Thread by @WinstonWakesUp

THREAD: My Boss Has No Balls

I've been challenging the Executive of my NHS Trust for over a year with regular questions submitted to a live Q&A, which is archived publicly on YouTube
The Chief Exec has dodged some key questions, but has given revealing answers to others... 1/

When asked if he'd challenged the govts arbitrary decision to give the 2nd dose 12 weeks following the 1st, rather than 3 weeks (which trial safety & efficacy data was predicated on) he said he had, very strongly, but was told by govt "that's just how it's going to be" 2/

When asked if he agreed with a jab mandate, he said he did not, and that it was "right" that people should have a choice. But that he would implement the mandate when the govt ordered him to. #JustDoingMyJob
#NoJabNoJob 3/

When asked for his opinion on the #CormanDrostenReview and it's case for explaining how the #PCR test isn't fit for purpose, he commented on unrelated "conspiracy theories" that the question didn't even mention. He also wrongly played down the significance of high cycle rates. 4/

They dodged a Q about staff 'positives' comparing jabbed & unjabbed. Until the next month, the day after I received a reply to an FOI askin the same Q, at which point they read out the stats, having been legally obliged to

63 jabbed, 17 unjabbed. I wonder why they hesitated. 5/

When asked about interplay of govt & Trust management, the Chief Exec said "we normally have guidance but anythin Covid related, it's mandates" the Trust is being ordered to do it, w/ zero evidence or rationale given. Like gangsters expecting unquestioning compliance. 6/

Despite attempting to play down the serious problems with PCR testing, as outlined here - cormandrostenreview.com/report/
The Chief Exec admitted that he had no idea what cycle rate the tests being processed for the Trust were being run at. He said the cycle rate was "black boxed". 7/

I have submitted probing questions about specific aspects of the science as it has come to light..about the dangers & inefficacy of the jabs. They tend to ignore those Qs & shrug it off that the Trust doesn't do it's own research. What about Continued Professional Development? 8/

I'll continue to submit questions & attempt to elicit honest answers. If you have any suggestions for things to ask, please comment them on this thread. The more specific the better. At the very least I want to make it a little bit more difficult for them to sleep at night. 9/