GET A GRIP Profile picture
Nov 19, 2021 27 tweets 12 min read Read on X
#THREAD

This recent @BBC article makes it crystal clear to any sane & reasonable person why Nadine Dorries - with her long history of divisive, misleading & inflammatory 'culture war' rhetoric - is completely unsuitable to be Britain's Culture Minister.

bbc.co.uk/news/entertain…
Her central claim is that an imaginary homogeneous group of "left-wing activists" are *solely* responsible for unacceptable rhetoric which has resulted in "cancel culture" & an environment where 'people are scared to say what they feel' - something Dorries has never experienced.
She clumsily, inarticulately & misleadingly claims that she doesn't plan "to charge out on a culture war battle" but immediately contradicts herself by bringing up the hard-right's favourite cliched culture war trope: "cancel culture".

Let's explore this initial claim.
She claims people are afraid to say what they think for fear of being "cancelled", mainly due to 'mean Lefty activists' - when many good & decent people are terrified of supporting Palestine for fear of being labelled antisemitic by people like Dorries, & of being "cancelled".
Organisations like the National Trust have been demonised as "anti-British" by Tory MPs & right-wing newspapers & other media, & many progressives are now fearful of being labelled 'anti-British' or 'anti-free speech' just for challenging racism, sexism or other forms of bigotry.
Furthermore, the relentless demonisation by Government Ministers & other right-wingers of scholars involved in the legitimate academic field of critical race theory, & ordinary people supporting the global #blacklivesmatter movement, can make people fearful of challenging racism.
Nadine Dorries has claimed that ‘Left-wing snowflakes (another culture war term) are killing comedy', yet when a left-wing comedian like Nish Kumar gets unexpectedly "cancelled" by the @BBC's right-wing Time Davie, Dorries has nothing to say.

chortle.co.uk/news/2021/09/1…
I know the claim that cancel culture is an exclusively left-wing phenomenon is a grotesquely misleading lie: on three separate occasions, right-wingers have written to my employer to try to taint my professional reputation & get me sacked, purely because of my views.
Like so many right-wing culture war warriors, Nadine Dorries claims to be all for free speech, but like some hypocritical authoritarian dictator, she's more than happy to attack comedians for making jokes & to disingenuously accuse them of misogyny - if the jokes are about her.
Dorries accuses what she calls "online campaigners" (people who share opinions on a public platform) of 'frightening' young people "who actually do want to engage" in serious debate: it's as if the numerous grotesquely bigoted & abusive hard-right Twitter accounts don't exist.
Dorries disregards all the evidence showing that over the last few years, no doubt encouraged by the right-wing press & the Govt's dangerously divisive & inflammatory rhetoric, by far the fastest growing terrorism threat in Britain is from the far-right.

Her gaslighting is breathtaking - just last year Nadine Dorries, Maria Caulfield & Lucy Allan, were reprimanded for sharing & amplifying a doctored video of Keir Starmer from a known far-right Twitter account.

She also RTd a Tommy Robinson tweet before his account was suspended.
She complains in the interview that "People were making these comments (comedians making jokes) for political attack & nothing else" & she found them "thoroughly unpleasant." This reveals her hypocrisy: Dorries is a seasoned veteran at hurling vile insults at political opponents.
It recently came to light that she'd called James O'Brien a "posh boy fuck wit", but allow me to recap some of her "best bits" which demonstrate to any reasonable person beyond any doubt whatsoever, that Nadine Dorries is arguably THE most inappropriate MP to be Culture Minister.
Dorries really has no shame whatsoever: without a shred of humility or self-awareness, while claiming she is a victim & saying how awful it is that comedians make humorous comments about her which she finds "thoroughly unpleasant", she can tweet out disgusting crap like this:
In 2013 she was accused of racism after saying Chuka Umunna looked like Chris Eubank as they both had an "arrogant smirk" in common: "Apparently, if you forget the name of someone who is black you are racist. I forget the name of loads of white people what does that make me?"
In March 2018 she commented on a video of Sadiq Khan, reading out death threats to him that called him a ‘Muslim terrorist’. Her comments are grotesque, & in any normal job - or Government - she'd have been sacked on the spot.

(Khan is not the mayor for Telford or Rotherham).
In 2017 she suggested there was an “implication” that the Muslim community “votes as instructed” in elections.

She's also ranted about the burka & Muslim treatment of women

It's *almost* like she has a massive problem with Muslims.
When Boris Johnson described Muslim women who wear the burka as ‘bank robbers’ & ‘letterboxes’, Dorries commented that Johnson should have gone so far as to call for a ban on the burka & that women who chose to wear the burka do so out of force, to cover up their ‘bruises’.
Like fellow hard-right culture war cranks, Dorries has been a vociferous critic of the @BBC for a long time (despite sharing a doctored video herself), while giving gushing praise to the GB News channel. She recently asked “Will the BBC still be here in 10 years? I don’t know”.
In the same recent ideological attack on Britain's PUBLIC SERVICE broadcaster, Dorries claiming the @BBC is staffed by people “whose mum & dad worked there” when in 2013 she herself employed two of her daughters in her parliamentary office at a cost to the taxpayer of £80,000.
In 2012, Nadine Dorries made yet another unhinged, inflammatory & misleading claim when she said that the Left's support for abortion rights wasn't about choice, but stems from its historic relationship with the "eugenics movement".
In 2012 a regressive, controversial "unevidenced ideologically motivated" bill proposed by Dorries, calling for teenage girls (but not boys) to be given COMPULSORY lessons in sexual abstinence, was pulled at the last minute from the House of Commons.

theguardian.com/education/2012…
And in 2018, she compared Theresa May to Adolf Hitler: "Nadine Dorries seemed to suggest the Prime Minister might follow the Nazi Fuhrer's example of killing himself in a locked underground room."

