There are three broad types of yields in the market:
• Demand for leverage (margin)
• Native token distributions (token yields from protocols)
• Yield from network activity (cash-flow distributions)
We'll break these down, so if you don't understand, don't panic yet.
1. Demand for Leverage
This yield comes from people/institutions looking to borrow USD to trade crypto. It looks like this:
• You deposit your money into Blockfi/NEXO/etc.
• Institutions and retail investors borrow it
• They make leverage trades
• You get paid interest
Why do these players use leverage?
• They're degens looking to lever up on risk/reward
• They're 'smart money' looking to lever up on arbitrage/market-neutral strategies
These institutional trades are low-risk/low-reward which means leverage helps them extract value.
Have you heard about $BTC contango?
Institutions can make a trade where they buy $BTC today, sell a futures contract, and make profit by holding $BTC until expiration.
You hypothetically want UNLIMITED leverage on this 'risk-free' trade.
Demand for this leverage is high because of the many opportunities in crypto.
As long as markets are inefficient and want leverage, high stablecoin yields will exist.
Demand for this leverage might dry up in a bear market with low volume/low speculation, but it won't go away.
2. Native token distributions
How is it possible that platforms like Sushiswap pay out such high yields?
Well, Sushiswap is a decentralized exchange, which needs liquidity so users can trade assets. Sushiswap attracts people to PROVIDE liquidity by paying out its native token.
Early in a protocol's life cycle, no one knows if it will be successful.
Thus, it is forced to provide high yields so that people will use the platform.
The yield gets paid out to users in a token. Based on the perception of that token, it becomes more or less valuable.
These young protocols will always have tokens that are poorly understood and might moon or might tank.
So they have to pay out huge yields to incentivize adoption.
It sometimes turns into a game of who-can-get-out-first.
But because valuations are based on little/poor info, it's impossible to know if they'll be valuable.
So high yields for young protocols are here to stay, but they can rug.
So this yield farming requires liquidity providers to sell tokens/move money around to manage risk.
3. Yield from Network Activity
Yield from network activity happens when young protocols become successful (Uniswap, Spell, Maker)
Yields are still paid out in native tokens, but the tokens are backed by real quantifiable value.
The team has executed, and now token holders are entitled to the value created by:
Yields can be high early on for liquidity providers, but shrink as an accurate and consistent valuation for the token exists.
These assets are lower risk/lower reward.
And because value comes from real-world cash flows, real yields will drop when cash flows drop.
This last type of yield will:
• drop in bear markets
• drop because yield farming the protocol is not as risky
However, it still remains higher than the 0.5% yield provided by a bank account.
So, to wrap up:
• Yields in crypto come from different places
• In the current environment, yields will stay higher than yields in TradFi markets
• Yields will drop in a bear market, especially as trading volumes drop, across categories
Did you learn something from the thread? Do me a favor!
1. Give that first tweet a like/RT 2. Follow me! @JackNiewold 3. Subscribe to my newsletter. I write about altcoins and how to make money with them.
Abracadabra Money's $SPELL token has TANKED over the last couple of weeks.
But maybe things are a lot more bullish than they seem...
Here's how the brand new analytics available on the Abracadabra Money Dashboard tell us we're overdue for a pump:
I think the most direct way to value $SPELL is its cash flows: it's unique in that just about every cent from borrowing activity gets paid out to stakers.
The past 6 weeks have produced an average of $2.33 mm/week. That's about $120 million in yearly revenue.
And that revenue doesn't cost anything. No marketing, no COGS, no interest expense.
Thus, we can value it more or less as pure earnings.
Below are some comps with P/Es that show how $SPELL is very undervalued. Note Maker DAO for an analogous crypto.
If you're a $SPELL holder and follow byebyedai.money, you might have noticed that fees have dropped heavily over the last 7 days.
But that could be good for $SPELL in the long term: here's how @danielesesta used smart tokenomics to create a downward-resistant protocol👇
$SPELL, for now, generates fees for stakers of sSpell via three mechanisms:
• Position opening
• Position closing (liquidation)
• Interest on debt position
Unlike other forms of debt, you can pay your interest on your $MIM ( $SPELL's stablecoin ) position all at once:
1. Lock up your collateral for $MIM 2. Your collateral accrues interest 3. You repay all of the debt plus the interest 4. Interest is distributed to sSpell stakers
A collection of the most interesting threads on crypto Twitter this week.
Learn:
• Why L1 blockchain space is the alpha real estate in crypto
• How tradfi valuations miss the true value of crypto
• How to manage wealth like a rich person
Your Sunday crypto digest 👇
Everything in crypto comes back to one thing: blockchains.
Here’s why buying L1s is like buying NYC real estate in the 1800s.
Facebook's Diem stablecoin will change the cryptocurrency landscape forever.
Diem has hinted at partnerships with existing cryptos. Any solid announcement of a partnership would cause that crypto to go parabolic.
So which crypto is it? Read on👇
(warning: tinfoil hat time)
I first came across the rumor on Twitter.
It originated from an update video from $COTI founder @shahafbg.
Quote: "as our integration to a major enterprise continues, I really look forward to letting you know who that enterprise is, when it's done, I will let you know."
People took him to be hinting at COTI launching a stablecoin with FB, so I decided to take a look.