(a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause; . . .
(d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate >
> the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, . . . >
> (g) When a prosecutor knows of new, credible and material evidence creating a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant was convicted, the prosecutor shall: >
> (1) promptly disclose that evidence to an appropriate court or authority, and
(2) if the conviction was obtained in the prosecutor’s jurisdiction,
(i) promptly disclose that evidence to the defendant unless a court authorizes delay, and >
> (ii) undertake further investigation, or make reasonable efforts to cause an investigation, to determine whether the defendant was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit. >
(h) When a prosecutor knows of clear and convincing evidence establishing that a defendant in the prosecutor’s jurisdiction was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit, the prosecutor shall seek to remedy the conviction. <>
Look at Biden. Look at Harris. Then remember the Democratic presidential primaries.
To those who came in late, a little history.
In 1972 a nice, very liberal man named George McGovern won the Democratic nomination. He lost the election in a landslide. >
He didn't just lose in a landslide. He lost in a landslide to a man Democrats considered the very embodiment of evil - the un-rich but similarly un-clubbable Donald Trump of the middle 20th century: >
The Democrats determined never to let this happen again. So they turned back the clock and "reformed" the primary system so that it became a mere performance to cover up the reality that Democratic nominees would again be chosen in "smoke-filled rooms." >
Kyle Rittenhouse was unquestionably defamed, and by every indication (then and now) should never have been charged. With God's help he'll be acquitted, or the charges against him dismissed, soon.
But don't get your hopes up on his recovering affirmative relief from anyone.
The media are virtually bullet proof here. As much as they refused to look at any information or point of view that departed from a narrative they desperately wanted to be true, they can buck what they did to reliance on the prosecution.
As far as the prosecution itself, forget it. There is #noaccountability under the law for virtually anything a prosecutor does to anyone, unfortunately. There are exceptional cases, and Kyle's should be one of them, but likely won't be. (It's called immunity)