I could go on & on...

mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
Claiming that left-wing activists have "hijacked" social media is like claiming the far-right have "hijacked" the press, the Government, & British democracy.

To conclude: no reasonable, rational person would ever approve of Nadine Dorries occupying the role of Culture Minister.
And now THIS deleted tweet has resurfaced, in which she makes unhinged accusations & attempts to get @mrjamesob sacked.

Utterly grotesque & the absolute height of hypocrisy.

Nadine Dorries is EXACTLY the thing she claims to despises.

I rest my case. 🙏

Their latest solution to those in fear of being "cancelled" by 'authoritarian woke snowflakes' & mean 'Lefty activists':

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GET A GRIP

GET A GRIP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

Nov 21
🧵

In May, Reform UK became the UK’s first party to accept crypto donations; experts warned of major money-laundering and foreign interference risks.

The NCA says Tether—backed by Reform’s £13.7M donor Christopher Harborne—has been used by Russia to fund its war in Ukraine. Image
A multibillion-dollar scheme that exchanges cash from drug and gun sales in the UK for crypto—digital tokens hiding users’ identities—has enabling “sanctions evasions and the highest levels of organised crime, including providing money-laundering services to the Russian state”.
theguardian.com/politics/2025/…Image
In 2023, the hedge fund co-founded by GB "News" owner Paul Marshall, who employs 60% of anti-Net Zero Reform UK's MPs, had £1.8 BILLION invested in fossil fuel firms.

Harborne (who has Thai citizenship under the name 'Chakrit Sakunkrit) also makes money from fossil fuels.

Read 17 tweets
Nov 19
🧵

I and countless others are sick to death of the billionaire-funded Reform UK propaganda machine, GB “News”, and their decontextualised ‘facts’ that would make Goebbels blush.

Let’s examine the claim that “one quarter of foreign sex offenders come from just five countries”.
Yes, the raw data comes from a genuine Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison census, but the way it’s being weaponised is deeply misleading.

The statistic sounds explosive, and deliberately so: a factoid engineered to sound like a revelation of hidden danger.
The right-wing information pipeline: a cherry-picked fragment of official data stripped of context, laundered through an opaquely funded “think tank” that isn't a think tank, amplified by billionaire-funded media, and weaponised by opportunistic politicians for electoral gain.
Read 38 tweets
Nov 19
🧵

Reform UK’s head of Policy is a privately educated son of immigrants called Muhammad Ziauddin Yusuf.

Yusuf is a shameless liar.

Below, I'll expose just a few of his more recent brazen lies and misleading claims about asylum seekers, immigrants, and ‘foreign nationals’.
In the September 2025 @SkyNews Immigration Debate, chaired by Trevor “Muslims are not like us” Phillips, Reform UK’s head of policy Zia Yusuf made a series of inaccurate and highly misleading claims about migration, and more recently, on @BBCNewsnight, about social housing. Image
These assertions are easily disproved with publicly available data, but often go largely unchallenged on air, despite being about some of the most sensitive and polarised issues in politics.

Yusuf started by claiming that UK net migration “last year” was “about a million.” Image
Read 39 tweets
Nov 17
🧵

When a newspaper repeatedly publishes misleading, distorted, or outright inaccurate stories, the public expects independent regulators to step in.

What if I told you the editor responsible for these stories is now in charge of writing the very rules that govern press ethics? Image
Privately educated Chris Evans, editor of The Daily Telegraph since 2014, has—since January 2024—simultaneously served as Chair of the IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice Committee, the body that drafts, reviews, and rewrites the ethical rulebook that the UK press is meant to follow. Image
Evans holds this regulatory role at a time when his own paper is producing more factual corrections and clarifications than almost any other major UK outlet — with an overwhelming concentration in politically weaponised right-wing themes.

telegraph.co.uk/news/0/telegra…
Read 25 tweets
Nov 11
🧵 OPEN LETTER

Defend the @BBC Before It’s Gone

The BBC isn’t perfect — but it’s ours. As coordinated attacks on its independence intensify, I warn that if we don’t defend it now, we may lose more than a broadcaster — we may lose a cornerstone of British democracy... Image
As a long-time critic of the @BBC, let me spell it out: what we’re seeing right now isn’t organic outrage — it’s a sophisticated coordinated campaign by ideological enemies and commercial competitors to undermine the BBC’s independence and funding. Image
If you can’t see that, you’re being played — and that’s exactly the point.

Let’s start with Michael Prescott, author of the dodgy dossier leaked exclusively to The Telegraph, who is a PR man and former political editor at Murdoch’s Sunday Times.

news.sky.com/story/who-is-m…
Read 40 tweets
Nov 10
🧵

Growing numbers of people are angry and disillusioned with the political establishment.

Desperate voters are easy prey for manipulative populists—as they were in Germany in the 1930s.

But the problem isn't immigrants or religious minorities. It's always wealth distribution. Image
The story of wealth in Britain over the past eight decades since WWII is not one of ‘the invisible hand’, but of deliberate policy choices—choices that once built one of the most equal society in modern history, but now sustain one of the most unequal in the developed world. Image
Data tracking wealth distribution from 1945 to 2025 reveal a striking U-shaped curve: a rapid reduction in wealth inequality after World War II, making Britain one of the most equal countries on earth by the mid 1970s, followed by an unbroken rise.

Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(