The Earth's most common elevation is sea level - and yet, most of Earth's surface lies below sea level - FAR below sea level, at 4-6 km depth.

Why?

The answer is a combination of #platetectonics and Earth's oceans. 1/9

#tectoplot ImageImage
You might think that the oceans are just parts of the land that are covered with water. Actually, that's really not the point - the oceans are there because the rocks *below* the oceans are fundamentally different from those below continents - and it's all because of magma! 2/9
Below the crust, the mantle is convecting. This is driven by heat given off by radioactive delay deep inside the Earth.

The mantle is solid rock - but every now and then a pocket melts: due to the addition of water, release of pressure, or extra added heat. Magma! 3/9 Source: https://concord.org...
Those little pockets of melt are where all the action happens. As the magma cools, certain minerals will crystallize over time - and depending on their density, will either float to the top, or sink to the bottom. 4/9 Source: https://geo.librete...
Over the billions of years of Earth's evolution, this process has filtered lighter elements upwards. These accumulate at the surface, and stay there - because they are too light to sink back down & convect.

The continents? Just ancient pond scum - up to 4 BILLION years old. 5/9
Oceanic crust is just a baby in a comparison - some literally forming today - like in the center of the Atlantic - getting progressively older as it moves away from the spreading ridges.

As it ages, it cools, gets denser, and eventually starts to sink back into the mantle. 6/9 Image
Continental crust is low density and old. Oceanic crust is dense and young. And just like how icebergs have deep roots, continents do too - the extra mass above is balanced out by the lower mass of the root. This is the principle of ISOSTASY: equilibrium of crustal mass. 7/9 Source: https://en.wikipedi...
So that explains the double-peaked curve. But it still leaves one question: if the oceans aren't important to the curve, why the peak at sea level specifically?

Okay, so I lied. Of course the ocean are important. 8/9 Image
The oceans don't cause the double peak, but they DO cause grading to sea level. Rocks at high elevations erode, are carried to the sea by rivers, and are deposited there. If the sea level rose or fell, the higher peak would follow. 9/9

doi.org.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/10.1086/671392 Source: https://www.nps.gov...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Judith Hubbard

Dr. Judith Hubbard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JudithGeology

15 Nov
This is a map of sea level, exaggerated 10,000 times.

Why is it so weird and lumpy? Sea level is not defined by distance from Earth's center - it's an equal-gravity surface.

Understanding the #geoid is key to understanding #climatechange impacts. 1/7

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoid Source: http://doi.org/10.5...
The "lumpiness" comes from variations in density and topography. Mountains have gravity, so the #geoid is generally higher in mountainous regions. But inside the Earth there are variations, too - from the different kinds of rocks and the thickness of the crust. 2/7
Elevations on Earth are defined relative to the geoid. So every time you look at a topographic map, there's a secret geoid hidden behind that data! 3/7
Read 7 tweets
11 Oct
An #ophiolite is a rock with a secret: it tells the story of an ocean that lived and died.

Ophiolites are pieces of crust and mantle that formed at #spreadingcenters below an ocean. Why do we find these rocks (black dots) in mountain belts (red)? 🧵

doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.…
The #WilsonCycle describes how tectonic plates break apart, forming an ocean basin that grows around a spreading center. But the oceanic lithosphere is dense, and it eventually breaks and sink into the mantle. #Subduction closes the basin and the plates on either side collide.
Rocks that form at a #spreadingcenter have a distinctive sequence: sediments on top, then basalts that erupted underwater, then denser rocks crystallized from melted mantle, grading into mantle. You might find this sequence on land (an #ophiolite), but it formed under the ocean.
Read 5 tweets
14 Aug
A catastrophic #earthquake in 2010 on this fault system in #Haiti killed ~250k people. It just ruptured again, this time to the west. Hopefully the lower population density in this region, further from Port-au-Prince, will mitigate the impact. 😧

#tectoplot #haitiearthquake
The updated focal mechanism for the earthquake from GFZ indicates the rupture was on land, and oblique thrust - similar to the overall 2010 event, which combines a mostly strike-slip mainshock with a cluster of smaller thrust earthquakes.

#tectoplot #haitiearthquake
Scattered aftershocks from the 2010 earthquake were still occurring up through this year, although none were close in magnitude to the mainshock.

#haitiearthquake
Read 6 tweets
13 Aug
The #SouthSandwichIslands are a wonderful example of #platetectonics in miniature. The #SouthAmericanPlate is subducting west at ~7 cm/yr below the #SandwichPlate; this #subductionzone hosted a Mw7.5 #earthquake yesterday (Aug 12). 1/4

#tectoplot Image
The depth of the #earthquake is still poorly constrained. GFZ puts it shallow, above the plate interface, dip 11°. USGS puts it deeper, within the slab, dip 26° and non-double-couple. Historical events of this scale in the region are old so not much help - 1929, 1933, 1964. 2/4 ImageImage
Given the curvature of the #subductionzone, it would certainly be reasonable to have some intra-slab deformation, and fracturing could be complex, leading to non-double-couple. The closest large event (1964) was apparently quite deep (125 km). 3/4
Read 4 tweets
12 Aug
At this point I just assume no one knows anything. (Including myself...) This is especially important when you're working between fields - the same word can mean different things to different people.

Example from #earthquakescience below...
...Fault slip rate = (1) average slip rate recorded by geology, (2) modeled average slip rate from GPS, (3) how fast the fault slips in an earthquake. But somehow, NOT (4) the rate the fault is slipping right now (probably zero)...
...Aseismic = (1) has not generated recorded seismicity, or (2) cannot generate earthquakes. These are very different things!...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(