Look at Biden. Look at Harris. Then remember the Democratic presidential primaries.
To those who came in late, a little history.
In 1972 a nice, very liberal man named George McGovern won the Democratic nomination. He lost the election in a landslide. >
He didn't just lose in a landslide. He lost in a landslide to a man Democrats considered the very embodiment of evil - the un-rich but similarly un-clubbable Donald Trump of the middle 20th century: >
The Democrats determined never to let this happen again. So they turned back the clock and "reformed" the primary system so that it became a mere performance to cover up the reality that Democratic nominees would again be chosen in "smoke-filled rooms." >
Their choices often tracked the preferences of primary voters, but either way they were still consistently awful.
The Bernie Sanders scare of 2016, however, was seen as an existential threat to the party - or at least to its leadership.
They turned the screw tighter. >
By 2020 the Democratic primaries were a complete Kabuki performance. And now that the corporate press was completely coopted, the smoke-filled rooms were back in business.
Also... they had a plan for the general election. So it wouldn't even matter who they ran.
Kyle Rittenhouse was unquestionably defamed, and by every indication (then and now) should never have been charged. With God's help he'll be acquitted, or the charges against him dismissed, soon.
But don't get your hopes up on his recovering affirmative relief from anyone.
The media are virtually bullet proof here. As much as they refused to look at any information or point of view that departed from a narrative they desperately wanted to be true, they can buck what they did to reliance on the prosecution.
As far as the prosecution itself, forget it. There is #noaccountability under the law for virtually anything a prosecutor does to anyone, unfortunately. There are exceptional cases, and Kyle's should be one of them, but likely won't be. (It's called immunity)
Don't click the article; you probably won't understand the patois. Here is what it means in regular English:
Under the guidance of Rabbi Meir Stern, the Dean of Passaic Yeshiva, around 34 years ago Rabbi Hirth started an orthodox school for children in a tiny converted house >
and ended up building huge buildings to accommodate the tremendous growth of the community over the past 34 years.
He built [and led] elementary divisions for boys and girls, a girls' high school, Passaic / Clifton's ritual bath (mikvah), and was involved in nearly every major >
Let me explain something about the canard that #Judaism permits #abortion based on the concept of "rodef" or "pursuer."
Forget the fact that third status only applies when an abortion is required to literally save the life of the mother, in medical terms.
That's secondary.>
Again: It is indeed not only permitted, but required, to kill a pursuer to save the life of the pursued.
And we say that a fetus is like a pursuer if, but remaining pregnant, the mother is likely to die.
And why don't we say this about toenails, teeth or tumors? >
Because we don't have to. Who would think otherwise?
We have to teach this about a fetus, however, not because the Torah classifies a fetus like a tumor (which obviously we can remove) but because it classifies a fetus like a person. >