I had to run into Richmond night before last to get something for my wife, and I set the trip odometer. From here to the square is just over 3½ miles. So that would be a 7 mile round trip for the donks. I'm *really* wanting to do it, but I'm also kinda chicken.
It's a mile to pavement, then 2.5 to the square. This clip (which I often use) is the first quarter mile after I hit blacktop, heading towards town. The "country block" videos are going the other way from gravel. This was the only day so far I've gone this way.
I've been guesstimating the country block at four miles, but I measured that, too, that night, and it's closer to 3½. So about as far as the square, and I'd have to go as far back home. The country block takes an hour. Here's an hour of vid of it.
All the blacktop of the country block is 55 mph speed limit. Heading towards town, it's about a mile of 55, then 45, 35, 25 to the square.
We've driven a goodly portion of the homeward bound side of that, as a return from a long gravel back road out. Not on video.
Yesterday and today would have been great days to do the trip - weekdays, so less traffic, and utterly delicious weather. November with climate change, 60s, today I think it broke 70, but I was wiring trailer lights. Part of the reason this trailer was so cheap was, no lights.
I think I'm going to take my girls to Higginsville, on the other side of the river, at the end of the month and drive them in a Christmas parade. My mentor will be there with her Percheron. Or maybe 2 Percherons, I'm not sure. But I had to make the trailer legal. Brakes, too.
I'm kinda thinking about getting a Santa suit. So, this cart, these girls, this shaggy old man, in a Santa suit. Real (long white) hair, real (white) beard.
Sposta cool off a bunch tomorrow, be cloudy too, so tomorrow is out.
I need to plan on at least three hours for the round trip, I think. Depending on how well they trot the route, it could go a little shorter. If we walked all the way, probably four hours.
The world is a lot bigger at the speed of life.
PS the trailer is long enough for the donkeys and any of my carts.
I have mixed feelings about the obvious energy waste involved here, but ... To introduce the American public to donkeys as real, useful helpers... I've decided to do it. Expend the fuel. 🤷
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I did some work with my donkeys today. I could have done it all with a small tractor, although some of it would have been quite a bit harder.
Donkeys can walk sideways. Tractors can't. It makes a huge difference. I was working in cramped areas.
Old farms used to have small lots.
I had an emotionally trying day. I am making enemies of people I would prefer as friends.
Let's step back from carbon for a moment. Carbon emissions stipulated as a process which must be halted.
I tweeted this earlier today, and it's not carbon. But it's got to stop.
I came on this thread this morning, and I am sympathetic with it in one way, but in another way it shows the core problem with addressing climate change. Our core problem, the good guys, not the other guys. Our problem.
2. Nowhere in this lament for our fossil fuel addiction is any mention of the infrastructure plan.
We literally need more drilling in order to build that fucking highway. Instead of bitching about the oil, how about we bitch about the highway?
No, we all *want* the highway.
3. So we want to oil. So meanin'no offense, but if you're good with the highways, STFU.
We're drilling *for you.*
Passed the hundred page mark. I'm not hurrying. I might read a paragraph four times. The old brain does not assimilate information in the same way the same brain did when young, nor at the same speed.
Getting a fair number of assumptions and beliefs reset. Pleased about it.
One underlying belief has been, rather than reset, reinforced. That is, over our time here on Earth we have tried an incomprehensible different ways of organizing ourselves into societies.
Look at us today, I would say a majority of us don't believe humans could live without cars
3. At least, not have a decent life, a life worth living. We have reached the Pinnacle of Humanity.
Everyone before us was miserable. Three million years of miserable hominids glumphing around the savanna.
It's just a damn shame our way, The Best And Only Way, kills the biosphere
I tweeted this earlier, in the middle of another thread, but I want to address this question: do people think we can go on living like this and escape utter climate catastrophe?
I think the answer is, sort of, except they know there's an expiration date. Out there somewhere.
2. My opinion is just that, an opinion. It is based on responses to my climate / speed / energy threads going back three years, since I formed these theses.
I think most reasonable people think it's basically hopeless. I know all about the Not Giving Up school of thought. Good.
3. The Not Giving Up school of thought is, I feel, purest denialism. I can understand the roots of such an action, whether the decision be conscious or from another level, and maybe it's better. But it's not wired to reality. We are in full committed accelerationism, and physics.
A notable point the Davids make is that when there were still functioning American native societies in the fields and forests, people who found themselves in the other society, if they were Europeans relocated into native societies they usually stayed when they had a choice.
But Native people who got forcibly relocated into Euro society always went back when they got the chance.
I talk about slowing down, and people talk about sacrifice and wouldn't give up...
If there were no cars out on those roads I'd drive my donkeys to town every time.
More fun.
We've got this all wrong. White society, euro government, even if the people running the kleptocracy are actually black, it's this Euro money industrial system.
It's a terrible design. It can't be made to work. It blows up over and over.
This time it's gonna be *spectacular*.
There is no possibility that the current lifeways of developed societies can be maintained without continued degradation of the ecosystem to the ultimate point where it becomes unable to support us in anything approaching our current numbers.
And yes, that's how we stay alive.
2. This is a problem, because what we call climate change is but one symptom of broad ecosystem degradation and collapse.
Yes, carbon is a factor in climate change, but it is not the sole factor. And fuel carbon is even less the sole factor.
That doesn't imply we can keep burning
3. Sadly, virtually all "climate aware" people have been convinced that yes, since carbon is a problem, it must therefore be the only problem.
I find this odd. We all know about extinction. Deforestation. Desertification.
Don't we?