@AswathDamodaran Professor Damodaran, I'd like to thank you for your honesty, for admitting that you were wrong about Tesla & for your self-reflection. Not a common trait among Tesla bears. I'm a long-time fan of your "Musings on Markets" blog - while disagreeing with your Tesla thesis. 🙃
1/
Here's a list of key points where I think you are mistaken in your Tesla valuation:
▪️Why cap (net) margins at 16%? The fact that Tesla already has 30.5% gross margins despite 70% YoY hyper-growth expenses is a strong signal that operational efficiency hasn't peaked yet.
▪️With a +70% YoY growth rate Tesla has countless operational inefficiencies, both incidental and unavoidable ones: expansion of facilities & hiring has to lead actual sales by several quarters, and much of it isn't capex but increases cost of revenues, opex / SG&A.
▪️Even "old" capex from 2 years ago is temporarily reducing margins right now, because Tesla depreciates their investments on an accelerated schedule. Capex overhead of the $4b+ Model 3 factory has been much reduced with the ~$1b Shanghai factory.
▪️Much of the capex efficiency improvements have not rolled into Tesla margins yet - yet it now has higher margins than literally every other major auto company, many of whom have 10x-20x of Tesla's unit scale.
▪️But as Tesla increases its unit scale 20x, that will work in their favor as well:
▪️Plain efficiencies of scale in parts and materials purchases
▪️Wright's Law
▪️Say's Law
▪️Operational margins are a direct multiplier to valuation: a company with 30% net margins is worth twice as much as one with 15%, all other things equal. Capping Tesla net margins at 16% while increasing revenue to $400b needs more justification than historic parallels.
▪️Margins are also a function of market power & pricing power. Tesla recently demonstrated their quasi-monopoly status, when they didn't take a fleet purchase deal from Hertz, who has to buy 100,000 Teslas at retail prices. Unprecedented market power in the auto industry.
▪️Unprecedented high Tesla margins and quasi-monopoly market dominance aside - both of which are hefty valuation multipliers in pretty much any industry - there's other positives of Tesla which I believe your thesis missed:
▪️I quote below your reasoning for why you think Tesla margins will come under pressure.
▪️This argument omits Tesla's meanwhile oppressive manufacturing efficiency lead versus competitors - such the lead over one of the best legacy companies: Volkswagen.
▪️A recent quote from Volkswagen brand CEO Brandstätter highlights Tesla's lead in car manufacturing tech:
"Model 3 is built in 10 hours, more than 3 times as fast as a VW ID.3 in Zwickau. This puts Tesla in another dimension in terms of productivity and profitability"
▪️Tesla isn't just a "lucky" pioneer who benefits from first-mover status. Tesla is also an innovative high-tech disruptor who has leapfrogged legacy auto in their core strength: manufacturing.
▪️Similar sentiment shared by Ford CEO Farley as well:
But the list of Tesla upsides, reflected in Street valuation, continues:
▪️Tesla addresses not just the $2.3t market of new car sales, but the broader $5t+ auto market with high margin businesses such as dealerships, used car sales, service, parts, financing & insurance.
▪️If we just double your target market size from the $2.3t to the actual auto market targeted by Tesla to $4.6t - with all other things equal revenue doubles to $828b... and so does valuation.
▪️Tesla's integration of all these other auto businesses has to be recognized.
▪️We also cannot ignore the fact that Tesla has expanded the auto market in terms of revenues.
▪️Lending data confirms the "Tesla stretch", that consumers are willing to spend more on Teslas than any other car:
▪️Apple expanded the "phone market" from below $100b per year to above $500b.
▪️How much are Tesla's "iPhones on wheels" expanding the auto market? Time will tell, but early data suggests a substantial percentage. Higher willingness to spend results in higher margins too.
But I'm not even half through the list of Tesla valuation factors you missed:
▪️Tesla has guided cell production of 5,000 GWh/year by 2030. 50% of that for vehicles, 50% for stationary energy storage.
▪️Tesla's energy utility products are cell-starved, waiting list 1+ year.
▪️With Tesla's announcement last September that they have cell production technologies that lower expansion capex by several multiples and production costs by -70% Tesla is poised to lead the world's installation of 100+ TWh stationary storage required by renewables.
▪️Stationary energy storage is a huge future market, which will disrupt and replace current fossil fuel peaker plants & baseline power plants. Total current global energy market spending per year: ~$5 trillion. High margins.
▪️Much has been written about Tesla's autonomous car project, but your thesis only touches it tangentially.
▪️Autonomous vehicles are probably a trillion dollar market in itself - but it's hard to value & Tesla's share is uncertain, so I agree with you not even trying to.
