It is my Twitter account. Of course the debates I want to start are selective and driven by my agenda.
Why would I start debates on someone else's agenda? Twitter is free. They have their own accounts.
These sanghis randomly show up demanding some mythical objectivity from me as is I'm some newspaper's editorial board.
I am me. I have my agenda. I tweet it.
On my last Pune visit, a childhood acquaintance said, "don't mind haan, I love your food & travel & cricket tweets a lot, but when you talk Indian politics, it seems like you're mostly obsessed with calling out the RSS and brahminism."
I said, "Yup. Why aren't you?"
He said "agenda vaatato tujha"
And I said, "arre jhaamya, maajhya Twitter var mi maajha agenda lihinaar ka tujhya saasryacha?"
Him "Ho, pan tu faar fatkaL lihitos sanghabaddal aaNi braahmNaanbaddal"
And I'm like "Tar?"
He was speechless cos he hadn't thought beyond it.
There is this default reverence in the Indian system for the sangh and brahmins that if you question, even in abstract philosophical terms, people decide to feel personally attacked.
That's their problem, not mine.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In case you're a non-Indian (or even an Indian) confused about what #Farmlawsrepealed exactly means and why everyone from Rihanna to Martina to Mia Khalifa were tweeting about it, here's a very simple thread laying out the simple facts.
60% Indians make a living through farming.
The modern Indian state plays a big role in agriculture, as a result. It tries to be the guarantor for all produce, set minimum support prices, provide a basic safety net. It's a progressive system put in place by INC people mostly. It has several problems too.
There are sectors of agriculture where government involvement causes more harm than good. And there are sectors of agriculture where government involvement causes more good than harm.
It's a complex world, right?
So anyway, Modi is always looking for some big "WIN".
BTW brace for a lot of Dhume crowd to thinkpieces about how they are also not modi fans and they support protests and Brutus is an honorable man but those farm bills were actually a lovely libertarian thing that has sadly fallen victim to Greta and Rihanna's wokeness.
That public talks about farming policy with such inexplicable confidence as if they have a phawda on one shoulder and a yoked bull in the other hand as they head to the farm. Bro, you're like some random techie or MBA. Sit down. Let the adults talk.
This was one of those low points of @WSJ's editorial standards. Dhume churned out a column monetizing involuntary mansplaining. All Rihanna asked was why aren't we talking about internet shutdowns during farmers protests. But the compulsive corporatist went all Ayn Rand on her 😂
Best is all the "hmpf, so all you need to do to repeal laws you don't like is go out on the streets and protest non-violently" as if it's a bad thing. When it's democracy 101. But sanghis don't understand democracy or the idea of a republic where protests are a fundamental right.
"maybe we should also go protest on the streets for repealing laws we don't like" said another butthurt sanghi.
Umm, y'all have like a two thirds majority in the Parliament. And y'all are in the streets everyday already. You use violence. #FarmersProtest didn't.
Most sanghi Twitter influencers have built their following by posting something that is 1. Hateful about some minority
AND 2. Has some obvious factual error (like posting a pic of Indira eating corn but calling it seafood)
Even QTs correcting their error make them money.
Even when you're QTing someone to call them out as wrong or bigoted, you're still giving them a wider audience. In that, they reach more people on the sidelines whom they can try to convince.
Really, please, stop QTing fascists. Screenshot them if you must call them out.
Oh this guy! Saying this! A supreme court lawyer BTW. This guy thinks he needs to offer a rebuttal to what I said. And we wonder why India's institutions unraveled so quickly. Because of "lawyers" like him.
Nikhil Mehra is a sanghi who is too craven to admit he's a sanghi.
I've had the misfortune of knowing Nikhil Mehra through online connections for over a decade. He does tend to side with the stupidest and angriest sides and seems allergic to empathy or humanity.
The complete surrender if the Indian judiciary to sanghis makes so much sense.
It's so cute though that he put out a whole podcast or YouTube or whatever to rebut my thread. 😂😂😂
The problem with CBag is really simple. He's not grown out of his middle school high school IIT IIM glory days. That's when his emotional and intellectual growth peaked. So he says "make the naughtiest person the class monitor" and if I were 12 years old, I'd be like, YES!!!
The thing about life is, it is way more complex and way worse consequences than the way a 12 year old views school dynamics. So making the naughtiest boy class monitor is nothing like making an avowed bigot with a criminal record the CM of India's most populous state.
Similarly, "I have probs with mom but won't diss her to the neighbors" is a nice sentiment. But has absolutely no logical rational grown up connection to making the leap that you shouldn't criticize your country on an international stage.