A few weeks ago I was honored to testify to the San Francisco Grand Jury about why SF city government is neglecting its moral & legal responsibility to prevent hundreds of people from dying preventable drug deaths.
The members had read "San Fransicko" with great interest.
I am saddened and angry, but not surprised, given my research, that a member of the SF Board of Supervisors is now attacking me for writing a book documenting how she and others on the Board could immediately save hundreds of lives, and why they aren't.
I love San Francisco
I moved to the SF in 1993 to work on radical Left causes, moved to Berkeley in '98, & dated my wife, who lived in the Haight, & lived there part-time, from 2009-11
I wrote "San Fransicko" bc I'm heart-broken over what SF Govt is doing to the City.
In "San Fransicko" I propose that SF do what Amsterdam, Lisbon, and every other civilized city in the world has done, which is to shut down deadly open drug scenes, shelter the homeless, and treat addiction and untreated mental illness.
Before the book was published I was invited by Denver policymakers to offer testimony to what the city could do about its open drug scenes.
I have since been invited by three other cities to testify to lawmakers
No member of the SF Board of Super. has invited my testimony
Perhaps that's because their egos are bruised by the title of the book, but that's absurd. Their obligation is to the City and its residents, not their egos.
Moreover, I had reached out to every member of the Board in 2020.
And I published the results of my research in March.
Two members of the SF Board of Supervisors, @MattHaneySF & @Ahsha_Safai came to the May protest against fentanyl dealing in the Tenderloin that I organized with @JacquiBerlinn
I briefed both of them, at length, about how to shut down the drug scenes
SF Supervisor @myrnamelgar is attacking me for having run as a protest candidate for Governor in 2018, as though that is somehow a knock against me. I ran for the same reason I wrote San Fransicko: because I am sickened by what she & other politicians are allowing.
Anybody who reads "San Fransicko" will see that it is a deeply compassionate and liberal, yes liberal book. I advocate universal psychiatric care, universal addiction care, and the restoration of peace, safety, and order in the TL and other poor neighborhoods of color.
"San Fransicko is based on the best-available peer-reviewed scientific evidence & a description of my fieldwork in Amsterdam. It explains how to treat people in need & down the drug death markets. If you don't want to buy it, here's all the evidence:
Over the last 5 years I testified 6x to the US Congress, & gave testimony to policymakers in Japan, Britain, Korea, Netherlands, & Philippines. I am currently in Sweden meeting with lawmakers
I am more than willing to offer my testimony to the SF BoS, as I did to the Grand Jury
Either way, it will be my honor to, on Nov. 30, commit civil disobedience in SF w/ @JacquiBerlinn & other parents of children at risk of dying bc @myrnamelgar & the SF BoS refuse to fulfill their moral & ethical obligation to prevent thousands of more people dying on their watch.
In the end, this is on us. Politicians like @myrnamelgar are failing to act because we are failing to hold them accountable. They are letting the chaos spiral out of control. Every day that passes we are losing our humanity. It's time for us to stand up & demand change.
/end
P.S. We need people to join us for our 11 am protest on Tuesday November 30.
It will be safe & peaceful & we are coordinating with the SFPD. Most people won't commit civil disobedience.
If you would like to participate, please DM me. They are open!
We need you.
❤️🙏
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Already rich nations are blaming India for the failure of UN climate talks but there are 300+ million Indians who live on $1/day & it's unfair for the US, UK, Germany to demand India not burn coal before they become developed enough to afford natural gas & nuclear
It's especially hypocritical for the USA, UK, & Germany to demand India agree to quit coal at the *very same moment* that all three nations are *returning* to coal
The return to coal by the US, UK, and Germany is likely to be temporary, but all three nations became rich burning huge quantities of coal in the past, and so it's unethical that they demand that India, where 500M people will still use wood/dung in 2030, immediately phase it out
California is planning on shutting down this nuclear plant in 2024-25 and replacing it with solar farms and fossil fuels. In the name of the environment
San Francisco leaders say they want to stop drugs from killing 700+ people/year but in quieter moments they say they can’t
“We can’t end overdoses until we end poverty, until we end racism,” said the head of the SF’s drug OD prevention program washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
It’s ridiculous, of course. Amsterdam, Lisbon & all other civilized cities don’t let hundreds of people die on the streets. They shut down deadly open air drug markets, arrest dealers, and mandat rehab as an alternative to jail
The reason SF’s leaders won’t do this is because they believe the drug dealers are victims of oppression, and that the police and criminal justice system are evil
I know that sounds ridiculous, and it is ridiculous, but it’s also true
Over the last year, a growing number of progressives have pointed to police killings of unarmed black men, rising carbon emissions and extreme weather events, and the killing of trans people as proof that the US has failed to take action on racism, climate change, and transphobia
While Biden begs OPEC to produce more oil, France’s President uses the energy crisis to announce that “We will, for the first time in decades, start building nuclear plants.”
Which one of them looks like the stronger leader?
Recap:
- Japan, France, and Britain have all recently announced plans to restart and/or build new nuclear plants
- The US is shutting down nuclear plants
- Calif. Gov. @gavinnewsom is moving ahead with plans to shut down our last nuclear plant despite on-going blackouts
By 2020, the US had reduced its emissions 22% below 2005 levels. The reason nobody talks about this is because it was mostly thanks to replacing coal with fracked nat gas, which emits half the CO2 as coal, and which had nothing to do with UN climate agreements or climate policies
The same thing happened in Europe. EU had by 2020 reduced its emissions 26% below 1990 levels, mostly due to replacing coal with natural gas, and closing dirtier coal plants in Eastern Europe, neither of which had anything to do with UN climate agreements