It’s not an ideological approach. It’s bringing in the people with honed skills to perform for government.
The real power is at the decision table. Not in protests from the outside. So bring the protesters into government to make the changes.
Brilliant strategy.
There are many good people who have great ideas that just require the opportunity to implement them. While bureaucrats can be a support, they cannot lead. Cabinet ministers lead the agenda. You need effective leaders to get the job done, not politicians.
That seems to be the LPC approach to party recruitment of candidates. Searching for those with expert level skills who are willing to shape policy and create a new direction on the job.
It’s unfortunate JWR didn’t work out. She should have been vetted much better.
Too much history with Bill Wilson and Pierre Trudeau. Too much animosity by communities that have been betrayed and mistreated. There are exceptions, but the most radical FN seem to be in areas of the country that don’t have numbered treaties.
Recruitment should focus on numbered treaty regions of the country for party candidates. Maybe even at the bureaucratic level of Deputy Minister.
Power is always on the inside, not in protest.
FN extremists seem to have banded together with American Native rights movement and adopted their radicalized approach. Which I am researching for evidence that radicalization is foreign influenced. Foreign to both US and Canada.
There is certainly evidence that the progressive left has been compromised by dark money and nefarious foreign support. I have found a few indicators that reveal the progressive left is aware of the influence, but I believe most are just gullible useful idiots.
I would assume the same is true in the FN community. Most people believe in their leaders. But where are the leaders getting information on how to protest effectively?
Certainly not from their elders.
The militancy and rigidity in ideals is uncharacteristic of indigenous protest in Canada.
The Idle No More protests spawned much activism so I’m going to research that era.
How did Harper turn from hated pariah to libertarian freedom champion in the eyes of FN communities?
That’s a project I’m working on.
I remember a cousin being very upset in 2006 that Harper wanted to remove the Indian Act and assimilate FN.
Now that same cousin is adamant the Indian Act needs to be repealed and FN given liberty.
How did that happen?
I’ll be looking for the answer. I have a few leads. All of them lead back to Atlas Network. The question is how.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many NDP supporters are criticizing Jagmeet Singh because he’s commenting on the American Rittenhouse verdict, but not on the BC floods or Wet'suwet'en arrests of protesters and journalists.
The situation is not funny. But laughing is all I have left.
So deluded about their leader, NDP supporters are suffering a bit of cognitive dissonance because Singh is avoiding major issues in our own nation and fostering emotional angst of injustice over state side events.
They’re struggling to understand why the leader they trust is appealing to American racial injustice and a corrupt judicial system Trump & GOP created by installing corrupt and partisan judges.
Something that only tangentially impacts Canadians.
That’s how fascism creeps in. That’s how police states are formed. Slowly, incrementally. Then you wake up one morning and all the socialists are being rounded up. All the activists prosecuted and persecuted.
We bicker about who should intervene.
But provincial pipelines are provincial jurisdiction. What’s happening in BC is entirely provincial. Note worthy because it’s happening during an extreme crisis.
Whether the protesters have a case or not, protesting is not an illegal activity.
In the 1970’s, a Russian man defected to Canada. He revealed how KGB destroyed enemies.
Not with war. By planting the seeds of self destruction and fostering those ideas into the political milieux to create social collapse, anarchy & animus.
How was that accomplished? Using libertarian ideology. Promoting extreme egotistical hedonism, a society would collapse in chaos, anarchy and violence. Incapable of democratic cooperation & compromise. At that point, annexation occurred. The nation cannot defend itself.
So divided in conflict and chaos, institutional failures and political, economic and social instability, an organized defence can’t be made. And the territory and its assets become easy pickings.
But it is a long game strategy. At minimum 25-30 years commitment.
When plans written in 1997 are realized 20 years in the future, there was a strategic plan that got them there. The corrupt don’t rely on kismet or chance. They plan meticulously.
There are so many bread crumbs that lead back to the CNP, Koch Brothers and Dominionists.
It sounds like a bad Bond 007 movie, but it’s real.
It involves the super wealthy, organized crime, organized religion, most of the world’s most powerful dictators, corrupt politicians and compromised political parties.
I’ve never heard of anything so ridiculous, racist and short sighted as their plan.
But that’s what ignorance produces.
Many FN oppose pipelines. But many do not. The majority of reserve residents who are employed are involved in some kind of extractive industry.
Oil, Natural Gas, Lumber, Mining (diamonds or minerals).
That’s the entire rural economy. Extraction of raw resource materials. Many independent farmers supplement their income with seasonal extraction industry jobs.
The article says the film maker disputes the description of the graves as “mass graves,” not the fact graves were found.
The fact graves were found at a residential school at all is damning enough. But she wants to bicker about the description of dead children en masse.
It is incorrect to state these graves are mass graves.
Mass graves are when several people are murdered at once and buried together. Mass numbers of graves of children at a school is worse than a mass grave.
It means the genocide was sustained over several generations.