Yesterday afternoon I was in tears for hours, after reading IG report re case. I encourage every American who loves our country to read the entire IG report, media.defense.gov/2021/Oct/21/20… Read @MZHemingway real-time reporting when Ellis was placed on leave 1/
thefederalist.com/2021/01/22/bre…
2/ Read Fake News Washington Post story & Lawfare blog: washingtonpost.com/national-secur… lawfareblog.com/how-did-trump-…
3/ Then listen to @DevinNunes questioning of the General. rumble.com/vobjrp-nunes-g…
4/ What was done to Ellis was horrible, BUT what it says about our country is frightening. The Left uses both the press & the investigative mechanisms of the gov't & pushes false security concerns to accomplish it's political will. This is not a one-off.
5/5 This is the M.O. of the military establishment and the deep state and it is a devastating indictment on our great country. And sadly, I see now end b/c the elite press, instead of checking the gov't, collaborates with it. Pray for our country.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

29 Oct
@bradheath And Brad, this is why you're my favorite left-leaning reporter: because you at least try to be unbiased. Well, that and that you are never rude (and followers don't be rude to Brad!) and actually engage on the merits. I'll never convince you, but that's okay. 1/
@bradheath 2/ For instance, this exchange: I'm coming at it from the right and you from the left--you just don't see it.
@bradheath 3/ Or this exchange: (And again, I love that you will engage and if I'm wrong I admit it, such as when you called me on Abbott changing election laws).
Read 10 tweets
27 Sep
THREAD: This thread is on an exchange I had with @bradheath this a.m. Brad & I have always had very respectful exchanges and while we both believe the other bias, we can still be gracious, so don't be an a$$ to him. Anyway, in response to my tweet below, Brad responded as: 1/
2/ This exchange is very significant because it illustrates a significant problem in the media. You either have @Acosta types who just write off perspectives as conspiracy, or you are more serious like Brad who think they know the answer, but don't. So I responded:
3/ Brad responded: But this is wrong. Even what he posted make that clear, so I corrected him.
Read 7 tweets
27 Sep
THREADETTE: Because I am not afraid of the truth and want to ensure I did not make a mistake in my analysis of the data, I read the Post's "fact check" below. Several points. First, the Post completely ignored the MIT engineers amazing report on the analysis of signatures. 1/
2/ Second, as is often the case, the Post frames it as "fraud", and ignores illegal voting. Third, the author is ignorant on election law that doesn't require you to identity that the illegal votes went to Trump v. Biden: question is whether # of illegal votes = margin
3/ in many states. Fourth, the commercial database Post poo-poos is actually more reliable than merely change of address database and contrary to Post's claim, those figures have stood up in GA. thefederalist.com/2021/07/09/new…
Read 6 tweets
27 Sep
@ScottAdamsSays I wrote on two very narrow issues in detail here. But might I suggest you read all of the reports yourself because I couldn't even scratch the surface of the results. 1/thefederalist.com/2021/09/27/ari…
@ScottAdamsSays 2/ They are all available here: azsenaterepublicans.com/audit
@ScottAdamsSays 3/ I would begin here to understand the legal context and requirements. …5-4c86-b5d1-8b3d5d4d5b43.filesusr.com/ugd/2f3470_7fd…
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
I'm still amazed that in response to the Sussmann indictment the left's collective response was "That's It?" That was literally Washington Post's Editorial Board title until they changed it. Beyond the fact the indictment itself told of more charges likely b/c of accessing 1/
2/ by Internet I data obtained through senstive gov't contract & providing to 2 people outside that contract, the Left is forgetting all about William Barnett. Who'se he, you ask?
3/ He's the FBI Special Agent involved early on in Crossfire Hurrican through Special Counsel Mueller and had was having none of the BS. Read the affidavit if you never knew about it--if you did re-read it. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Read 8 tweets
22 Aug
Lawyers are a$$ and idiots part 2: So I do some pro bono work for non-profit & to do so recently gained reciprocity in state been licensed in IL since 1992. B/c just admitted to bar here, I have a "low" lawyer #. So, you'd think other members of the bar would be extra civil
2/ to a new lawyer. Nope. It's like carte blanche to be an extra big a$$. Opposing counsel in case refused to adjourn upcoming Summary Judgment even though discovery dispute; discovery not complete; and case is 2 months old & discovery dispute is NUTS! Refuses to answer
3/ clear RTA b/c it is dispositive against his client, forcing 2 months on my part. In last 2 years have agreed to extend every deadline asked ~12ish. That's the a$$ part. Here's the idiot part:
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(