1/ Ok so I guess it's time for a thread on the whole "Biden doesn't care about space" thing
2/ Lots of griping and commentary from the #space community about the lack of focus/interest on space from the Biden Admin so far. Let's unpack where that comes from and why
3/ Part of it comes from wonks like me who are concerned that there are not any space policy appointments at and wish to see more movement on space issues
4/ Part of it comes from Republicans, who are like to use space policy as part of the "proof" that their party is superior and Trump, who sees Space Force as one of his biggest accomplishments military.com/daily-news/202…
5/ Part of it comes from us in the community feeling a bit miffed that we're no longer getting as much attention from big name politicians and splashy WH events as we once were
6/ And I think there's also a legitimate concern that some of the progress made in the last several years might halt or even backslide. But let's put all of this in perspective
6/ First on the timing, Obama nominated a NASA Admin ~124 days after election (confirmed at 178 days). Trump took ~217 days (and 455 for confirmation). Biden is ~50 days in. So just chillax for a bit on that.
7/ Second, remember that we didn't have a National Space Council for Ford, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Bush W, or Obama and they managed to make many consequential space policy decisions: aerospace.org/sites/default/…
8/ Yes, I think it would be better to have a NSpC for improve interagency coordination and public visibility, as we argue in the @SWFoundation Issue Brief for the Biden Admin: swfound.org/media/207084/s…
9/ But that high political visibility comes at a cost of increased chance of partisan pushback, as we're seeing across a range of Trump Admin space policy decisions (even if they were sound on the merits)
10/ And while the Trump Admin did issue MORE policy decisions than any other admin, the scholar in me will point out that we have no empirical evidence that they were BETTER decisions or will be more consequential than other decisions
11/ The 1996 Clinton GPS policy was likely the single most consequential #spacepolicy decision ever, and it barely made a ripple in the news when it came out. Most space people today probably have no idea what was in it: aerospace.org/sites/default/…
12/ So to wrap up, I know we in the space world like having our egos stroked and think our stuff is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE WORLD but let's just step back and take a breath. Keep doing your good work and give the new team a chance /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Lots of buzz about the UK bidding to resurrect OneWeb as a GNSS system, short thread trying to unpack what I think is going on & the challenges in doing so (caveat is not a lot of public info on this right now)
2/ According to @FT (ft.com/content/a1da90…) the UK govt plans to put up £500M to help bring OneWeb out of bankruptcy and turn their system into some sort of GPS augmentation
3/ Apparently this is seen by the UK govt as a better alternative than the £5B (and more!) of building a completely independent UK GNSS, which was always an absurd idea anyways
1/ Thread with my thoughts on yesterday's EO on space resources: whitehouse.gov/presidential-a… ;TLDR, I generally agree with the policy but think the EO was unnecessary and could generate blowback
2/ First, the EO doesn't change anything about US policy on space resources and it's a policy I generally agree with. Since 1960s, US has consistently said you can use space resources (water, regolith, minerals, etc) w/out violating Art. II of the OST.
3/ Put plainly, you can fish in the ocean without claiming ownership of the entirety of said ocean. It gets a bit more complicated when you consider using up an entire asteroid, but I think that's an edge case we don't have to worry about for a long while
1/ Yesterday the Air Force delivered the first report to Congress on how it plans to stand up the #SpaceForce (velosteam.com/wp-content/upl…). Thread with a few things I found interesting in it:
2/ First, a reminder of just how early in the process we are for figuring out what the Space Force will actually be like and do. It will be years before some of the fundamental issues like acquisitions and recruiting are fully dealt with
3/ This list of guiding principles looks good on paper, but will be hard to stick to in reality and there's quite a bit of wriggle room