This paragraph from Lepore’s take on Henkin in @NewYorker is also shockingly at variance with the historical record, as+
summarized by the most up-to-date review by leading historians of the matter unfortunately not open access (email me…): but that’s hardly an excuse for a great historian or an @TheAtlantic journalist:
שאלה מפורסמת היא למה יעקב ״החריש״ כשהא שמע מה עשה שכם לבתו. ולא רק שהתנהג כאילו לא שמע כלום עד שהגיעו בניו אלא שנתן לבניו לנהל את משא והמתן עם חמור ושכם ואז נתן לשמעון ללוי לעשות מה שהם עשו.
מה גרם לו להיות כל כך פאסיבי?
אולי יש רמז+
בפסוק א׳ של הפרק.
מה זאת אומרת שדינה יצאה ״לראות בבנות בארץ?״ מה היא ראתה בכלל? ולמה התורה מציגה את המפגש הזה בינה לבין בנות בארץ בצורה כל כך עמומה? יתכן שהמפגש הזה מאוד חשוב- זו מעין כותרת לסיפור!
הצעה:
אל תקרא ״לראות״ אלא ״לרעות״
הרי בפעמים הקודמות שנתקלנו בבנות, הן היו שואבות או/ורועות!
that the key term "mimetic" is used in opposing ways by two highly influential & great sociological analyses of importance to me:
DiMaggio & Powell (1983) & Soloveitchik (1994)
& that it's productive to think about *why*
<THREAD>
To be sure, the papers each use "mimetic" to describe when people (Soloveitchik) or organizations (D&P) model their behavior on others, even though (in each case) the person or organization has good reasons not to slavishly model their behavior on others.
Also, both see mimesis as something that is "taken-for-granted" to the point that it is essentially done nonstrategically & even unthinkingly.
to support their campaign of terrorizing and chasing Palestinians off their land)
And he predicts much of how the last two weeks would unfold:
“A wave of terror is what Bibi needs in order to give the appearance of an extreme emergency, which would necessitate firming a+
nationalist government with him at the helm encompassing all the right wing parties... He won’t light the match-that’s what the men of Lehava (Kahanists who Bibi helped get in the Knesset- EZS) will do. But he’ll give the matches to them. He wants a crisis. Jerusalem would be+
The Purim story is driven by an act of resistance: Mordecai’s refusal to bow to the authoritarian vizier Haman.
This simple defiance infuriates Haman, leading to the genocidal decree.
But it’s unclear why Mordecai refused to bow to Haman as this would seemingly have been standard protocol given Haman’s status. Two complementary explanations are:
OK, if you're Shabbat-observant (& perhaps even if you're not), here's a take on this week's Torah portion (the story of the first Shabbat) that's guaranteed to put a big smile on your face!
<THREAD n=25>
OK, here's a description of a biblical moment that's notoriously challenging to understand. When the people discovered the flaky, frost-like substance on the ground, they were bewildered.
They turned to one another and said:
"Mān hu"
What does this mean?
"Hu" is straightforward: "it is" or "is it"
The problem is "mān."
It doesn't mean anything. It eventually becomes the name for this mysterious food. But at this point in the story, it means nothing. It's not a word!