this entanglement, as former industry executives often take regulatory roles, bringing their biases with them.
Beyond direct political influence, these corporations have mastered the art of shaping public perception through partnerships with universities and media outlets. By funding research at academic institutions, they can produce studies that downplay or dismiss health concerns related to GMOs, lending a veneer of scientific legitimacy to their products. These studies are then amplified by media campaigns, often subtly sponsored or influenced by the same corporations, to reassure the public that GMOs are safe and necessary for feeding a growing population. Dissenting voices—independent researchers or whistleblowers raising red flags about potential health risks—are drowned out or discredited, leaving regulators with a convenient excuse: the “science” isn’t conclusive enough to justify action.
Finally, the government’s inertia can be attributed to a broader economic calculus that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term public health. GMOs are deeply embedded in the agricultural industry, which contributes significantly to GDP and employs millions. Disrupting this system by cracking down on GMO foods would ripple through the economy, threatening jobs, trade relationships, and corporate profits—consequences no administration wants to face. Politicians, wary of being labeled as anti-business or anti-progress, opt for the path of least resistance, allowing these food giants to operate with minimal oversight. Meanwhile, any evidence of harm to human health is buried under bureaucratic delays or dismissed as anecdotal, preserving the status quo where profit trumps precaution.
In a society where ninety-nine are weak,
Catering to one percent, the woke mind virus we seek.
We bend, we twist, in endless contortions,
For those whose views demand our constant attention.
Enough is enough, we must stand and say,
No more to the norms that lead us astray.
We're lost in a maze of virtue so fake,
Where common sense and reason are hard to make.
Break the shackles of this modern-day plight,
Where speaking freely invites social fight.
We've tiptoed around, afraid to offend,
But now is the time to make our voices blend.
Let's reclaim the ground where logic once stood,
Where truth wasn't buried under virtue's wood.
We'll rise from the shadows, no longer confined,
To a world where the sane are not redefined.
Enough with the madness, the guilt, and the shame,
We'll break these chains in freedom's name.
For unity, not division, we'll strive,
In a society where all can truly thrive.
The acronym "DOGE" "Democrats Officially Getting Exposed." It is used to imply that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under the administration of President Donald Trump, is revealing or exposing alleged inefficiencies, fraud, and corruption supposedly linked to Democratic policies or government operations they've been in charge of or supported.
🚩Fraudulent Activities Uncovered by DOGE:
1. Improper Payments at the Treasury Department:
- DOGE has claimed that payment approval officers at the Treasury Department were instructed to approve payments indiscriminately, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups.
2. USAID Operations:
- DOGE has been involved in the shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), asserting that it is rife with fraud and waste. Specific claims include the agency funding projects like a DEI musical in Ireland and transgender opera in Colombia.
3. Access to Sensitive Government Systems:
- There are reports of DOGE gaining access to sensitive data, including Treasury payment systems, which could involve personal financial information of citizens.
4. Alleged Waste in Federal Spending:
- DOGE has announced savings, such as canceling over $1 billion in federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) contracts, suggesting these were wasteful or fraudulent expenditures.
5. General Claims of Fraud and Abuse:
- Broad assertions have been made by DOGE about uncovering "massive fraud, abuse, money laundering, and corruption" within government operations, though specifics beyond the above examples are less detailed in public reports.