EXCLUSIVE: Teaser....
2/
3/
4/ Hmm, 12/2015 and 1/2016 why important?
5/
6/ Hmmm, think something didn't turn out as expected...
7/
8/
9/ Background reading: washingtonexaminer.com/news/identity-… I FOIAed Georgia Tech...you know, like what journalists are suppose to do. Key here appears that there were other legitimate contracts involving some of players too. I'm posting raw emails of interest for your researches as I dig
10/
11/ Ga Tech contract:
12/ Weird that the "from" line was entirely redacted here....Hmmm.
13/ LOL....but at least this guy is more reasonable than the press:
13/ LOL:
15/ And Republicans are the ones who are conspirator theorists.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

3 Nov
BREAKING: Racine County Sheriff's Office sends felony criminal referral for WEC commissioners to prosecutor's office.
2/ Here is your background reading. thefederalist.com/2021/11/01/wis…
Read 4 tweets
2 Nov
THREADETTE: If the government wanted to up the rates of COVID vaccination, they would do this:
1) Tell Americans that unfortunately the vaccinations do NOT protect against infection or being able to transmit COVID other than in X% (if that is accurate).
BUT 1/
2/ That people vaccinated are less likely to X, Y, Z, with transparent and accurate numbers.
3) That people with natural immunity are as protected if not more protected BUT not forever and provide best info.
4/ Explain that there are side effects and especially for some groups (women w/ J&J, teens-ish w/ others), and give accurate details of that AND risk they face versus risk of COVID.
5/ Note PCP should help individuals & parents make decision for those in categories at X/Y age.
Read 8 tweets
29 Oct
@bradheath And Brad, this is why you're my favorite left-leaning reporter: because you at least try to be unbiased. Well, that and that you are never rude (and followers don't be rude to Brad!) and actually engage on the merits. I'll never convince you, but that's okay. 1/
@bradheath 2/ For instance, this exchange: I'm coming at it from the right and you from the left--you just don't see it.
@bradheath 3/ Or this exchange: (And again, I love that you will engage and if I'm wrong I admit it, such as when you called me on Abbott changing election laws).
Read 10 tweets
28 Oct
Yesterday afternoon I was in tears for hours, after reading IG report re case. I encourage every American who loves our country to read the entire IG report, media.defense.gov/2021/Oct/21/20… Read @MZHemingway real-time reporting when Ellis was placed on leave 1/
thefederalist.com/2021/01/22/bre…
2/ Read Fake News Washington Post story & Lawfare blog: washingtonpost.com/national-secur… lawfareblog.com/how-did-trump-…
3/ Then listen to @DevinNunes questioning of the General. rumble.com/vobjrp-nunes-g…
Read 5 tweets
27 Sep
THREAD: This thread is on an exchange I had with @bradheath this a.m. Brad & I have always had very respectful exchanges and while we both believe the other bias, we can still be gracious, so don't be an a$$ to him. Anyway, in response to my tweet below, Brad responded as: 1/
2/ This exchange is very significant because it illustrates a significant problem in the media. You either have @Acosta types who just write off perspectives as conspiracy, or you are more serious like Brad who think they know the answer, but don't. So I responded:
3/ Brad responded: But this is wrong. Even what he posted make that clear, so I corrected him.
Read 7 tweets
27 Sep
THREADETTE: Because I am not afraid of the truth and want to ensure I did not make a mistake in my analysis of the data, I read the Post's "fact check" below. Several points. First, the Post completely ignored the MIT engineers amazing report on the analysis of signatures. 1/
2/ Second, as is often the case, the Post frames it as "fraud", and ignores illegal voting. Third, the author is ignorant on election law that doesn't require you to identity that the illegal votes went to Trump v. Biden: question is whether # of illegal votes = margin
3/ in many states. Fourth, the commercial database Post poo-poos is actually more reliable than merely change of address database and contrary to Post's claim, those figures have stood up in GA. thefederalist.com/2021/07/09/new…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(