1/ (THREAD) Ok, short thread rounding up what we know so far on the #Cosmos1408 breakup, potentially as a result of a Russian ASAT test
2/ A breakup event for Cosmos 1408, a derelict Russian ELINT satellite, was initially reported by @US_SpaceCom in @HoustonChron
3/ Breakup was confirmed by @LeoLabs_Space, and at this point is only a few to couple dozen objects
4/ Cosmos 1408 was a Tselina-D, which doesn't have a known history of spontaneous fragmentation (from fuel or batteries): ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/2018…
5/ It was also a LARGE spacecraft (~ 2,000 kg) so if it was a hypervelocity collision (large debris or ASAT KKV), we'd expect hundreds to thousands of resulting debris space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/tseli…
6/ The ISS will keep passing through the Cosmos 1408 debris field every ~90 min or so for the next day, which is why they've been directed to prep for potential collisions:
7/ It seems Russia posted a NOTAM for a missile launch from 0200-0500Z on 15-17 Nov, which roughly corresponded to a flight test of a Nudol DA-ASAT out of Plesetsk
8/ Russia has tested the Nudol ten or so times since 2014, although to date not attempted an actual intercept that we know of
9/ @planet4589 has lined up the NOTAM with the orbit of Cosmos 1408 to show that it was possible to do the intercept
10/ So, to sum up, we know there was a debris event and its PLAUSIBLE it was caused by an ASAT test but do not yet have confirmation. If we get reports of a much larger debris cloud, then that will be a big sign...
11/ ADDENDUM - The US has confirmed it was an ASAT test that created thousands of pieces of debris

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with brianweeden

brianweeden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @brianweeden

14 Oct
1/ Another great (and troubling) episode with @aaronstein1 @wslafoy and @ArmsControlWonk, but I do want to talk a bit about the mention of the legal status of FOBS (sorry <foooooooobbbsss>) under the Outer Space Treaty
2/ On the pod, they mentioned that FOBS was in part designed as a way to get around the Outer Space Treaty, specifically the first part of Article IV on placement/stationing of nuclear weapons in orbit Image
3/ Sources as esteemed as the the United States government have indeed argued that FOBS does not violate this prohibition, as outlined in the DOD Law of War Manual dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Docu… Image
Read 14 tweets
12 Mar
1/ Ok so I guess it's time for a thread on the whole "Biden doesn't care about space" thing
2/ Lots of griping and commentary from the #space community about the lack of focus/interest on space from the Biden Admin so far. Let's unpack where that comes from and why
3/ Part of it comes from wonks like me who are concerned that there are not any space policy appointments at and wish to see more movement on space issues
Read 13 tweets
26 Jun 20
1/ Lots of buzz about the UK bidding to resurrect OneWeb as a GNSS system, short thread trying to unpack what I think is going on & the challenges in doing so (caveat is not a lot of public info on this right now)
2/ According to @FT (ft.com/content/a1da90…) the UK govt plans to put up £500M to help bring OneWeb out of bankruptcy and turn their system into some sort of GPS augmentation
3/ Apparently this is seen by the UK govt as a better alternative than the £5B (and more!) of building a completely independent UK GNSS, which was always an absurd idea anyways
Read 14 tweets
7 Apr 20
1/ Thread with my thoughts on yesterday's EO on space resources: whitehouse.gov/presidential-a… ;TLDR, I generally agree with the policy but think the EO was unnecessary and could generate blowback
2/ First, the EO doesn't change anything about US policy on space resources and it's a policy I generally agree with. Since 1960s, US has consistently said you can use space resources (water, regolith, minerals, etc) w/out violating Art. II of the OST.
3/ Put plainly, you can fish in the ocean without claiming ownership of the entirety of said ocean. It gets a bit more complicated when you consider using up an entire asteroid, but I think that's an edge case we don't have to worry about for a long while
Read 21 tweets
5 Feb 20
1/ Yesterday the Air Force delivered the first report to Congress on how it plans to stand up the #SpaceForce (velosteam.com/wp-content/upl…). Thread with a few things I found interesting in it:
2/ First, a reminder of just how early in the process we are for figuring out what the Space Force will actually be like and do. It will be years before some of the fundamental issues like acquisitions and recruiting are fully dealt with
3/ This list of guiding principles looks good on paper, but will be hard to stick to in reality and there's quite a bit of wriggle room
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(