There is nothing wrong with having open and honest conversations about the data. That doesn’t mean I’m an anti-vaxxer. I’ve had both doses, and I recently had my flu shot as well. Please don’t be afraid to discuss strengths and weaknesses of the booster data.
https://twitter.com/sesiegler/status/1462039633248886790
Name calling is for people who can’t come up with good counter arguments but feel the need to opine. Name calling is not science. Debating the data is science.
I’ve been through this already with the lab leak theory, which I found to be a plausible origin in January of 2020. A lot of people tried to shame me on social media, but you don’t conduct an investigation by immediately declaring one plausible option as conspiracy.
If you decide an option is conspiracy before conducting any sort of unbiased, fact finding investigation, I would say that you are the conspiracy theorist.
You can call me names all you want on here. I understand it comes with the territory, and I’ve grown thick skin after everything I have been through thus far in my career.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