▪️But autonomy looms large, and valuations are future cash flows probability- and rate- discounted to the present. Even if we rate Tesla's success in autonomy at only 10% - a trillion dollar income source increases stochastic valuation today.
▪️It's important that Tesla is a unicorn among autonomy startups: the only major player whose central thesis is that vehicle autonomy is a 𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙙 problem that forced Tesla to design two chips (client & server) to handle general purpose vision-only AI computing.
▪️The overwhelming majority of self-driving competitors to Tesla took the "easy but expensive" shortcut of LIDAR & radar sensors, which are both expensive & fragile to common weather features such as rain or snow, or don't detect pedestrians (most radar sensors).
▪️Tesla's approach to autonomy is "inexpensive sensors but powerful AI" is the only mass adaptable approach to vehicle autonomy.
▪️If Tesla is right & they succeed, it's another huge lead & dominance in another high margin, trillion dollar market.
▪️Side note: Tesla's AI chip efforts enable entry into the largest market on Earth, the ~$50 trillion dollars per year labor market...
▪️But it's fair & appropriate to not consider future revenue from armies of rented out Tesla Bots while it's still in the prototype stage.
TLDR: Tesla is basically a giant incubator of startups created by uber-nerd Elon Musk, many of which startups have their own trillion-dollar moonshots.
Tesla is undervalued as an auto company already & it is so much more than just an auto company.
Shameless: the infamous $4,500 "UAW bribe" in the "Build Back Better Act" (H.R. 5376) excludes employee-owned US car factories, such as Tesla, even if they form a union (!).
It defines "Domestic Assembly Qualifications" in a way that requires 50%+ non-shareholder employees...
@nealboudette@earcos@elonmusk For every robotaxi projection that turned out to be too optimistic (during a pandemic year...), there's a dozen improbable feats Musk already accomplished:
✅ landing rockets,
✅ a million Teslas,
✅ launching astronauts,
✅ Space Internet,
✅ fastest production car, etc.
Tesla's all-time record deliveries of 184.8k vehicles is extremely impressive, given the countless Q1 headwinds:
❌ Q1 seasonally weakest (winter) quarter for auto sales: a 10-20% headwind
❌ Tesla had no Model S/X production due to the Plaid refresh: ~15k units missing
❌ China: the quarter was 10 days shorter due to the Chinese New Year and the calendar quarter being 2 days shorter. That's 10 days of missing sales & production days.
❌ US: some buyers were possibly waiting for the new federal EV incentives
❌ Samsung Texas factory shutdown
3/
❌ Europe: many key markets are in partial or full Covid lock-downs, such as the Netherlands which was on a hard lock-down for the whole quarter.
❌ Tesla had a 2-day production shutdown at Fremont, due to parts shortages.
❌ Model 3 cannibalized by ramping Model Y
Tesla has yet to disclose details about their "Dojo" training chip, here's the CPU die layout of their inference chip.
The large integrated SRAM cells & the single-clock 96x96 matrix multiplicators allow Tesla HW3 boards to run large NNs at unmatched power efficiency.
3/
Power efficiency is the primary limit of consumer grade, mass-adopted autonomy (self-driving in every car): while current top of the line GPUs are able to perform inference computing at a performance comparable to Tesla's FSD chip, they do it while drawing ~10x more power.
Why the leak of record Tesla Q1 European deliveries is authentic IMO:
✅ figures internally consistent
✅ record EU Q1 ships
✅ awkward April 1 timing
✅ fake leak would avoid typos in business email
✅ fake leak would leak global numbers
✅ reliable source of @RandyVegetables
✅ "Tesla authentic" language & non-obvious internal details a fake one with typos wouldn't know to replicate
✅ Timing of April 1 and AM European time is correct for the final figures to be summarized, and a rushed congratulatory email by a clearly proud EMEA team lead.
3/
Individually these details are all circumstantial evidence, but in combination they give me high confidence that this leak is probably authentic.
Why many Tesla investors are frustrated over Tesla's Bitcoin experiment.
@elonmusk describing money as "avoiding the inconvenience of barter" is a rare case of him misunderstanding the first principles of something utterly important: the history & role of money.
I realize that I'll lose followers over this - but this had to be said.
It is a commonly told story to economics students all over the world: money and coinage was created to replace unwieldy barter. Instead of exchanging goods, people exchanged valuable gold coins.
3/
This is a convenient story that, just like the story Tesla cars being inconvenient & "dirty", is utterly false.
There's literally 𝒛𝒆𝒓𝒐 evidence in the rich archaeological record of humanity suggesting high functioning barter economies who simplified barter with coinage.