A⚡️🧵on why we should #electrifyeverything to solve climate change while driving progress vs. degrowth /1
We make most of our electricity from fossil fuels in a manner future generations will find barbaric. Burn fuel to make heat to boil water to make steam to drive turbines to generate electricity. Lose about 2/3 of the energy to heat along the way yet spew all the carbon as CO2. /2
Ok so if electricity generation is so wasteful and dirty, we'd best minimize the amount of electricity we use in our energy mix right? /3
Turns out even if we're inefficient in producing electricity, increasing the share of electricity in our energy mix has correlated with a far MORE efficient society. Check out this rad data from 1899-1985 🤓 (source & caveats at end of thread) /4
Simple way to think about the data: even if we throw away two joules of energy for every joule of electricity we make, that remaining joule of electricity is way more productive than all three joules would have been if used as heat. Not always true but holds across sectors. /5
And it's not surprising: electricity allowed us to be way more productive because unlike the heat & steam that powered the industrial revolution, electricity lets us produce with information + control + organization + automation. No longer at the mercy of shafts and pulleys! /6
Alert: we don't need to make electricity like fossil-burning barbarians anymore...because science! We invented ways to make electricity from sunshine & l̶o̶l̶l̶i̶p̶o̶p̶s̶ cool breeze instead. And now clean, renewable electrons are the cheapest electrons on earth. #winning /7
So... (1) We can make super cheap, carbon-free electricity, (2) Every joule of renewable electricity we bring online effectively displaces 3 joules of fossils + associated CO2 emissions, and (3) Electricity makes us healthier & more productive. Q.E.D. 👉 #electrifyeverything /8
BUT #electrifyeverything will remain a techno-optimist dream without a major step change in political will. We're smart about how we use electrons once out of the outlet, but our power grid was built a century ago to move electrons like heat/steam - it's old, dumb & dangerous. /9
Lots of tech solutions for a smarter grid: power flow control, HVDC, storage, vehicle-to-grid, etc. But regulation + lack of central planning has us pushing on a rope. We desperately need to learn how to convert $ into infrastructure in this country. /10
Lots riding on this: a renewable power grid at global scale can give us the sustainable e-lives we deserve: induction, heat pumps, EVs plus carbon free/neg plastic, cement, metals, fuels. Shout out to @activatefellows inventing those pieces! activate.org/fellows /11
Postscript 1: Data above is from Electricity in the American Economy. To preempt comment: yes 1) elec share & productivity leveled off a lot since the 70s, 2) correlation ≠ causation, 3) diminishing returns from electrifying industrials. Still..the future remains electric ⚡️ /13
Postscript 2: the #electrifyeverything thesis clicked for me when I stumbled on the data above back in 2008. Stayed up nights pulling together a big tech talk at Google, and it fell so flat I shelved it. Now --> a tweet in hopes one day I can say "this held up well!" 😁 /14
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thrilled to introduce ARIA's first set of Programme Directors. Their job: push the limits of the possible to unlock breakthroughs that benefit everyone. /1
The application form for ARIA PD started with one question: “If you could direct up to £50m to drive a bold and focused scientific/technical step-change in human progress, what would you do?” /2
From thermodynamic computers to programmable plants, our PDs are questioning the status quo of what's possible. Learn more about their motivations and the opportunity spaces they're exploring here: /3
We're recruiting a founding group of programme directors (PDs) at @ARIA_research. Short 🧵 on why this is such an exciting/important experiment, and why you should pause to consider the opportunity - especially if at first glance you felt like it wasn't meant for you. /1
We're backing people, then projects. ARIA PDs will look a lot like ARPA program managers. With a £50M+ budget, you’ll join ARIA for 3-5 years with creative control to develop a focused scientific/tech vision, fund a portfolio of projects, & direct progress. /2
But we're doing some things very differently. As far as I know, ARIA's PD search is the most open call if its kind. It consists of a short application form designed to tease out each candidate's potential, with minimal constraints on just about every dimension. /3
Catch-up thread with notes from a handful of awesome roundtables we recently hosted (part of our pre-launch learning/brainstorming for @ARIA_research). Featuring 🍄⚕️🦠🔌💻 and more... /🧵
Microbiome engineering
- Busy space but still tons of headroom
- Interdisciplinary "grand oppty" to model/predict the full lifecycle of microbiome dynamics?
- How about an HMP for soil?
- UK leads the world in linking omics to clinical --> what about for microbiome? /2
AI / fintech x the electricity grid
- Optimal control can drive massive (10+%) cost/efficiency gains
- But: huge non-tech barriers (markets, regulation etc.)
- With net zero goals & a single ESO, what would it take to make the UK a global sandbox for grid innovation? /3
I've built up an arsenal of geeky metaphors to help scientists make sense of startups and entrepreneurship.
Figured it might make for a fun 🧵to share a few here... /1
[Chemistry] Your startup is a chemical rxn. Value prop dictates thermo, business model dictates kinetics. Success requires [A] an exothermic reaction (products more valuable than reactants) & [B] overcoming activation barriers (fundraising, distribution, etc.). /2
[Newtonian Mechanics] Entrepreneurship is about punching above your weight and leveraging resources outside of your direct control. Always seek leverage points. /3
At peak, Bell Labs was about $2B/yr in today's USD. Split 30% fundamental research, 10% translation, 60% systems engineering. (straight from the source) /2
For perspective, we're talking about a corporate R&D lab with a fundamental research arm twice the size but same caliber as Cal Tech alongside a systems engineering team roughly the same size/caliber of Space X (guessing), with a translation team >10x the size of Otherlab. /3
Wake up call: The US spends more on research in human health than agriculture, space, and energy combined, yet we were unprepared for covid-19—not because we weren’t spending enough, but because we weren’t spending effectively.
Thesis: The world has changed dramatically since WW2, yet the US is largely working off the same science policy playbook. We built the most powerful infrastructure for academic research...but our capacity for turning scientific advances into practical solutions has withered.