You might think that the oceans are just parts of the land that are covered with water. Actually, that's really not the point - the oceans are there because the rocks *below* the oceans are fundamentally different from those below continents - and it's all because of magma! 2/9
Below the crust, the mantle is convecting. This is driven by heat given off by radioactive delay deep inside the Earth.
The mantle is solid rock - but every now and then a pocket melts: due to the addition of water, release of pressure, or extra added heat. Magma! 3/9
Those little pockets of melt are where all the action happens. As the magma cools, certain minerals will crystallize over time - and depending on their density, will either float to the top, or sink to the bottom. 4/9
Over the billions of years of Earth's evolution, this process has filtered lighter elements upwards. These accumulate at the surface, and stay there - because they are too light to sink back down & convect.
The continents? Just ancient pond scum - up to 4 BILLION years old. 5/9
Oceanic crust is just a baby in a comparison - some literally forming today - like in the center of the Atlantic - getting progressively older as it moves away from the spreading ridges.
As it ages, it cools, gets denser, and eventually starts to sink back into the mantle. 6/9
Continental crust is low density and old. Oceanic crust is dense and young. And just like how icebergs have deep roots, continents do too - the extra mass above is balanced out by the lower mass of the root. This is the principle of ISOSTASY: equilibrium of crustal mass. 7/9
So that explains the double-peaked curve. But it still leaves one question: if the oceans aren't important to the curve, why the peak at sea level specifically?
Okay, so I lied. Of course the ocean are important. 8/9
The oceans don't cause the double peak, but they DO cause grading to sea level. Rocks at high elevations erode, are carried to the sea by rivers, and are deposited there. If the sea level rose or fell, the higher peak would follow. 9/9
The "lumpiness" comes from variations in density and topography. Mountains have gravity, so the #geoid is generally higher in mountainous regions. But inside the Earth there are variations, too - from the different kinds of rocks and the thickness of the crust. 2/7
Elevations on Earth are defined relative to the geoid. So every time you look at a topographic map, there's a secret geoid hidden behind that data! 3/7
An #ophiolite is a rock with a secret: it tells the story of an ocean that lived and died.
Ophiolites are pieces of crust and mantle that formed at #spreadingcenters below an ocean. Why do we find these rocks (black dots) in mountain belts (red)? 🧵
The #WilsonCycle describes how tectonic plates break apart, forming an ocean basin that grows around a spreading center. But the oceanic lithosphere is dense, and it eventually breaks and sink into the mantle. #Subduction closes the basin and the plates on either side collide.
Rocks that form at a #spreadingcenter have a distinctive sequence: sediments on top, then basalts that erupted underwater, then denser rocks crystallized from melted mantle, grading into mantle. You might find this sequence on land (an #ophiolite), but it formed under the ocean.
A catastrophic #earthquake in 2010 on this fault system in #Haiti killed ~250k people. It just ruptured again, this time to the west. Hopefully the lower population density in this region, further from Port-au-Prince, will mitigate the impact. 😧
The updated focal mechanism for the earthquake from GFZ indicates the rupture was on land, and oblique thrust - similar to the overall 2010 event, which combines a mostly strike-slip mainshock with a cluster of smaller thrust earthquakes.
The depth of the #earthquake is still poorly constrained. GFZ puts it shallow, above the plate interface, dip 11°. USGS puts it deeper, within the slab, dip 26° and non-double-couple. Historical events of this scale in the region are old so not much help - 1929, 1933, 1964. 2/4
Given the curvature of the #subductionzone, it would certainly be reasonable to have some intra-slab deformation, and fracturing could be complex, leading to non-double-couple. The closest large event (1964) was apparently quite deep (125 km). 3/4
At this point I just assume no one knows anything. (Including myself...) This is especially important when you're working between fields - the same word can mean different things to different people.
...Fault slip rate = (1) average slip rate recorded by geology, (2) modeled average slip rate from GPS, (3) how fast the fault slips in an earthquake. But somehow, NOT (4) the rate the fault is slipping right now (probably zero)...
...Aseismic = (1) has not generated recorded seismicity, or (2) cannot generate earthquakes. These are very different things!...