GP 3 5 6 7 and 9 are admitted
Ch Their feelings are important but not determinant
GP Not trying to suggest that witnesses will consciously lie in their statements
Ch This is opportunity to x exam
GP Doesn't avoid you looking at credibility. Everyone has polarised feelings ...
Ch Their feelings are important but not determinant
GP Not trying to suggest that witnesses will consciously lie in their statements
Ch This is opportunity to x exam
GP Doesn't avoid you looking at credibility. Everyone has polarised feelings ...
about this which hightens emotions. Wants to avoid a show trial. Look at what actually happened and you need to determine the reality and I'm happy to take this risk
RP Confirmation that no GMC witnesses are req to give evidence.
Discussion of dates re blocking accounts
RP Confirmation that no GMC witnesses are req to give evidence.
Discussion of dates re blocking accounts
GP E blocked AH on 1 April but we don't believe AH blocked anybody. He doesn't recall blocking anyone and has no access to the account. Doesn't deny it
Ch B blocked him after July.
RP We don't have a date for B being blocked but can ask B to recall this
Ch B blocked him after July.
RP We don't have a date for B being blocked but can ask B to recall this
Re Amendment Application: Concern about AH giving evidence at 3.30pm today so should we start tomorrow am? would hope to get through the evidence this week as so much has been admitted
AH's witness statement to remain private under Sch 41
Discussion re breaks and giving evidence
AH's witness statement to remain private under Sch 41
Discussion re breaks and giving evidence
GP AH has a health issue that might need some time away that he is self aware of. Some material is focussed on Stage 2. Unless something new arises or follows from it we're not proposing to call him again.
Tribunal have asked for a short break to discuss in private
[I think about whether AH should begin evidence today bearing in mind expected lengths of evidence and timings. It's not entirely clear what's happening tbh but I think AH is likely to be the only person...
[I think about whether AH should begin evidence today bearing in mind expected lengths of evidence and timings. It's not entirely clear what's happening tbh but I think AH is likely to be the only person...
...giving evidence and they want everything to be completed this week]
[This is the same impression as that taken by the other person observing the tribunal]
Chair We will amend 14gi to at least 38 tweets
We're concerned to start x examining AH at 3.30pm today when he's got 3 days to be examined esp as he won't be able to talk to his legal team whilst giving evidence and this seems unfair to AH
We're concerned to start x examining AH at 3.30pm today when he's got 3 days to be examined esp as he won't be able to talk to his legal team whilst giving evidence and this seems unfair to AH
RP Referring to my opening "actions continued" She sought to scale back her SM usage at this point and doesn't want the tribunal to misunderstand. It's about the volume
GP Post the injunction there weren't many tweets at all
Discussion on numbering of documents - deferred to tmrw
GP Post the injunction there weren't many tweets at all
Discussion on numbering of documents - deferred to tmrw
Chair So confirming that the GMC has now submitted its case?
RP Yes, excluding getting back to you re dates of blocking of witness B
Adjourned to 9.30am tomorrow
RP Yes, excluding getting back to you re dates of blocking of witness B
Adjourned to 9.30am tomorrow
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
