@bradheath And Brad, this is why you're my favorite left-leaning reporter: because you at least try to be unbiased. Well, that and that you are never rude (and followers don't be rude to Brad!) and actually engage on the merits. I'll never convince you, but that's okay. 1/
@bradheath 2/ For instance, this exchange: I'm coming at it from the right and you from the left--you just don't see it.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1453007659951665166
@bradheath 3/ Or this exchange: (And again, I love that you will engage and if I'm wrong I admit it, such as when you called me on Abbott changing election laws).
https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1442598156521414656
@bradheath 4/ I'd wager your outlets haven't covered any of these stories or if they did, they didn't do it in a balanced way.
@bradheath 5/ And while this is not your outlet, I have first hand experience (and proof) of the reality of the biased media: thefederalist.com/2019/03/28/usa…
@bradheath 6/ Here's the Op-Ed I had written. It was not only accurate at the time, it was prophetic of everything that was to come out much later and that the IG report confirmed. thefederalist.com/2019/03/26/tim…
@bradheath 7/ Only thing that didn't pan out was "John Huber" but accurate that he was investigating at time. And you know what, I bet you if 100 reporters working at legacy outlets read that Op-Ed they'd think it was bogus...because they don't know facts b/c they read only each other.
@bradheath 8/ I read everyone and know the "counter," which is why when you made that comment re Abbott I knew what you meant and immediately agreed you were right. But you didn't know the GA situation.
@bradheath 9/ And I do hope you continue to engage b/c I truly believe you are decent and honest and thus will one day see it...even if not as clearly as those on the right, enough to be more objective.
@bradheath 10/10 And FYI if any of you are profane to Brad, I will mute you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
